| Literature DB >> 29029525 |
Lei Zhao1,2, Heng-Rui Liang3, Feng-Ying Chen1, Zi Chen4,5, Wei-Jie Guan6, Jian-Hua Li1.
Abstract
Air pollutant levels in many Chinese cities remained significantly higher than the upper limits stated in World Health Organization guidelines. In light of limited evidence in China, we conducted a meta-analysis summarizing the association between acute exposure of air pollution and cardiovascular mortality. We searched PubMed, and CNKI databases etc. for literature published in English or Chinese up to January 2017. Outcomes were pooled and compared using random-effects model. Excess risks (ERs) per 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2 and O3 were evaluated. Subgroup analysis was conducted according to lag patterns (lags 0, 1, 2, 0-1, 0-2 days), gender (male vs. female), temperature (cool vs. warm) and age (< 65 vs. ≥ 65). Study bias was detected using Begg's and Egger's test. Of 299 articles identified, 30 met inclusion criteria. Each 10 μg/m3 increase in the concentration was associated with a higher incidence of cardiovascular mortality for PM2.5 (0.68%, 95% CI: 0.39-0.97%), PM10 (0.39%, 95% CI: 0.26-0.53%), NO2 (1.12%, 95% CI: 0.76-1.48%), SO2 (0.75%, 95% CI: 0.42-1.09%), and O3 (0.62%, 95% CI: 0.33-0.92%), respectively. Air pollution conferred greater adverse impacts on cardiovascular mortality for longer duration of exposures. Strongest associations were seen for lag 0-1 day of exposure among all pollutants. Female, lower temperature, and age > 65 years were associated with greater risks of cardiovascular mortality for all pollutants. Higher concentrations of air pollutants correlated with a greater short-term increase in cardiovascular mortality. Further high-quality studies in China are urgently warranted to determine the susceptible population, which would offer reference for policy-making to minimize adverse health effects.Entities:
Keywords: China; air pollution; cardiovascular; meta-analysis; mortality
Year: 2017 PMID: 29029525 PMCID: PMC5630425 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.20090
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncotarget ISSN: 1949-2553
Figure 1Flow chart of literature search and criterion for inclusion and exclusion of studies
Contextual details of studies included in the meta-analysis
| Study | Year | City | Study period | Study design | Air pollutant | Lags exposure | Model |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xu et al. | 2017 | Beijing, China | 2013 | Time-series | PM2.5, NO2, SO2, O3, CO | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 0–1, 0–3, 0–5 | GAM |
| Qin et al. | 2016 | Zhengzhou, China | 2013–2015 | Time-series | O3 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Lin et al. | 2016 | China | 2013–2015 | Time-series | PM2.5, SO2, NO2, O3 | 0–3 | GAM |
| Xie et al. | 2015 | Beijing, China | 2010–2012 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 0–2, 0–4 | GAM |
| Li et al. | 2015 | Beijing, China | 2005–2009 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 1,2 | GAM |
| Zhang et al. | 2014 | Guangzhou, China | 2008–2011 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0–5 | GAM |
| Tong et al. | 2014 | Tianjin, China | 2008–2011 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0, 0–1 | GLM |
| Yu et al. | 2013 | Hong Kong, China | 1998–2007 | Time-series | PM10, NO2 | 0–3 | GAM |
| Wang et al. | 2013 | Tianjin, China | 2006–2010 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0, 1, 2, 0–3 | GAM |
| Huang et al. | 2013 | Hong Kong, China | 1998–2007 | Time-series | PM10, NO2, O3, SO2 | 0, 1, 0–3 | GAM |
| Geng et al. | 2013 | Shanghai, China. | 2007–2008 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 3 | NG |
| Yu et al. | 2012 | Guangzhou, China | 2006–2009 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Yang et al. | 2012 | Suzhou, China | 2006–2008 | Time-series | O3 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Yang et al. | 2012 | Guangzhou, China | 2007–2008 | Case-crossover | PM2.5 | 0–1 | Logistic |
| Tao et al. | 2012 | China | 2006–2008 | Time-series | PM10, NO2, O3 | 0–2 | GLM |
| Xia et al. | 2012 | China | 2001–2008 | Time-series | PM10 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Huang et al. | 2012 | Xi’an, China | 2004–2008 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 0–2 | GAM |
| Chen et al. | 2012 | China | 2001–2008 | Time-series | NO2 | 0–1 | GLM |
| Chen et al. | 2012 | China | 2006–2009 | Time-series | PM10 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Ma et al. | 2011 | Shenyang, China | 2006–2008 | Case-crossover | PM2.5 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Chen et al. | 2011 | China | 2006–2008 | Time-series | PM2.5, PM10 | 0, 1, 2, 0–1, 0–2 | GLM |
| Qian et al. | 2010 | Xian, China | 2004–2008 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Chen et al. | 2010 | Anshan, China | 2005–2007 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0, 6, 0–1, 0–6 | GAM |
| Chen et al. | 2010 | Shanghai, China. | 2005–2007 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0, 6, 0–1, 0–6 | GLM |
| Huang et al. | 2009 | Shanghai, China. | 2004–2005 | Time-series | PM2.5 | 0 | GAM |
| Cao et al. | 2009 | Shanghai, China. | 2005–2007 | Time-series | PM10, SO2 | 0, 6, 0–1, 0–6 | GLM |
| Wong et al. | 2008 | China | 2001–2004 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2, O3 | 0–1 | GLM |
| Chen et al. | 2008 | Shanghai, China. | 2001–2004 | Time-series | PM10, SO2, NO2 | 0–1 | GAM |
| Qian et al. | 2007 | Wuhan, China | 2001–2004 | Time-series | PM10, O3 | 0, 4, 0–1, 0–4 | GAM |
| Kan et al. | 2007 | Shanghai, China | 2004–2005 | Time-series | PM2.5, PM10 | 0–1 | GAM |
GAM, Generalized additive model. GLM, Generalized linear model. Logistic, Logistic regression model.
