Literature DB >> 29030069

Sex differences and menstrual cycle effects in cognitive and sensory resting state networks.

Susanne Weis1, Sophie Hodgetts2, Markus Hausmann2.   

Abstract

It has not yet been established if resting state (RS) connectivity reflects stable characteristics of the brain, or if it is modulated by the psychological and/or physiological state of the participant. Based on research demonstrating sex hormonal effects in task-related brain activity, the present study aimed to investigate corresponding differences in RS networks. RS functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (RS fMRI) was conducted in women during three different menstrual cycle phases, while men underwent three repeated RS fMRI testing sessions. Independent component analysis was used to identify the default mode network (DMN) and an auditory RS network. For the DMN, RS connectivity was stable across testing sessions in men, but varied across the menstrual cycle in women. For the auditory network (AN), retest reliable sex difference was found. Although RS activity in the DMN has been interpreted as trait characteristic of functional brain organization, these findings suggest that RS activity in networks involving frontal areas might be less stable than in sensory-based networks and can dynamically fluctuate. This also implies that some of the previously reported effects of sex hormones on task-related activity might to some extent be mediated by cycle-related fluctuations in RS activity, especially when frontal areas are involved.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Default mode network; Resting state; Sex differences; Sex hormones; fMRI

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29030069     DOI: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Cogn        ISSN: 0278-2626            Impact factor:   2.310


  23 in total

1.  Adolescent sex differences in cortico-subcortical functional connectivity during response inhibition.

Authors:  Yu Sun Chung; Vince Calhoun; Michael C Stevens
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2020-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Functional connectivity predicts gender: Evidence for gender differences in resting brain connectivity.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Chase C Dougherty; Stefi A Baum; Tonya White; Andrew M Michael
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Predicting personality from network-based resting-state functional connectivity.

Authors:  Alessandra D Nostro; Veronika I Müller; Deepthi P Varikuti; Rachel N Pläschke; Felix Hoffstaedter; Robert Langner; Kaustubh R Patil; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2018-03-23       Impact factor: 3.270

4.  Resting-State Brain Connectivity Predicts Weight Loss and Cognitive Control of Eating Behavior After Vertical Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Authors:  Hilâl Cerit; Paul Davidson; Taryn Hye; Priyanka Moondra; Florina Haimovici; Stephanie Sogg; Scott Shikora; Jill M Goldstein; A Eden Evins; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Luke E Stoeckel; Laura M Holsen
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 5.002

Review 5.  Ovarian steroid hormones: A long overlooked but critical contributor to brain aging and Alzheimer's disease.

Authors:  Steven Jett; Eva Schelbaum; Grace Jang; Camila Boneu Yepez; Jonathan P Dyke; Silky Pahlajani; Roberta Diaz Brinton; Lisa Mosconi
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-19       Impact factor: 5.702

6.  Applying dense-sampling methods to reveal dynamic endocrine modulation of the nervous system.

Authors:  Laura Pritschet; Caitlin M Taylor; Tyler Santander; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Machine Learning Evidence for Sex Differences Consistently Influences Resting-State Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Fluctuations Across Multiple Independently Acquired Data Sets.

Authors:  Obada Al Zoubi; Masaya Misaki; Aki Tsuchiyagaito; Vadim Zotev; Evan White; Martin Paulus; Jerzy Bodurka
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2021-10-06

8.  Big data approaches to identifying sex differences in long-term memory.

Authors:  Link Tejavibulya; Dustin Scheinost
Journal:  Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-12-24       Impact factor: 2.550

Review 9.  Sex/gender differences in cognition, neurophysiology, and neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2018-06-20

Review 10.  The scientific body of knowledge - Whose body does it serve? A spotlight on oral contraceptives and women's health factors in neuroimaging.

Authors:  Caitlin M Taylor; Laura Pritschet; Emily G Jacobs
Journal:  Front Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2020-09-28       Impact factor: 8.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.