Literature DB >> 29026937

[Minimally invasive and robotic-assisted surgical management of upper gastrointestinal cancer].

P P Grimminger1, H F Fuchs2.   

Abstract

Total minimally invasive upper gastrointestinal resections are currently mainly performed in centers. The advantages include reduction of operative trauma, magnified enlargement of the operation field and the resulting improvement in operative precision. Robotic-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy (RAMIE) and laparoscopic/thoracoscopic minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) are currently the most commonly performed strategies for esophageal cancer. Laparoscopic (MIG) and robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) are the equivalent procedures for gastric cancer. Due to the relatively low number of reported cases, no definitive statement regarding superiority of these procedures compared to standard open or hybrid procedures can be made; however, there is mounting evidence from high-volume centers in which these procedures are routinely performed that there might be an advantage regarding perioperative morbidity. All of the four procedures described are provided at our high-volume centers in a standardized manner and we are convinced of the benefits of these minimally invasive techniques with respect to morbidity compared to open and hybrid techniques. The additional costs of this technology have to be off-set against a possible reduction of morbidity, reduced cost for personnel and new operative options, such as real-time fluoroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Esophagectomy; Gastrectomy; Hybrid technique; Open surgical technique; Robotics

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026937     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-017-0522-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  30 in total

1.  Robot-assisted gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: lessons learned from an initial 100 consecutive procedures.

Authors:  Jyewon Song; Sung Jin Oh; Wook Ho Kang; Woo Jin Hyung; Seung Ho Choi; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Song Shen; Hong-Qing Xi; Lin Chen; Bo Wei
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The impact of pyloric drainage on clinical outcome following esophagectomy: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Arya; S R Markar; A Karthikesalingam; G B Hanna
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2014-02-24       Impact factor: 3.429

4.  Robotic-Assisted Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy (RAMIE) with a Standardized Intrathoracic Circular End-to-side Stapled Anastomosis and a Team of Two (Surgeon and Assistant Only).

Authors:  Peter P Grimminger; Edin Hadzijusufovic; Hauke Lang
Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 1.827

5.  Minimally Invasive Versus Open Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: A Population-Based Analysis.

Authors:  Babatunde A Yerokun; Zhifei Sun; Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang; Brian C Gulack; Paul J Speicher; Mohamed A Adam; Thomas A D'Amico; Mark W Onaitis; David H Harpole; Mark F Berry; Matthew G Hartwig
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Surya S A Y Biere; Mark I van Berge Henegouwen; Kirsten W Maas; Luigi Bonavina; Camiel Rosman; Josep Roig Garcia; Suzanne S Gisbertz; Jean H G Klinkenbijl; Markus W Hollmann; Elly S M de Lange; H Jaap Bonjer; Donald L van der Peet; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

7.  Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital.

Authors:  Pier Cristoforo Giulianotti; Andrea Coratti; Marta Angelini; Fabio Sbrana; Simone Cecconi; Tommaso Balestracci; Giuseppe Caravaglios
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2003-07

8.  Intraoperative Endoscopic Botox Injection During Total Esophagectomy Prevents the Need for Pyloromyotomy or Dilatation.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Ryan C Broderick; Cristina R Harnsberger; Francisco Alvarez Divo; Alisa M Coker; Garth R Jacobsen; Bryan J Sandler; Michael Bouvet; Santiago Horgan
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 1.878

9.  Robotic versus Laparoscopic versus Open Gastrectomy: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Alessandra Marano; Yoon Young Choi; Woo Jin Hyung; Yoo Min Kim; Jieun Kim; Sung Hoon Noh
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.720

10.  Robot-assisted thoracolaparoscopic esophagolymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  J Boone; I H M Borel Rinkes; R van Hillegersberg
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-10-10       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  2 in total

1.  Robot-Assisted Oesophagectomy: Recommendations Towards a Standardised Ivor Lewis Procedure.

Authors:  Jan-Hendrik Egberts; M Biebl; D R Perez; S T Mees; P P Grimminger; B P Müller-Stich; H Stein; H Fuchs; C J Bruns; T Hackert; H Lang; J Pratschke; J Izbicki; J Weitz; T Becker
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Modular step-up approach to robot-assisted transthoracic esophagectomy-experience of a German high volume center.

Authors:  Hans F Fuchs; Dolores T Müller; Jessica M Leers; Wolfgang Schröder; Christiane J Bruns
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2019-08-23
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.