Literature DB >> 29029525

Association between air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Lei Zhao1,2, Heng-Rui Liang3, Feng-Ying Chen1, Zi Chen4,5, Wei-Jie Guan6, Jian-Hua Li1.   

Abstract

Air pollutant levels in many Chinese cities remained significantly higher than the upper limits stated in World Health Organization guidelines. In light of limited evidence in China, we conducted a meta-analysis summarizing the association between acute exposure of air pollution and cardiovascular mortality. We searched PubMed, and CNKI databases etc. for literature published in English or Chinese up to January 2017. Outcomes were pooled and compared using random-effects model. Excess risks (ERs) per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2 and O3 were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to lag patterns (lags 0, 1, 2, 0-1, 0-2 days), gender (male vs. female), temperature (cool vs. warm) and age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65). Study bias was detected using Begg's and Egger's test. Of 299 articles identified, 30 met inclusion criteria. Each 10 μg/m3 increase in the concentration was associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular mortality for PM2.5 (0.68%, 95% CI: 0.39-0.97%), PM10 (0.39%, 95% CI: 0.26-0.53%), NO2 (1.12%, 95% CI: 0.76-1.48%), SO2 (0.75%, 95% CI: 0.42-1.09%), and O3 (0.62%, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92%), respectively. Air pollution conferred greater adverse impacts on cardiovascular mortality for longer duration of exposures. Strongest associations were seen for lag 0-1 day of exposure among all pollutants. Female, lower temperature, and age > 65 years were associated with greater risks of cardiovascular mortality for all pollutants. Higher concentrations of air pollutants correlated with a greater short-term increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further high-quality studies in China are urgently warranted to determine the susceptible population, which would offer reference for policy-making to minimize adverse health effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  China; air pollution; cardiovascular; meta-analysis; mortality

Year:  2017        PMID: 29029525      PMCID: PMC5630425          DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20090

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncotarget        ISSN: 1949-2553


INTRODUCTION

Despite considerable improvement in prevention and management, cardiovascular diseases remain the leading cause of death worldwide. Decomposition of global and regional life expectancy showed the prominent role of reductions in age-standardized death rates for cardiovascular diseases worldwide [1]. According to World Health Organization (WHO), about 17.3 million people died of cardiovascular diseases annually, accounting for > 30% of all-cause mortality [2]. Cardiovascular mortality is the top cause for mortality worldwide, with 3.7 million people aged below 60 years [3]. Factors that trigger cardiovascular events, particularly in susceptible population, represent a major public health concern. Air pollution is a leading environmental health issue [4]. Higher levels of gaseous components [including nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3)] and particulate matter with diameter less than 10μm (PM10) and 2.5 μm (PM2.5) have been associated with poorer cardiovascular health [5, 6]. Short-term exposure to air pollutants led to increased cardiovascular events [7-10]. According to 2002 World Health Report, approximately 800,000 premature deaths were attributable to air pollution worldwide annually [11]. Moreover, short-term exposures to air pollution have been associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and hospital admissions [7, 12]. China is the major developing country. Air pollutant levels in many cities remain significantly higher than the upper limits stated in the WHO guidelines [13]. Daily concentrations of PM2.5 in mega-cities, such as Beijing and Shanghai, may peak to 100–300 μg/m3 [14, 15], which far exceeded the upper limit (10 μg/m3) endorsed by WHO Air Quality Guideline (AQG) [13]. However, most evidence of the association between short-term effect of air pollution and cardiovascular mortality were derived from North American or West European countries where pollutant levels were much lower [16-18]. Studies conducted in China are very scarce. Importantly, previous findings might not be directly extrapolated to China [19], because adverse effects of air pollution vary with regions and time [20]. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis summarizing the association between short-term exposure of air pollution and cardiovascular mortality in China.

