| Literature DB >> 29030924 |
Jenny Bjerre1, Kasper Kyhl2, Finn Gustafsson2, Henning Kelbaek3, Thomas Engstrøm2, Peter Skov Olsen4, Philip Hasbak5, Niels Vejlstrup2, Per Lav Madsen2,6.
Abstract
We present two patients with three-vessel disease and severely depressed left ventricular (LV) systolic function where viability analysis by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated areas of near-transmural sub-endocardial fibrosis and hence little chance of regaining systolic function as judged by conventional analysis from radial function. Despite the pessimistic cardiac magnetic resonance imaging analysis, however, the patients underwent full revascularization and regained impressive increases in LV systolic function mainly based on improved longitudinal systolic segment function. The cases highlight that sub-epicardial, longitudinally oriented myocytes can contribute to overall LV systolic function and suggest taking their 'piston-function' into consideration when analysing viability.Entities:
Keywords: CMR (Cardiovascular magnetic resonance); Ischaemic cardiomyopathy; Revascularization; Viability
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29030924 PMCID: PMC5695176 DOI: 10.1002/ehf2.12187
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ESC Heart Fail ISSN: 2055-5822
Figure 1(A) Late gadolinium enhancement short axis images at a basal (upper left), midventricular (upper right), and apical (lower left) level and four‐chamber image with widespread areas of near‐transmural fibrosis in LCX and right coronary artery territories but little fibrosis in the left anterior descending artery territory. (B) Pre‐percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) two‐chamber (upper panels) and four‐chamber (lower panels) images with end‐diastolic (left) and end‐systolic (right) measurements of AV‐plane displacement. (C) Post‐PCI two‐chamber (upper panels) and four‐chamber (lower panels) images with end‐diastolic (left) and end‐systolic (right) measurements of AV‐plane displacement, which improved to >9 mm in all segments.
Figure 3Segmental (American Heart Association 16‐segment model) late gadolinium enhancement (%) (Rows 1 and 4); mean diastolic wall thickness (mm) (Rows 2 and 5); and mean wall thickening (%) (Rows 3 and 6) before (left panels) and after revascularization (right panels).
Figure 2(A). Late gadolinium enhancement short axis images at a basal (upper left), midventricular (upper right), and apical (lower left) level and four‐chamber image with 50% transmural fibrosis in the anterolateral wall at a basal and midventricular level and up to 75% transmural fibrosis in the whole circumference at an apical level. (B) Pre‐CABG two‐chamber (upper panels) and four‐chamber (lower panels) images with end‐diastolic (left) and end‐systolic (right) measurements of AV‐plane displacement. (C) Post‐CABG two‐chamber (upper panels) and four‐chamber (lower panels) images with end‐diastolic (left) and end‐systolic (right) measurements of AV‐plane displacement, which improved from 1 mm in all areas to 6, 5, 5, and 7 mm in the two‐plane (anterior and inferior) and four‐plane (medial and lateral) views, respectively.