Figure 2Forest plot of the association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality
Figure 3Accumulative meta-analysis of the association between PM2.5 and cardiovascular mortality
Figure 4Forest plot of the association between PM10 and cardiovascular mortality
Figure 5Accumulative meta-analysis of the association between PM10 and cardiovascular mortality
Pooled outcomes of the cardiovascular health effect of gaseous pollutants
| NO2 | SO2 | O3 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12 | 9 | 6 | |
| Random-effect | Random-effect | Random-effect | |
| 66.9 | 74.2 | 61.5 | |
| 1.12 [0.76, 1.48] | 0.75 [0.42, 1.09] | 0.62 [0.33, 0.92] |
ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different causes of mortality. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.
Subgroup-analysis of each pollutant and cardiovascular mortality
| Pollutant | Outcome | Number of estimates | Heterogeneity I2 (%) | Statistics Model | Summary ER (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | |||||
| Lag 0 | 4 | 49 | Random-effect | 0.40 [0.23, 0.58] | |
| Lag 1 | 3 | 90 | Random-effect | 0.14 [−0.23, 0.52] | |
| Lag 2 | 2 | 77 | Random-effect | −0.01 [−0.22, 0.01] | |
| Lag 0–1 | 2 | 71 | Fixed-effect | 0.77 [0.42, 1.12] | |
| Warm | 2 | 19 | Fixed-effect | 0.67 [0.21, 1.14] | |
| Cool | 2 | 75 | Random-effect | 0.68 [−0.35, 1.71] | |
| PM10 | |||||
| Lag 0 | 9 | 76 | Random-effect | 0.27 [0.10, 0.44] | |
| Lag 1 | 6 | 80 | Random-effect | 0.35 [0.12, 0.59] | |
| Lag 2 | 4 | 63 | Random-effect | 0.03 [−0.21, 0.27] | |
| Lag 0–1 | 12 | 84 | Random-effect | 0.47 [0.30, 0.64] | |
| Male | 3 | 73 | Random-effect | 0.30 [0.06, 0.55] | |
| Female | 3 | 80 | Random-effect | 0.56 [0.14, 0.97] | |
| Warm seasons | 4 | 73 | Random-effect | 0.44 [−0.07, 0.96] | |
| Cool seasons | 4 | 80 | Random-effect | 0.46 [0.18, 0.73] | |
| Age > 65 years | 5 | 78 | Random-effect | 0.50 [0.23, 0.76] | |
| Age ≤ 65 years | 5 | 80 | Random-effect | 0.33 [0.01, 0.65] | |
| NO2 | |||||
| Lag 0 | 3 | 75 | Random-effect | 0.44 [−0.46, 1.34] | |
| Lag 1 | 2 | 77 | Random-effect | 1.11 [0.12, 2.11] | |
| Lag 0–1 | 8 | 86 | Random-effect | 1.33 [0.73, 1.93] | |
| Male | 3 | 86 | Random-effect | 0.80 [0.08, 1.51] | |
| Female | 3 | 64 | Random-effect | 1.08 [0.48, 1.69] | |
| Warm seasons | 3 | 0 | Fixed-effect | 0.13 [−0.25, 0.50] | |
| Cool seasons | 3 | 90 | Random-effect | 1.96 [0.33, 3.60] | |
| Age > 65 years | 4 | 86 | Random-effect | 1.27 [0.55, 1.99] | |
| Age ≤ 65 years | 4 | 50 | Fixed-effect | 0.40 [0.20, 0.61] | |
| SO2 | |||||
| Lag 0 | 3 | 87 | Random-effect | 0.38 [−0.45, 1.20] | |
| Lag 1 | 4 | 87 | Random-effect | 0.72 [0.05, 1.39] | |
| Lag 2 | 2 | 41 | Fixed-effect | 0.12 [−0.13, 0.38] | |
| Lag 0–1 | 8 | 82 | Random-effect | 0.61 [0.23, 1.00] | |
| Male | 2 | 59 | Random-effect | 0.56 [0.08, 1.04] | |
| Female | 2 | 87 | Random-effect | 0.99 [−0.10, 2.09] | |
| Warm seasons | 3 | 3 | Fixed-effect | 0.21 [−0.01, 0.43] | |
| Cool seasons | 3 | 86 | Random-effect | 1.28 [0.39, 2.18] | |
| O3 | |||||
| Lag 2 | 2 | 81 | Random-effect | 0.40 [−0.04, 0.84] | |
| Lag 0–1 | 2 | 76 | Random-effect | 1.51 [−1.32, 4.33] | |
| Warm seasons | 3 | 36 | Fixed-effect | 0.43 [0.15, 0.71] | |
| Cool seasons | 4 | 91 | Random-effect | 1.72 [−0.71, 4.15] |
ER, Excess risk (ER) percentages and 95% confidence intervals for different lag times of mortality, different age groups, different genders and different temperature for each increment of 10 μg/m3 in pollutant concentrations. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter
Assessment for publication bias stratified by gaseous and particulate air pollutants
| PM2.5 | PM10 | NO2 | SO2 | O3 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 | 17 | 12 | 9 | 6 | |
| 0.049 | 0.058 | 0.631 | 0.251 | 0.060 | |
| 0.124 | 0.758 | 0.020 | 0.644 | 0.048 |
ER, Excess risk. CI, confidence interval. PM, Particulate matter.