RESULTS

Study selection and identified papers

299 records were identified after excluding duplicates. With in-depth review, 30 full-text articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. Details of selection process are presented in Figure 1. The median concentrations of each pollutant was 54 μg/m2, 85.3 μg/m2, 46 μg/m2, 57 μg/m2 and 57.88 μg/m2 for PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2 and O3, respectively.
Figure 1

Flow chart of literature search and criterion for inclusion and exclusion of studies

Across the span of 1998 to 2015, two studies adopted case-crossover design and the remaining were time-series studies. Cardiovascular mortality effects were assessed in association with acute exposure to five major air pollutants, including PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2 and O3. Of these, 17 articles focused on PM10, 10 studies were pertinent to PM2.5, 12 studies included NO2, 9 studies was related to SO2 and 6 studies referred to O3. Eleven cities were included in our study, which were mainly comprised of provincial capitals in China. Table 1 summarizes the details of studies included in our study. See Supplementary Table 1 and Supplementary Figures 1– 11.
Table 1

Contextual details of studies included in the meta-analysis

StudyYearCityStudy periodStudy designAir pollutantLags exposureModel
Xu et al.2017Beijing, China2013Time-seriesPM2.5, NO2, SO2, O3, CO0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 0–1, 0–3, 0–5GAM
Qin et al.2016Zhengzhou, China2013–2015Time-seriesO30–1GAM
Lin et al.2016China2013–2015Time-seriesPM2.5, SO2, NO2, O30–3GAM
Xie et al.2015Beijing, China2010–2012Time-seriesPM2.50, 1, 2, 3, 4, 0–2, 0–4GAM
Li et al.2015Beijing, China2005–2009Time-seriesPM2.51,2GAM
Zhang et al.2014Guangzhou, China2008–2011Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20–5GAM
Tong et al.2014Tianjin, China2008–2011Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20, 0–1GLM
Yu et al.2013Hong Kong, China1998–2007Time-seriesPM10, NO20–3GAM
Wang et al.2013Tianjin, China2006–2010Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20, 1, 2, 0–3GAM
Huang et al.2013Hong Kong, China1998–2007Time-seriesPM10, NO2, O3, SO20, 1, 0–3GAM
Geng et al.2013Shanghai, China.2007–2008Time-seriesPM2.53NG
Yu et al.2012Guangzhou, China2006–2009Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20–1GAM
Yang et al.2012Suzhou, China2006–2008Time-seriesO30–1GAM
Yang et al.2012Guangzhou, China2007–2008Case-crossoverPM2.50–1Logistic
Tao et al.2012China2006–2008Time-seriesPM10, NO2, O30–2GLM
Xia et al.2012China2001–2008Time-seriesPM100–1GAM
Huang et al.2012Xi’an, China2004–2008Time-seriesPM2.50–2GAM
Chen et al.2012China2001–2008Time-seriesNO20–1GLM
Chen et al.2012China2006–2009Time-seriesPM100–1GAM
Ma et al.2011Shenyang, China2006–2008Case-crossoverPM2.50–1GAM
Chen et al.2011China2006–2008Time-seriesPM2.5, PM100, 1, 2, 0–1, 0–2GLM
Qian et al.2010Xian, China2004–2008Time-seriesPM2.50–1GAM
Chen et al.2010Anshan, China2005–2007Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20, 6, 0–1, 0–6GAM
Chen et al.2010Shanghai, China.2005–2007Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20, 6, 0–1, 0–6GLM
Huang et al.2009Shanghai, China.2004–2005Time-seriesPM2.50GAM
Cao et al.2009Shanghai, China.2005–2007Time-seriesPM10, SO20, 6, 0–1, 0–6GLM
Wong et al.2008China2001–2004Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO2, O30–1GLM
Chen et al.2008Shanghai, China.2001–2004Time-seriesPM10, SO2, NO20–1GAM
Qian et al.2007Wuhan, China2001–2004Time-seriesPM10, O30, 4, 0–1, 0–4GAM
Kan et al.2007Shanghai, China2004–2005Time-seriesPM2.5, PM100–1GAM

GAM, Generalized additive model. GLM, Generalized linear model. Logistic, Logistic regression model.

GAM, Generalized additive model. GLM, Generalized linear model. Logistic, Logistic regression model.

