Literature DB >> 29026100

A new semi-supervised learning model combined with Cox and SP-AFT models in cancer survival analysis.

Hua Chai1, Zi-Na Li2, De-Yu Meng2, Liang-Yong Xia1, Yong Liang3.   

Abstract

Gene selection is an attractive and important task in cancer survival analysis. Most existing supervised learning methods can only use the labeled biological data, while the censored data (weakly labeled data) far more than the labeled data are ignored in model building. Trying to utilize such information in the censored data, a semi-supervised learning framework (Cox-AFT model) combined with Cox proportional hazard (Cox) and accelerated failure time (AFT) model was used in cancer research, which has better performance than the single Cox or AFT model. This method, however, is easily affected by noise. To alleviate this problem, in this paper we combine the Cox-AFT model with self-paced learning (SPL) method to more effectively employ the information in the censored data in a self-learning way. SPL is a kind of reliable and stable learning mechanism, which is recently proposed for simulating the human learning process to help the AFT model automatically identify and include samples of high confidence into training, minimizing interference from high noise. Utilizing the SPL method produces two direct advantages: (1) The utilization of censored data is further promoted; (2) the noise delivered to the model is greatly decreased. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model compared to the traditional Cox-AFT model.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29026100      PMCID: PMC5638936          DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13133-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  29 in total

1.  Losses of chromosome 5q and 14q are associated with favorable clinical outcome of patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Tineke E Buffart; Beatriz Carvalho; Nicole C T van Grieken; Wessel N van Wieringen; Marianne Tijssen; Elma Meershoek-Klein Kranenbarg; Henk M W Verheul; Heike I Grabsch; Bauke Ylstra; Cornelis J H van de Velde; Gerrit A Meijer
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

2.  L1 penalized estimation in the Cox proportional hazards model.

Authors:  Jelle J Goeman
Journal:  Biom J       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.207

Review 3.  Dynamic modeling and analysis of cancer cellular network motifs.

Authors:  Mathieu Cloutier; Edwin Wang
Journal:  Integr Biol (Camb)       Date:  2011-06-15       Impact factor: 2.192

4.  Genomic organization and chromosomal localization of the human CUL2 gene and the role of von Hippel-Lindau tumor suppressor-binding protein (CUL2 and VBP1) mutation and loss in renal-cell carcinoma development.

Authors:  S C Clifford; S Walsh; K Hewson; E K Green; A Brinke; P M Green; F Gianelli; C Eng; E R Maher
Journal:  Genes Chromosomes Cancer       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Signaling network analysis of ubiquitin-mediated proteins suggests correlations between the 26S proteasome and tumor progression.

Authors:  Cong Fu; Jie Li; Edwin Wang
Journal:  Mol Biosyst       Date:  2009-12

Review 6.  Predictive genomics: a cancer hallmark network framework for predicting tumor clinical phenotypes using genome sequencing data.

Authors:  Edwin Wang; Naif Zaman; Shauna Mcgee; Jean-Sébastien Milanese; Ali Masoudi-Nejad; Maureen O'Connor-McCourt
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2014-04-18       Impact factor: 15.707

7.  Gene expression profiling identifies clinically relevant subtypes of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jacques Lapointe; Chunde Li; John P Higgins; Matt van de Rijn; Eric Bair; Kelli Montgomery; Michelle Ferrari; Lars Egevad; Walter Rayford; Ulf Bergerheim; Peter Ekman; Angelo M DeMarzo; Robert Tibshirani; David Botstein; Patrick O Brown; James D Brooks; Jonathan R Pollack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-07       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Mutational analysis of hypoxia-related genes HIF1alpha and CUL2 in common human cancers.

Authors:  Sang Wook Park; Nak Gyun Chung; Soo Young Hur; Ho Shik Kim; Nam Jin Yoo; Sug Hyung Lee
Journal:  APMIS       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.205

9.  Cancer survival analysis using semi-supervised learning method based on Cox and AFT models with L1/2 regularization.

Authors:  Yong Liang; Hua Chai; Xiao-Ying Liu; Zong-Ben Xu; Hai Zhang; Kwong-Sak Leung
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Clinicopathological features of alpha-fetoprotein producing early gastric cancer with enteroblastic differentiation.

Authors:  Kohei Matsumoto; Hiroya Ueyama; Kenshi Matsumoto; Yoichi Akazawa; Hiroyuki Komori; Tsutomu Takeda; Takashi Murakami; Daisuke Asaoka; Mariko Hojo; Natsumi Tomita; Akihito Nagahara; Yoshiaki Kajiyama; Takashi Yao; Sumio Watanabe
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

View more
  2 in total

1.  Multi-view based integrative analysis of gene expression data for identifying biomarkers.

Authors:  Zi-Yi Yang; Xiao-Ying Liu; Jun Shu; Hui Zhang; Yan-Qiong Ren; Zong-Ben Xu; Yong Liang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 2.  Semi-supervised learning in cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Jan-Niklas Eckardt; Martin Bornhäuser; Karsten Wendt; Jan Moritz Middeke
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-07-14       Impact factor: 5.738

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.