Literature DB >> 29027567

Commentary on: Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial.

Alexandra Mowat1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2017        PMID： 29027567     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-017-3490-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  5 in total

1.  Laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexies: a comparative cohort study.

Authors:  Marie Fidela R Paraiso; Mark D Walters; Raymond R Rackley; Seham Melek; Cathy Hugney
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Elisabetta Costantini; Luigi Mearini; Massimo Lazzeri; Vittorio Bini; Elisabetta Nunzi; Manuel di Biase; Massimo Porena
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  A randomised controlled trial of abdominal versus laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for the treatment of post-hysterectomy vaginal vault prolapse: LAS study.

Authors:  R M Freeman; K Pantazis; A Thomson; J Frappell; L Bombieri; P Moran; M Slack; P Scott; M Waterfield
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2012-08-03       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  A comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal sacral colpopexy: objective outcome and perioperative differences.

Authors:  Jennifer L Klauschie; Brent A Suozzi; Maureen M O'Brien; Andrew W McBride
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-11-18

5.  Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy compared with open abdominal sacrocolpopexy for vault prolapse repair: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Anne-Lotte W M Coolen; Anique M J van Oudheusden; Ben Willem J Mol; Hugo W F van Eijndhoven; Jan-Paul W R Roovers; Marlies Y Bongers
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 2.894
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.