Particulate matter and cardiovascular mortality

Overall, we noted significant positive associations between cardiovascular mortality and particulate matters (PM10, PM2.5). PM10, which was the most frequently reported air pollutant, showed a mean of 0.39% (95% CI: 0.26%–0.53%) increase in cardiovascular mortality risk per 10 μg/m3 increase in concentration, with a significant heterogeneity among studies (83.6%) (Figure 2). Pooled analysis suggested that the adverse impact of PM10 on cardiovascular mortality was independent of the duration of exposure (Figure 3).
Figure 2

Forest plot of the association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality

Figure 3

Accumulative meta-analysis of the association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality

PM2.5 was also significantly associated with a mean of 0.68% (95% CI: 0.39%–0.97%) increase in cardiovascular mortality per 10 μg/m3 increase in concentration, despite significant heterogeneity among studies (90.4%, Figure 4). No time-dependent effect was observed in the adverse impact of PM2.5 on cardiovascular mortality (Figure 5).
Figure 4

Forest plot of the association between PM10 and cardiovascular mortality

Figure 5

Accumulative meta-analysis of the association between PM10 and cardiovascular mortality

Gaseous air pollutants and cardiovascular mortality

Shot-term exposure to gaseous pollutants yielded robust association with cardiovascular mortality. (Table 2) For each 10 μg/m3 increase in O3 and SO2 concentration, pooled ERs of cardiovascular mortality was 0.62% (95% CI: 0.33%–0.92%) and 0.75% (95% CI: 0.42%–1.09%), respectively. Notably, NO2 conferred a 1.12% (95% CI: 0.76%–1.48%) increase in cardiovascular mortality per 10 μg/m3 increase in concentration. The heterogeneity was significant among studies reporting these gaseous pollutants (NO2, 66.9%; SO2, 74.2%; O3, 61.5%). For forest plots see details in Online Supplement.
Table 2

Pooled outcomes of the cardiovascular health effect of gaseous pollutants

NO2SO2O3
Number of estimates1296
ModelRandom-effectRandom-effectRandom-effect
Heterogeneity I2 (%)66.974.261.5
Summary ER (%) (95% CI)1.12 [0.76, 1.48]0.75 [0.42, 1.09]0.62 [0.33, 0.92]

ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different causes of mortality. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.

ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different causes of mortality. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.

Subgroup analysis

Subgroup analyses were conducted by stratifying the age, gender, the different lag patterns, temperature, and concentrations of air pollutants (Table 3). People aged greater than 65 years were more susceptible to the adverse impacts conferred by air pollution. Males appeared to be less susceptible to the adverse effects associated with air pollution. The more robust associations were seen at lag 1 day for all pollutants except for PM2.5. Among all pollutants, greater cardiovascular mortality was observed in lower temperature. In most of the sub-group analysis, the heterogeneity remained significant, except for the warm seasons.
Table 3

Subgroup-analysis of each pollutant and cardiovascular mortality

PollutantOutcomeNumber of estimatesHeterogeneity I2 (%)Statistics ModelSummary ER (%)(95% CI)
PM2.5
Lag 0449Random-effect0.40 [0.23, 0.58]
Lag 1390Random-effect0.14 [−0.23, 0.52]
Lag 2277Random-effect−0.01 [−0.22, 0.01]
Lag 0–1271Fixed-effect0.77 [0.42, 1.12]
Warm219Fixed-effect0.67 [0.21, 1.14]
Cool275Random-effect0.68 [−0.35, 1.71]
PM10
Lag 0976Random-effect0.27 [0.10, 0.44]
Lag 1680Random-effect0.35 [0.12, 0.59]
Lag 2463Random-effect0.03 [−0.21, 0.27]
Lag 0–11284Random-effect0.47 [0.30, 0.64]
Male373Random-effect0.30 [0.06, 0.55]
Female380Random-effect0.56 [0.14, 0.97]
Warm seasons473Random-effect0.44 [−0.07, 0.96]
Cool seasons480Random-effect0.46 [0.18, 0.73]
Age > 65 years578Random-effect0.50 [0.23, 0.76]
Age ≤ 65 years580Random-effect0.33 [0.01, 0.65]
NO2
Lag 0375Random-effect0.44 [−0.46, 1.34]
Lag 1277Random-effect1.11 [0.12, 2.11]
Lag 0–1886Random-effect1.33 [0.73, 1.93]
Male386Random-effect0.80 [0.08, 1.51]
Female364Random-effect1.08 [0.48, 1.69]
Warm seasons30Fixed-effect0.13 [−0.25, 0.50]
Cool seasons390Random-effect1.96 [0.33, 3.60]
Age > 65 years486Random-effect1.27 [0.55, 1.99]
Age ≤ 65 years450Fixed-effect0.40 [0.20, 0.61]
SO2
Lag 0387Random-effect0.38 [−0.45, 1.20]
Lag 1487Random-effect0.72 [0.05, 1.39]
Lag 2241Fixed-effect0.12 [−0.13, 0.38]
Lag 0–1882Random-effect0.61 [0.23, 1.00]
Male259Random-effect0.56 [0.08, 1.04]
Female287Random-effect0.99 [−0.10, 2.09]
Warm seasons33Fixed-effect0.21 [−0.01, 0.43]
Cool seasons386Random-effect1.28 [0.39, 2.18]
O3
Lag 2281Random-effect0.40 [−0.04, 0.84]
Lag 0–1276Random-effect1.51 [−1.32, 4.33]
Warm seasons336Fixed-effect0.43 [0.15, 0.71]
Cool seasons491Random-effect1.72 [−0.71, 4.15]

ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different lag times of mortality, different age groups, different genders and different temperature for each increment of 10 μg/m3 in pollutant concentrations. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter

ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different lag times of mortality, different age groups, different genders and different temperature for each increment of 10 μg/m3 in pollutant concentrations. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter

Publication bias

Funnel plots suggested symmetric distribution of studies (see Online Supplement). Begg’s and Egger’s test indicated insignificant publication bias for studies included in our analysis (Table 4).
Table 4

Assessment for publication bias stratified by gaseous and particulate air pollutants

PM2.5PM10NO2SO2O3
Number of estimates10171296
P value for Begg’s test0.0490.0580.6310.2510.060
P value for Egger’s test0.1240.7580.0200.6440.048

ER, Excess risk. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.

ER, Excess risk. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.

DISCUSSION

Cardiovascular diseases include disorders of the heart (arrhythmia, coronary vessel and vascular disease, heart failure) and blood vessels (peripheral arterial diseases and venous thrombosis), particularly the diseases related to vessels supplying blood to the brain (ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke). Taken together, these disorders constitute the leading cause of death across the globe, with low- and middle-income countries being most significantly affected. A substantial number of environmental factors have been found to exert a critical adverse impact on the risk, progression, and severity of cardiovascular diseases. There are growing concerns of cardiovascular mortality related to air pollution, although it remains poorly characterized in China. In this meta-analysis, we have pooled 30 epidemiological studies which focused on the association between short-term exposure to pollution and cardiovascular mortality, demonstrating positive correlations between air pollutant levels and cardiovascular mortality. Specifically, we observed 0.39% and 0.68% higher ERs for total cardiovascular mortality, per 10 μg/m3 increases in PM10 and PM2.5, respectively. Meanwhile, each 10 μg/m3 increase in NO2, SO2 and O3 was associated with 1.12%, 0.75% and 0.62% greater ERs in cardiovascular mortality. Similar outcomes were reported in a previous meta-analysis from China, in which each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10, PM2.5, SO2, NO2, and O3 concentrations corresponded to an increase in cardiovascular mortality by 0.43%, 0.44%, 0.85%, 1.46%, and 0.45%, respectively [21]. Another study has documented the increase of 0.36% and 0.63% per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 and PM2.5, which was also comparable to our findings [22]. Admittedly, pooled estimates of PM10 derived from developed countries were greater than that from China. Each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM10 was associated with 0.53% and 0.68% greater cardiovascular mortality in Europe [17] and USA [23], respectively. But our pooled estimates for PM2.5 of 0.68% appeared lower than those reported in developed countries. Per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, the pooled ERs were 0.85% for cardiovascular mortality in a multicity time-series analysis from 112 US cities [24]. In another time-series study from 27 US cities, each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 correlated with a pooled ER of 0.94% in cardiovascular mortality [18]. Because of significantly higher average of pollutants concentrations in Chinese cities, the exposure-response coefficient derived from western cities cannot be directly extrapolated to China. We noted greater adverse effects of PM2.5 on cardiovascular mortality than those of PM10, which has been supported by earlier epidemiological studies [25, 26]. A potential interpretation is that PM10 deposited preferentially in larger airways, whereas PM2.5 or ultrafine particulate matter could penetrate to more distal airways or even the alveoli [27, 28]. It has been proven that PM2.5 enters cardiovascular system via inhalation into the lungs, which promotes local inflammatory response that “spills over” into the circulation, where soluble and cellular mediators may promote systemic oxidative stress and inflammation that affect the heart and vessels [29]. This systemic effect can also be amplified by effects on adipose and liver tissue, promoting the release of adipokines and acute-phase reactants, which can alter vascular tone, resulting in insulin resistance, dyslipidemia and hypercoagulability [30]. Therefore, greater emphasis should be placed on the adverse effects conferred by PM2.5. Temperature is usually considered as a confounder of air pollution [31], and its impacts on cardiovascular mortality associated with air pollution remain controversial [32]. Consistent with previous studies [33, 34], we noted that