Literature DB >> 28365064

Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine.

A H Eskandari1, N Arjmand2, A Shirazi-Adl3, F Farahmand1.   

Abstract

An essential input to the musculoskeletal (MS) trunk models that estimate muscle and spine forces is kinematics of the thorax, pelvis, and lumbar vertebrae. While thorax and pelvis kinematics are usually measured via skin motion capture devices (with inherent errors on the proper identification of the underlying bony landmarks and the relative skin-sensor-bone movements), those of the intervening lumbar vertebrae are commonly approximated at fixed proportions based on the thorax-pelvis kinematics. This study proposes an image-based kinematics measurement approach to drive subject-specific (musculature, geometry, mass, and center of masses) MS models. Kinematics of the thorax, pelvis, and individual lumbar vertebrae as well as disc inclinations, gravity loading, and musculature were all measured via different imaging techniques. The model estimated muscle and lumbar forces in various upright and flexed postures in which kinematics were obtained using upright fluoroscopy via 2D/3D image registration. Predictions of this novel image-kinematics-driven model (Img-KD) were compared with those of the traditional kinematics-driven (T-KD) model in which individual lumbar vertebral rotations were assumed based on thorax-pelvis orientations. Results indicated that while differences between Img-KD and T-KD models remained small for the force in the global muscles (attached to the thoracic cage) (<15%), L4-S1 compression (<15%), and shear (<20%) forces in average for all the simulated tasks, they were relatively larger for the force in the local muscles (attached to the lumbar vertebrae). Assuming that the skin-based measurements of thorax and pelvis kinematics are accurate enough, the T-KD model predictions of spinal forces remain reliable.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  Image registration; Kinematics; Muscle forces; Musculoskeletal model; Spinal loads

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28365064     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.03.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  3 in total

1.  Does curve pattern impact on the effects of physiotherapeutic scoliosis specific exercises on Cobb angles of participants with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A prospective clinical trial with two years follow-up.

Authors:  Yunli Fan; Michael K T To; Eric H K Yeung; Jianbin Wu; Rong He; Zhuoman Xu; Ruiwen Zhang; Guangshuo Li; Kenneth M C Cheung; Jason P Y Cheung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  A model-based approach for estimation of changes in lumbar segmental kinematics associated with alterations in trunk muscle forces.

Authors:  Iman Shojaei; Navid Arjmand; Judith R Meakin; Babak Bazrgari
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2017-10-06       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Anatomy-Aware Inference of the 3D Standing Spine Posture from 2D Radiographs.

Authors:  Amirhossein Bayat; Danielle F Pace; Anjany Sekuboyina; Christian Payer; Darko Stern; Martin Urschler; Jan S Kirschke; Bjoern H Menze
Journal:  Tomography       Date:  2022-02-11
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.