Amal A Wanigatunga1,2, Eleanor M Simonsick3, Vadim Zipunnikov4, Adam P Spira2,5,6, Stephanie Studenski3, Luigi Ferrucci3, Jennifer A Schrack1,2. 1. Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 2. Center on Aging and Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Aging, Baltimore, Maryland. 4. Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 5. Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland. 6. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Abstract
Background: Fatigability, defined as fatigue in relation to a standardized task, predicts functional decline in older adults independent of reported tiredness or energy level. Although the sensation of fatigue, tiredness, and energy level adversely affect physical activity (PA), the association between fatigability and objectively measured PA is unknown. Methods: Participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 557, 50% women, aged 50-97 years) were instructed to wear an Actiheart accelerometer for 7 consecutive days in the free-living environment. Perceived fatigability was assessed using the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) after 5 minutes of treadmill walking at 1.5 mph (0.67 m/s) and categorized as low (6-7 RPE), intermediate (8-9 RPE), and high (10+ RPE) fatigability. Time-of-day PA differences between fatigability groups were assessed using mixed-effects modeling. Results: Total daily PA was 1.3% lower for every unit increment in perceived fatigability after adjusting for demographic, behavioral, and medical factors (p = .01). In time-of-day analyses, the high fatigability group was less active compared to the low fatigability group throughout the day (8:00 am to 8:00 pm) and the intermediate fatigability group in the morning (8:00 am to 12:00 pm). Patterns of PA within the high fatigability group differed from both the intermediate and low groups in the morning but mirrored the intermediate group in the afternoon and evening. Discussion: These results suggest that RPE is a bio-marker of fatigability associated with progressively lower PA with aging. Whether the effects of fatigability occurring at the end of the day reflect waning energy levels or a voluntary choice that could be modified remains to be evaluated.
Background: Fatigability, defined as fatigue in relation to a standardized task, predicts functional decline in older adults independent of reported tiredness or energy level. Although the sensation of fatigue, tiredness, and energy level adversely affect physical activity (PA), the association between fatigability and objectively measured PA is unknown. Methods:Participants in the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging (n = 557, 50% women, aged 50-97 years) were instructed to wear an Actiheart accelerometer for 7 consecutive days in the free-living environment. Perceived fatigability was assessed using the Borg rating of perceived exertion (RPE) after 5 minutes of treadmill walking at 1.5 mph (0.67 m/s) and categorized as low (6-7 RPE), intermediate (8-9 RPE), and high (10+ RPE) fatigability. Time-of-day PA differences between fatigability groups were assessed using mixed-effects modeling. Results: Total daily PA was 1.3% lower for every unit increment in perceived fatigability after adjusting for demographic, behavioral, and medical factors (p = .01). In time-of-day analyses, the high fatigability group was less active compared to the low fatigability group throughout the day (8:00 am to 8:00 pm) and the intermediate fatigability group in the morning (8:00 am to 12:00 pm). Patterns of PA within the high fatigability group differed from both the intermediate and low groups in the morning but mirrored the intermediate group in the afternoon and evening. Discussion: These results suggest that RPE is a bio-marker of fatigability associated with progressively lower PA with aging. Whether the effects of fatigability occurring at the end of the day reflect waning energy levels or a voluntary choice that could be modified remains to be evaluated.
Authors: Jennifer A Schrack; Vadim Zipunnikov; Jeff Goldsmith; Jiawei Bai; Eleanor M Simonsick; Ciprian Crainiceanu; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2013-12-14 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: L P Fried; C M Tangen; J Walston; A B Newman; C Hirsch; J Gottdiener; T Seeman; R Tracy; W J Kop; G Burke; M A McBurnie Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: John F Schnelle; Maciej S Buchowski; Talat A Ikizler; Daniel W Durkin; Linda Beuscher; Sandra F Simmons Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-08-02 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Diba Mani; Awad M Almuklass; Landon D Hamilton; Taian M Vieira; Alberto Botter; Roger M Enoka Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2018-07-25 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Amal A Wanigatunga; Ravi Varadhan; Eleanor M Simonsick; Olga D Carlson; Stephanie Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci; Jennifer A Schrack Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2019-04-23 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Junrui Di; Adam Spira; Jiawei Bai; Jacek Urbanek; Andrew Leroux; Mark Wu; Susan Resnick; Eleanor Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Jennifer Schrack; Vadim Zipunnikov Journal: Stat Biosci Date: 2019-04-15
Authors: Eleanor M Simonsick; Jennifer A Schrack; Adam J Santanasto; Stephanie A Studenski; Luigi Ferrucci; Nancy W Glynn Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2018-10-13 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jennifer A Schrack; Amal A Wanigatunga; Vadim Zipunnikov; Pei-Lun Kuo; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Amal A Wanigatunga; Gillian K Gresham; Pei-Lun Kuo; Pablo Martinez-Amezcua; Vadim Zipunnikov; Sydney M Dy; Eleanor M Simonsick; Luigi Ferrucci; Jennifer A Schrack Journal: Cancer Date: 2018-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Kelsea R LaSorda; Theresa Gmelin; Allison L Kuipers; Robert M Boudreau; Adam J Santanasto; Kaare Christensen; Sharon W Renner; Mary K Wojczynski; Stacy L Andersen; Stephanie Cosentino; Nancy W Glynn Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 6.053