low atmospheric temperature was associated with greater cardiovascular mortality, although confounding by other meteorological factors cannot be excluded. The altered cardiovascular biomarker profiles in healthy adults associated with ambient temperature changes may help explain the temperature-related cardiovascular mortality. A 10°C decrease at 2-d average daily temperature were associated with mean increases of 2.5%, 1.6%, 2.7%, 5.5% and 2.0% in biomarker levels for systemic inflammation, coagulation, systemic oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and endothelial function, respectively [35]. We also observed greater adverse cardiovascular mortality in females than in males, although previous studies yielded conflicting results [36]. These findings indicated that effect-modifiers should be taken into account when interpreting the impact of air pollutants on cardiovascular mortality. Except for metropolitans, the adverse effects conferred by air pollutants remain significant in other cities of northwest China. More stringent regulations on improving air quality, coupled with implementation of routine atmosphere monitoring, are urgently needed. In light of different impacts on cardiovascular mortality, we propose nation-wide dynamic monitoring of pollutant levels, which will better inform citizens at risk of developing cardiovascular events in case of abrupt increase in pollutant levels. Limitations of our study include the significant heterogeneity among all pollutants except for PM2.5 and O3. Factors that could potentially explain for the significant heterogeneity may include different study designs and methods for statistical analysis, the diverse population characteristics, diverse regions where study participants are residing, and the methods for measurement and recording, etc. However, pooled estimates showed consistently remarkable adverse effect among all pollutants, and the effect size was unchanged in subgroup analyses. We only calculated pooled estimates based on single-pollutant model without adjustment. The effects of air pollution on cardiovascular mortality might have been overestimated because our pooled estimates were merely based on short-term exposures to air pollution. Our study estimated the health effect on more general population; however, the effects were likely to be greater in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular diseases. Finally, most cities in our study were mega-cities that harbored dense population, therefore it remains unclear whether our findings could be extrapolated to cities with smaller scales. In summary, short-term exposure of air pollution is associated with greater cardiovascular mortality. Our results reinforce the public health importance of surveillance of air pollution, which would help inform policy-makers to establish more stringent regulations that would mitigate air pollutant levels. Despite small pooled estimates, the impact is substantial for the entire population. More high-quality studies in China are urgently needed to identify the exposure-response effect in order to determine the susceptible population, making relevant policy for further prevention of the detrimental effects due to air pollution.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Literature search and selection

Systematic literature search was performed for epidemiological studies conducted in China that examined cardiovascular disease mortality and hospital admissions in association with short-term exposure to air pollutants, including particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5) and gaseous pollutants (NO2, SO2, O3). We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane library, Wan Fang, and CNKI databases for literature published in English or Chinese, up to January 2017, using the terms: (1) PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, O3, air pollutants, air pollution; (2) Cardiovascular diseases, adverse effect, mortality, death; (3) time-series, case-crossover, cohort studies; (4) China, Chinese. Additional literature was manually retrieved to identify studies not included during the initial search. Selection of studies was based on viewing the titles, abstracts and full-length articles. We focused on time-series or case-crossover studies that reported excess risk (ER) and the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of cardiovascular mortality in association with short-term exposure to air pollutants (NO2, SO2, O3, PM2.5, and PM10) in China. Only single-pollutant model results and studies on human were included. Following inclusion criteria were used: (1) All epidemiological studies, involved the health impact of exposure to mentioned pollutants in the Chinese population; (2) original studies expressed quantitative exposure–response relationships between mentioned pollutants and cardiovascular health outcomes (excess risk[ER], and their 95%confidence intervals [95% CI]); (3) subjects were not from specific high-risk groups (e.g. smokers or children); (4) the health outcomes were cardiovascular mortality.

