Eva M Tanner1, Michael S Bloom1,2, Qian Wu3, Kurunthachalam Kannan1,3, Recai M Yucel2, Srishti Shrestha2, Edward F Fitzgerald4,5. 1. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, One University Place, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA. 2. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, One University Place, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA. 3. Division of Environmental Health Sciences, Wadsworth Center, New York State Department of Health, Albany, NY, 12201, USA. 4. Department of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, One University Place, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA. efitzgerald@albany.edu. 5. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, One University Place, Rensselaer, NY, 12144, USA. efitzgerald@albany.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are environmentally persistent amphiphilic compounds. Exposure to two PFASs, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is linked to specific occupations and industries. This study examines the contribution of past occupational PFAS exposure to serum PFOS and PFOA levels among 154 older adults in New York State. METHODS: Serum PFOS and PFOA levels were compared to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Potential occupational exposure to any PFAS was determined from work histories, reviewed by an industrial hygienist, and assessed in relation to current serum PFOS and PFOA levels using exposure probability, duration and cumulative exposure. RESULTS: We observed 25% higher serum PFOS and 80% higher PFOA levels in study participants compared to NHANES. No participants reported PFAS chemical manufacturing work, but n = 68 reported work in occupations and industries known to use PFASs. We found that participants with high cumulative workplace exposure had 34% higher serum PFOS levels compared to participants without occupational exposure, adjusted for age, sex and income. Serum PFOS levels were 26% higher for participants with longer occupational exposure durations. The probability of occupational PFAS exposure metric was not associated with serum PFOS. Serum PFOA was not associated with any measure of occupational exposure. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure may contribute to total PFOS body burden in this study population, even among workers not directly involved in manufacturing PFASs. PFAS exposure assessments should evaluate the workplace as a potential source, even when workplace exposures are assumed to be low or moderate.
PURPOSE:Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs) are environmentally persistent amphiphilic compounds. Exposure to two PFASs, perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (PFOS) and perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) is linked to specific occupations and industries. This study examines the contribution of past occupational PFAS exposure to serum PFOS and PFOA levels among 154 older adults in New York State. METHODS: Serum PFOS and PFOA levels were compared to data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Potential occupational exposure to any PFAS was determined from work histories, reviewed by an industrial hygienist, and assessed in relation to current serum PFOS and PFOA levels using exposure probability, duration and cumulative exposure. RESULTS: We observed 25% higher serum PFOS and 80% higher PFOA levels in study participants compared to NHANES. No participants reported PFAS chemical manufacturing work, but n = 68 reported work in occupations and industries known to use PFASs. We found that participants with high cumulative workplace exposure had 34% higher serum PFOS levels compared to participants without occupational exposure, adjusted for age, sex and income. Serum PFOS levels were 26% higher for participants with longer occupational exposure durations. The probability of occupational PFAS exposure metric was not associated with serum PFOS. Serum PFOA was not associated with any measure of occupational exposure. CONCLUSION: Occupational exposure may contribute to total PFOS body burden in this study population, even among workers not directly involved in manufacturing PFASs. PFAS exposure assessments should evaluate the workplace as a potential source, even when workplace exposures are assumed to be low or moderate.
Authors: Geary W Olsen; Cleston C Lange; Mark E Ellefson; David C Mair; Timothy R Church; Corinne L Goldberg; Ross M Herron; Zahra Medhdizadehkashi; John B Nobiletti; Jorge A Rios; William K Reagen; Larry R Zobel Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2012-05-11 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: Lin Tao; Kurunthachalam Kannan; Kenneth M Aldous; Matthew P Mauer; George A Eadon Journal: Environ Sci Technol Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 9.028
Authors: A Yamada; N Bemrah; B Veyrand; C Pollono; M Merlo; V Desvignes; V Sirot; P Marchand; A Berrebi; R Cariou; J P Antignac; B Le Bizec; J C Leblanc Journal: Sci Total Environ Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 7.963
Authors: Valentina Gallo; Giovanni Leonardi; Bernd Genser; Maria-Jose Lopez-Espinosa; Stephanie J Frisbee; Lee Karlsson; Alan M Ducatman; Tony Fletcher Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2012-01-30 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Dina Dobraca; Leslie Israel; Sandra McNeel; Robert Voss; Miaomiao Wang; Ryszard Gajek; June-Soo Park; Suhash Harwani; Frank Barley; Jianwen She; Rupali Das Journal: J Occup Environ Med Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.162
Authors: David Melzer; Neil Rice; Michael H Depledge; William E Henley; Tamara S Galloway Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2010-01-07 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Jürgen Hölzer; Oliver Midasch; Knut Rauchfuss; Martin Kraft; Rolf Reupert; Jürgen Angerer; Peter Kleeschulte; Nina Marschall; Michael Wilhelm Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2008-05 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Matthew C Hamilton; Melissa M Heintz; Marisa Pfohl; Emily Marques; Lucie Ford; Angela L Slitt; William S Baldwin Journal: Food Chem Toxicol Date: 2021-04-08 Impact factor: 5.572
Authors: Leah Calvert; Mark P Green; Geoffry N De Iuliis; Matthew D Dun; Brett D Turner; Bradley O Clarke; Andrew L Eamens; Shaun D Roman; Brett Nixon Journal: Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 5.555