BACKGROUND: Novel regional techniques, including the adductor canal block (ACB) and the local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, provide an alternative approach for controlling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared 3 regional techniques (femoral nerve catheter [FNC] block alone, FNC block with IPACK, and ACB with IPACK) on pain scores, opioid consumption, performance during physical therapy, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: All patients had a continuous perineural infusion, either FNC block or ACB. Patients in the IPACK block groups also received a single injection 30-mL IPACK block of 0.25% ropivacaine. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8-hour intervals for 48 hours. Physical therapy performance was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2, and hospital length of stay was recorded. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the 3 groups with regard to baseline patient demographics. Although we observed no differences in pain scores between the 3 groups, opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the FNC with IPACK group. Physical therapy performance was significantly better on POD 1 in the ACB with IPACK group compared to the other 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ACB with IPACK group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an IPACK block reduced opioid consumption by providing effective supplemental analgesia following TKA compared to the FNC-only technique. ACB with IPACK provided equivalent analgesia and improved physical therapy performance, allowing earlier hospital discharge.
BACKGROUND: Novel regional techniques, including the adductor canal block (ACB) and the local anesthetic infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, provide an alternative approach for controlling pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). This study compared 3 regional techniques (femoral nerve catheter [FNC] block alone, FNC block with IPACK, and ACB with IPACK) on pain scores, opioid consumption, performance during physical therapy, and hospital length of stay in patients undergoing TKA. METHODS: All patients had a continuous perineural infusion, either FNC block or ACB. Patients in the IPACK block groups also received a single injection 30-mL IPACK block of 0.25% ropivacaine. Pain scores and opioid consumption were recorded at postanesthesia care unit discharge and again at 8-hour intervals for 48 hours. Physical therapy performance was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1 and 2, and hospital length of stay was recorded. RESULTS: We found no significant differences in the 3 groups with regard to baseline patient demographics. Although we observed no differences in pain scores between the 3 groups, opioid consumption was significantly reduced in the FNC with IPACK group. Physical therapy performance was significantly better on POD 1 in the ACB with IPACK group compared to the other 2 groups. Hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ACB with IPACK group. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that an IPACK block reduced opioid consumption by providing effective supplemental analgesia following TKA compared to the FNC-only technique. ACB with IPACK provided equivalent analgesia and improved physical therapy performance, allowing earlier hospital discharge.
Authors: Jacques T YaDeau; Janet B Cahill; Mark W Zawadsky; Nigel E Sharrock; Friedrich Bottner; Christine M Morelli; Richard L Kahn; Thomas P Sculco Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: David B Auyong; Cindy Jo Allen; Joshuel A Pahang; Jonathan J Clabeaux; Kevin M MacDonald; Neil A Hanson Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Sanjay K Sinha; Jonathan H Abrams; Sivasenthil Arumugam; John D'Alessio; David G Freitas; John T Barnett; Robert S Weller Journal: Anesth Analg Date: 2012-04-27 Impact factor: 5.108
Authors: M T Jenstrup; P Jæger; J Lund; J S Fomsgaard; S Bache; O Mathiesen; T K Larsen; J B Dahl Journal: Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Date: 2012-01-04 Impact factor: 2.105
Authors: Mohanasundaram Kandasami; Andrew Wg Kinninmonth; Martin Sarungi; Joseph Baines; Nicholas B Scott Journal: Knee Date: 2008-11-28 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Robert B Bourne; Bert M Chesworth; Aileen M Davis; Nizar N Mahomed; Kory D J Charron Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Muhammad Farooq Rai; Hua Pan; Huimin Yan; Linda J Sandell; Christine T N Pham; Samuel A Wickline Journal: Transl Res Date: 2019-07-10 Impact factor: 7.012
Authors: Brandon Kandarian; Pier F Indelli; Sanjay Sinha; Oluwatobi O Hunter; Rachel R Wang; T Edward Kim; Alex Kou; Edward R Mariano Journal: Korean J Anesthesiol Date: 2019-02-19
Authors: Naghmeh Pirsaharkhiz; Kelly Comolli; Wakana Fujiwara; Susan Stasiewicz; Jeanne M Boyer; Eileen V Begin; Adam J Rubinstein; Hayley R Henderson; John F Lazar; Thomas J Watson; Christopher M Eger; Christine T Trankiem; Debra G Phillips; Puja Gaur Khaitan Journal: J Cardiothorac Surg Date: 2020-05-12 Impact factor: 1.637