Data extraction and meta-analysis

Data were extracted independently by two investigators (H.R.L and F.Y.C.) and discrepancy was adjudicated by a third investigator (L.Z.). For selected studies, the title, authors, location, year of publication, study period, study design, number of events, type of pollutants and health outcomes were extracted and entered into an electronic database. Association between short-term exposure of air pollution and cardiovascular mortality was frequently determined for the duration of several days prior to the events, showing the estimates as single time lags (e.g. lag 1) or cumulative lags (e.g. lag 0–1 or 0–2). For eligible studies, we selected the lags to pooled risk estimates with the following rules: 1) the estimate could be directly included if only one lag estimate was presented; 2) if multiple lags were presented, we sequentially selected with the following criteria: [37, 38] (a) the a-priori lag; (2) the lag with the greatest statistical significance; (3) the lag with the largest effect estimate; (4) the lag with the shortest period. We did subgroup analyses according to different lag patterns (0, 1, 2, 0–1, 0–2 days), age (≤ 65 vs. > 65 years), gender (male vs. female), and temperature (warm vs. cold). Excess risks (ERs) were pooled for standardized estimates with incremental concentration of 10 μg/m3 [22]. We used Cochran’s X2 test and I2 to examine the heterogeneity among effect estimates [39]. P > 0.05 indicated homogeneity, otherwise heterogeneity among estimates. I2 statistics of 0∼25, 25∼50 and > 50 indicated low, moderate, and significant heterogeneity, respectively [40]. We chose I2 > 50 as an indicator of significant heterogeneity. Random-effect model was applied to pool estimates in case of significant heterogeneity; otherwise, fixed-effect model was applied [39]. Study bias was detected using funnel plot, based on Begg’s and Egger’s test [41, 42]. Statistical significance was taken for P < 0.05. All analyses were conducted with STATA version 12.0 (Stata Corporation College Station, TX, USA).
  41 in total

Review 1.  Air pollution and health.

Authors:  Bert Brunekreef; Stephen T Holgate
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Test had 10% false positive rate.

Authors:  V Seagroatt; I Stratton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-02-07

Review 3.  Systematic review of Chinese studies of short-term exposure to air pollution and daily mortality.

Authors:  Yu Shang; Zhiwei Sun; Junji Cao; Xinming Wang; Liuju Zhong; Xinhui Bi; Hong Li; Wenxin Liu; Tong Zhu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 9.621

Review 4.  Impact of air pollution on the burden of chronic respiratory diseases in China: time for urgent action.

Authors:  Wei-Jie Guan; Xue-Yan Zheng; Kian Fan Chung; Nan-Shan Zhong
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2016-10-15       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Seasonal pattern of the acute mortality effects of air pollution.

Authors:  Zhengmin Qian; Hung-Mo Lin; Walter F Stewart; Linli Kong; Fen Xu; Denjin Zhou; Zhicao Zhu; Shengwen Liang; Weiqing Chen; Nirav Shah; Christy Stetter; Qingci He
Journal:  J Air Waste Manag Assoc       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 2.235

6.  Ambient temperature and cardiovascular biomarkers in a repeated-measure study in healthy adults: A novel biomarker index approach.

