Literature DB >> 29030076

Predictive Factors of De Novo Overactive Bladder After Artificial Urinary Sphincter Implantation in Men With Postprostatectomy Incontinence.

Kwang Jin Ko1, Chung Un Lee1, Tae Heon Kim1, Yoon Seok Suh2, Kyu-Sung Lee3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rates and predictive factors associated with the development of de novo overactive bladder (OAB) and to assess the effects of de novo OAB on surgical outcomes after an artificial urinary sphincter (AUS).
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients with postprostatectomy incontinence who underwent AUS surgery. Urodynamic studies were performed during preoperative visits in all patients, and patients with OAB or neurogenic bladder were excluded. We assessed the development of de novo OAB based on patient symptoms. Treatment success was defined as no need for pads, and social continence was defined as the need for ≤1pad per day at the end of the follow-up. A multivariate analysis was performed using a logistic regression model to assess predictors of de novo OAB.
RESULTS: The rate of development of de novo OAB after surgery was 37.5%. The treatment success rate was significantly higher in the no-OAB group (72.4%) than in the de novo OAB group (55.4%) (P = .038). A low preoperative cystometric capacity of less than 300 mL (odds ratio 5.27, confidence interval 1.02-27.28; P = .048) and pelvic irradiation (odds ratio 3.18, confidence interval 1.01-10.03; P = .049) were predictive factors of de novo OAB after AUS surgery.
CONCLUSION: De novo OAB occurs commonly after AUS surgery, and the presence of de novo OAB adversely impacts treatment success. Low preoperative cystometric capacity of less than 300 mL and pelvic irradiation predict the occurrence of de novo OAB after AUS implantation.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29030076     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2017.09.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  5 in total

Review 1.  Artificial Urinary Sphincter Complications: Risk Factors, Workup, and Clinical Approach.

Authors:  Roger K Khouri; Nicolas M Ortiz; Benjamin M Dropkin; Gregory A Joice; Adam S Baumgarten; Allen F Morey; Steven J Hudak
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Efficacy and safety of intradetrusor botulinum toxin injections for idiopathic overactive bladder syndrome in patients with an artificial urinary sphincter.

Authors:  Geoffroy de Sallmard; Marie-Aimée Perrouin-Verbe; Benoit Peyronnet; Xavier Biardeau; Delphine Maucort-Boulch; Emmanuel Chartier-Kastler; Véronique Phé; Alexia Even; Charles Joussain; Inès Dominique; Gérard Amarenco; Xavier Gamé; Christian Saussine; Alain Ruffion
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 4.226

3.  Management of stress urinary incontinence in female patients with spinal cord injury by autologous fascial sling: time for a revival?

Authors:  Jürgen Pannek; Jens Wöllner
Journal:  Spinal Cord Ser Cases       Date:  2022-05-24

4.  De novo OAB After ATOMS: An Underestimated Problem or a Rare Side Effect?

Authors:  Sandra Schönburg; Wilhelm Bauer; Nasreldin Mohammed; Clemens Brössner; Paolo Fornara
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-12-17

5.  Impact of preoperative factors on recovery of continence after artificial urinary sphincter implantation in postprostatectomy incontinence.

Authors:  Dongho Shin; Joonho Ahn; Hyeok Jae Kwon; Kyung Jae Hur; Hyong Woo Moon; Yong Hyun Park; Hyuk Jin Cho; U-Syn Ha; Sung-Hoo Hong; Ji Youl Lee; Sae Woong Kim; Woong Jin Bae
Journal:  Prostate Int       Date:  2021-05-11
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.