Literature DB >> 24093466

Endoscope-assisted spinal decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Akihito Minamide1, Munehito Yoshida, Hiroshi Yamada, Yukihiro Nakagawa, Masaki Kawai, Kazuhiro Maio, Hiroshi Hashizume, Hiroshi Iwasaki, Shunji Tsutsui.   

Abstract

OBJECT: The authors undertook this study to document the clinical outcomes of microendoscopic laminotomy, a minimally invasive decompressive surgical technique using spinal endoscopy for lumbar decompression, in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS).
METHODS: A total of 366 patients were enrolled in the study and underwent microendoscopic laminotomy between 2007 and 2010. Indications for surgery were single- or double-level LSS, persistent neurological symptoms, and failure of conservative treatment. Microendoscopy provided wide visualization through oblique lenses and allowed bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach, through partial resection of the base of the spinous process, thereby preserving the supraspinous and interspinous ligaments and contralateral musculature. Clinical symptoms and signs of low-back pain were evaluated prior to and following surgical intervention by applying the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scoring system, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). These items were evaluated preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively.
RESULTS: Effective circumferential decompression was achieved in all patients. The 2-year follow-up evaluation was completed for 310 patients (148 men and 162 women; mean age 68.7 years). The average recovery rate based on the JOA score was 61.3%. The overall results were excellent in 34.9% of the patients, good in 34.9%, fair in 21.7%, and poor in 8.5%. The mean RMDQ score significantly improved from 11.3 to 4.8 (p < 0.001). In all categories of both JOABPEQ and SF-36, scores at 2 years' follow-up were significantly higher than those obtained before surgery (p < 0.001). Twelve surgery-related complications were identified: dural tear (6 cases [1.9%]), wrong-level operation (1 [0.3%]), transient neuralgia (4 [1.3%]), and infection (1 [0.3%]). All patients recovered, and there were no serious postoperative complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Microendoscopic laminotomy is a safe and very effective minimally invasive surgical technique for the treatment of degenerative LSS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24093466     DOI: 10.3171/2013.8.SPINE13125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine        ISSN: 1547-5646


  20 in total

1.  Full Endoscopic Spinal Surgery Techniques: Advancements, Indications, and Outcomes.

Authors:  James J Yue; William Long
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-05-20

2.  Clinical outcomes after microendoscopic laminotomy for lumbar spinal stenosis: a 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Akihito Minamide; Munehito Yoshida; Hiroshi Yamada; Yukihiro Nakagawa; Hiroshi Hashizume; Hiroshi Iwasaki; Shunji Tsutsui
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Minimally invasive techniques for lumbar decompressions and fusions.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Jonathan S Markowitz; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2017-12

4.  Comparison of Microendoscopic Laminotomy (MEL) Versus Spinous Process-Splitting Laminotomy (SPSL) for Multi Segmental Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Ryunosuke Oyama; Takeshi Arizono; Akihiko Inokuchi; Ryuta Imamura; Takahiro Hamada; Hirofumi Bekki
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-02-09

5.  Clinical Application of Large Channel Endoscopic Systems with Full Endoscopic Visualization Technique in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shuo Han; Xiangxu Zeng; Kai Zhu; Xiaoqi Wu; Yanqing Shen; Jialuo Han; Antao Lin; Shengwei Meng; Hao Zhang; Guanghui Li; Xiaojie Liu; Hao Tao; Xuexiao Ma; Chuanli Zhou
Journal:  Pain Ther       Date:  2022-09-03

6.  A protective method to reduce radiation exposure to the surgeon during endoscopic lumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Keisuske Ishii; Hiroki Iwai; Hiroyuki Oka; Katsutoshi Otomo; Hirohiko Inanami
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

7.  [Comparison of different transforaminal endoscope approaches in treatment of serious lumbar disc herniation].

Authors:  Hu Yang; Pengfei Li; Nan Jia; Jinxing Wang; Xianhui Jin
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2020-03-15

8.  Prognostic Factors of Surgical Outcome after Spinous Process-Splitting Laminectomy for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Keishi Maruo; Toshiya Tachibana; Shinichi Inoue; Fumihiro Arizumi; Shinichi Yoshiya
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2015-09-22

9.  Postoperative Spinal Subdural Lesions Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Yukitaka Nagamoto; Shota Takenaka; Hiroyuki Aono
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2017-10-11

10.  Microendoscope-Assisted Decompression Surgery With Resection of Bony Fragment for Treating a Separation of Lumbar Posterior Ring Apophysis in Young Athletes.

Authors:  Motohiro Okada; Munehito Yoshida; Akihito Minamide; Kazunori Nomura; Kazuhiro Maio; Hiroshi Yamada
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-06-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.