Authors:  Shaowei Wu; Di Yang; Lu Pan; Jiao Shan; Hongyu Li; Hongying Wei; Bin Wang; Jing Huang; Andrea A Baccarelli; Masayuki Shima; Furong Deng; Xinbiao Guo
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 6.498

7.  Ambient particulate matter and health effects: publication bias in studies of short-term associations.

Authors:  H Ross Anderson; Richard W Atkinson; Janet L Peacock; Michael J Sweeting; Louise Marston
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.822

8.  Outdoor air pollution and respiratory health in Asia.

Authors:  Kian Fan Chung; Junfeng Zhang; Nanshan Zhong
Journal:  Respirology       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.424

9.  Global, regional, and national age-sex specific all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 240 causes of death, 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-12-18       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 10.  Global association of air pollution and heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anoop S V Shah; Jeremy P Langrish; Harish Nair; David A McAllister; Amanda L Hunter; Ken Donaldson; David E Newby; Nicholas L Mills
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2013-07-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  18 in total

1.  The association between short and long-term exposure to PM2.5 and temperature and hospital admissions in New England and the synergistic effect of the short-term exposures.

Authors:  Maayan Yitshak-Sade; Jennifer F Bobb; Joel D Schwartz; Itai Kloog; Antonella Zanobetti
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2018-05-26       Impact factor: 7.963

2.  Enhanced mitochondrial DNA repair of the common disease-associated variant, Ser326Cys, of hOGG1 through small molecule intervention.

Authors:  Beverly A Baptiste; Steven R Katchur; Elayne M Fivenson; Deborah L Croteau; William L Rumsey; Vilhelm A Bohr
Journal:  Free Radic Biol Med       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 7.376

3.  Myeloperoxidase mediated HDL oxidation and HDL proteome changes do not contribute to dysfunctional HDL in Chinese subjects with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Guisong Wang; Anna Vachaparampil Mathew; Haiyi Yu; Lei Li; Liyun He; Wei Gao; Xiaodan Liu; Yanhong Guo; Jaeman Byun; Jifeng Zhang; Y Eugene Chen; Subramaniam Pennathur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Outdoor air pollution and respiratory health: a bibliometric analysis of publications in peer-reviewed journals (1900 - 2017).

Authors:  Waleed M Sweileh; Samah W Al-Jabi; Sa'ed H Zyoud; Ansam F Sawalha
Journal:  Multidiscip Respir Med       Date:  2018-06-01

5.  Association between ambient PM2.5 and emergency department visits for psychiatric emergency diseases.

Authors:  Sung Hyun Kim; Sang Do Shin; Kyoung Jun Song; Young Sun Ro; So Yeon Kong; Jeongeun Kim; Seo Young Ko; Sun Young Lee
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-24       Impact factor: 2.469

6.  PM2.5 exposure on daily cardio-respiratory mortality in Lima, Peru, from 2010 to 2016.

Authors:  Vilma Tapia; Kyle Steenland; Bryan Vu; Yang Liu; Vanessa Vásquez; Gustavo F Gonzales
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.984

7.  Short-Term Associations of Fine Particulate Matter and Synoptic Weather Types with Cardiovascular Mortality: An Ecological Time-Series Study in Shanghai, China.

Authors:  Qing Tian; Mei Li; Scott Montgomery; Bo Fang; Chunfang Wang; Tian Xia; Yang Cao
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Ischaemic heart disease and stroke mortality by specific coal type among non-smoking women with substantial indoor air pollution exposure in China.

Authors:  Bryan A Bassig; H Dean Hosgood; Xiao-Ou Shu; Roel Vermeulen; Bingshu E Chen; Hormuzd A Katki; Wei Jie Seow; Wei Hu; Lützen Portengen; Bu-Tian Ji; Jason Y Y Wong; Bofu Ning; George S Downward; Jihua Li; Kaiyun Yang; Gong Yang; Yu-Tang Gao; Yong-Bing Xiang; Teja Nagaradona; Wei Zheng; Debra T Silverman; Yunchao Huang; Qing Lan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 9.  In Vitro and In Vivo Experimental Studies of PM2.5 on Disease Progression.

Authors:  Ching-Chang Cho; Wen-Yeh Hsieh; Chin-Hung Tsai; Cheng-Yi Chen; Hui-Fang Chang; Chih-Sheng Lin
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 10.  Novel evidence for a greater burden of ambient air pollution on cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  Pier Mannuccio Mannucci; Sergio Harari; Massimo Franchini
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 9.941

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.