Paul D Blischak1, Laura S Kubatko1,2, Andrea D Wolfe1. 1. Department of Evolution, Ecology, and Organismal Biology. 2. Department of Statistics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Abstract
Motivation: Genotyping and parameter estimation using high throughput sequencing data are everyday tasks for population geneticists, but methods developed for diploids are typically not applicable to polyploid taxa. This is due to their duplicated chromosomes, as well as the complex patterns of allelic exchange that often accompany whole genome duplication (WGD) events. For WGDs within a single lineage (autopolyploids), inbreeding can result from mixed mating and/or double reduction. For WGDs that involve hybridization (allopolyploids), alleles are typically inherited through independently segregating subgenomes. Results: We present two new models for estimating genotypes and population genetic parameters from genotype likelihoods for auto- and allopolyploids. We then use simulations to compare these models to existing approaches at varying depths of sequencing coverage and ploidy levels. These simulations show that our models typically have lower levels of estimation error for genotype and parameter estimates, especially when sequencing coverage is low. Finally, we also apply these models to two empirical datasets from the literature. Overall, we show that the use of genotype likelihoods to model non-standard inheritance patterns is a promising approach for conducting population genomic inferences in polyploids. Availability and implementation: A C ++ program, EBG, is provided to perform inference using the models we describe. It is available under the GNU GPLv3 on GitHub: https://github.com/pblischak/polyploid-genotyping. Contact: blischak.4@osu.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Motivation: Genotyping and parameter estimation using high throughput sequencing data are everyday tasks for population geneticists, but methods developed for diploids are typically not applicable to polyploid taxa. This is due to their duplicated chromosomes, as well as the complex patterns of allelic exchange that often accompany whole genome duplication (WGD) events. For WGDs within a single lineage (autopolyploids), inbreeding can result from mixed mating and/or double reduction. For WGDs that involve hybridization (allopolyploids), alleles are typically inherited through independently segregating subgenomes. Results: We present two new models for estimating genotypes and population genetic parameters from genotype likelihoods for auto- and allopolyploids. We then use simulations to compare these models to existing approaches at varying depths of sequencing coverage and ploidy levels. These simulations show that our models typically have lower levels of estimation error for genotype and parameter estimates, especially when sequencing coverage is low. Finally, we also apply these models to two empirical datasets from the literature. Overall, we show that the use of genotype likelihoods to model non-standard inheritance patterns is a promising approach for conducting population genomic inferences in polyploids. Availability and implementation: A C ++ program, EBG, is provided to perform inference using the models we describe. It is available under the GNU GPLv3 on GitHub: https://github.com/pblischak/polyploid-genotyping. Contact: blischak.4@osu.edu. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Authors: David Gerard; Luis Felipe Ventorim Ferrão; Antonio Augusto Franco Garcia; Matthew Stephens Journal: Genetics Date: 2018-09-05 Impact factor: 4.562
Authors: Marie K Brandrud; Juliane Baar; Maria T Lorenzo; Alexander Athanasiadis; Richard M Bateman; Mark W Chase; Mikael Hedrén; Ovidiu Paun Journal: Syst Biol Date: 2020-01-01 Impact factor: 9.160
Authors: Dorcus C Gemenet; Mercy N Kitavi; Maria David; Dorcah Ndege; Reuben T Ssali; Jolien Swanckaert; Godwill Makunde; G Craig Yencho; Wolfgang Gruneberg; Edward Carey; Robert O Mwanga; Maria I Andrade; Simon Heck; Hugo Campos Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-24 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Muhammad Ahmad; Thibault Leroy; Nikos Krigas; Eva M Temsch; Hanna Weiss-Schneeweiss; Christian Lexer; Eva Maria Sehr; Ovidiu Paun Journal: Front Plant Sci Date: 2021-07-14 Impact factor: 5.753