Literature DB >> 29029957

A model-based approach for estimation of changes in lumbar segmental kinematics associated with alterations in trunk muscle forces.

Iman Shojaei1, Navid Arjmand2, Judith R Meakin3, Babak Bazrgari4.   

Abstract

The kinematics information from imaging, if combined with optimization-based biomechanical models, may provide a unique platform for personalized assessment of trunk muscle forces (TMFs). Such a method, however, is feasible only if differences in lumbar spine kinematics due to differences in TMFs can be captured by the current imaging techniques. A finite element model of the spine within an optimization procedure was used to estimate segmental kinematics of lumbar spine associated with five different sets of TMFs. Each set of TMFs was associated with a hypothetical trunk neuromuscular strategy that optimized one aspect of lower back biomechanics. For each set of TMFs, the segmental kinematics of lumbar spine was estimated for a single static trunk flexed posture involving, respectively, 40° and 10° of thoracic and pelvic rotations. Minimum changes in the angular and translational deformations of a motion segment with alterations in TMFs ranged from 0° to 0.7° and 0 mm to 0.04 mm, respectively. Maximum changes in the angular and translational deformations of a motion segment with alterations in TMFs ranged from 2.4° to 7.6° and 0.11 mm to 0.39 mm, respectively. The differences in kinematics of lumbar segments between each combination of two sets of TMFs in 97% of cases for angular deformation and 55% of cases for translational deformation were within the reported accuracy of current imaging techniques. Therefore, it might be possible to use image-based kinematics of lumbar segments along with computational modeling for personalized assessment of TMFs.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Finite element analysis; Image-based modeling; Lumbar segmental kinematics; Optimization procedures; Trunk muscle forces; Trunk neuromuscular strategies

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29029957      PMCID: PMC5844798          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.09.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  37 in total

1.  Combination of finite element modeling and optimization for the study of lumbar spine biomechanics considering the 3D thorax-pelvis orientation.

Authors:  Francisco Ezquerro; Antonio Simón; María Prado; Ana Pérez
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 2.242

2.  The stabilizing system of the spine. Part I. Function, dysfunction, adaptation, and enhancement.

Authors:  M M Panjabi
Journal:  J Spinal Disord       Date:  1992-12

3.  Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.

Authors:  N Arjmand; D Gagnon; A Plamondon; A Shirazi-Adl; C Larivière
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Methodological aspects of SEMG recordings for force estimation--a tutorial and review.

Authors:  Didier Staudenmann; Karin Roeleveld; Dick F Stegeman; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 2.368

5.  Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine.

Authors:  A H Eskandari; N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl; F Farahmand
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Subject-specific biomechanics of trunk: musculoskeletal scaling, internal loads and intradiscal pressure estimation.

Authors:  F Ghezelbash; A Shirazi-Adl; N Arjmand; Z El-Ouaaid; A Plamondon
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-05-12

7.  Sensitivity of kinematics-based model predictions to optimization criteria in static lifting tasks.

Authors:  N Arjmand; A Shirazi-Adl
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2005-11-08       Impact factor: 2.242

8.  Cumulative mechanical low-back load at work is a determinant of low-back pain.

Authors:  Pieter Coenen; Idsart Kingma; Cécile R L Boot; Paulien M Bongers; Jaap H van Dieën
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Muscle response pattern to sudden trunk loading in healthy individuals and in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  A Radebold; J Cholewicki; M M Panjabi; T C Patel
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2000-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Disturbance and recovery of trunk mechanical and neuromuscular behaviours following repetitive lifting: influences of flexion angle and lift rate on creep-induced effects.

Authors:  Nima Toosizadeh; Babak Bazrgari; Brad Hendershot; Khoirul Muslim; Maury A Nussbaum; Michael L Madigan
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  2 in total

1.  Trunk-Pelvis motions and spinal loads during upslope and downslope walking among persons with transfemoral amputation.

Authors:  Julian C Acasio; Iman Shojaei; Rajit Banerjee; Christopher L Dearth; Babak Bazrgari; Brad D Hendershot
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  A Dynamic Optimization Approach for Solving Spine Kinematics While Calibrating Subject-Specific Mechanical Properties.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Dongmei Wang; Antoine Falisse; Pieter Severijns; Thomas Overbergh; Lieven Moke; Lennart Scheys; Friedl De Groote; Ilse Jonkers
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.