Literature DB >> 24747696

Predictive genomics: a cancer hallmark network framework for predicting tumor clinical phenotypes using genome sequencing data.

Edwin Wang1, Naif Zaman2, Shauna Mcgee3, Jean-Sébastien Milanese4, Ali Masoudi-Nejad5, Maureen O'Connor-McCourt6.   

Abstract

Tumor genome sequencing leads to documenting thousands of DNA mutations and other genomic alterations. At present, these data cannot be analyzed adequately to aid in the understanding of tumorigenesis and its evolution. Moreover, we have little insight into how to use these data to predict clinical phenotypes and tumor progression to better design patient treatment. To meet these challenges, we discuss a cancer hallmark network framework for modeling genome sequencing data to predict cancer clonal evolution and associated clinical phenotypes. The framework includes: (1) cancer hallmarks that can be represented by a few molecular/signaling networks. 'Network operational signatures' which represent gene regulatory logics/strengths enable to quantify state transitions and measures of hallmark traits. Thus, sets of genomic alterations which are associated with network operational signatures could be linked to the state/measure of hallmark traits. The network operational signature transforms genotypic data (i.e., genomic alterations) to regulatory phenotypic profiles (i.e., regulatory logics/strengths), to cellular phenotypic profiles (i.e., hallmark traits) which lead to clinical phenotypic profiles (i.e., a collection of hallmark traits). Furthermore, the framework considers regulatory logics of the hallmark networks under tumor evolutionary dynamics and therefore also includes: (2) a self-promoting positive feedback loop that is dominated by a genomic instability network and a cell survival/proliferation network is the main driver of tumor clonal evolution. Surrounding tumor stroma and its host immune systems shape the evolutionary paths; (3) cell motility initiating metastasis is a byproduct of the above self-promoting loop activity during tumorigenesis; (4) an emerging hallmark network which triggers genome duplication dominates a feed-forward loop which in turn could act as a rate-limiting step for tumor formation; (5) mutations and other genomic alterations have specific patterns and tissue-specificity, which are driven by aging and other cancer-inducing agents. This framework represents the logics of complex cancer biology as a myriad of phenotypic complexities governed by a limited set of underlying organizing principles. It therefore adds to our understanding of tumor evolution and tumorigenesis, and moreover, potential usefulness of predicting tumors' evolutionary paths and clinical phenotypes. Strategies of using this framework in conjunction with genome sequencing data in an attempt to predict personalized drug targets, drug resistance, and metastasis for cancer patients, as well as cancer risks for healthy individuals are discussed. Accurate prediction of cancer clonal evolution and clinical phenotypes will have substantial impact on timely diagnosis, personalized treatment and personalized prevention of cancer. Crown
Copyright © 2014. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer hallmark; Cancer hallmark network framework; Cancer systems biology; Clinical phenotype; Drug resistance; Gene regulatory profile; Network; Network operational signature; Personalized medicine; Regulatory Phenotype; Tumor genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24747696     DOI: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.04.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol        ISSN: 1044-579X            Impact factor:   15.707


  126 in total

Review 1.  Multifaceted Roles of Long Non-coding RNAs in Head and Neck Cancer.

Authors:  Leslie Duncan; Chloe Shay; Yong Teng
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

2.  RKNNMDA: Ranking-based KNN for MiRNA-Disease Association prediction.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Qiao-Feng Wu; Gui-Ying Yan
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  Molecular Marker Expression Is Highly Heterogeneous in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma and Does Not Predict a Response to Neoadjuvant Therapy.

Authors:  Nathan W Bronson; Brian S Diggs; Gene Bakis; Kenneth M Gatter; Brett C Sheppard; John G Hunter; James P Dolan
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  HNMDA: heterogeneous network-based miRNA-disease association prediction.

Authors:  Li-Hong Peng; Chuan-Neng Sun; Na-Na Guan; Jian-Qiang Li; Xing Chen
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 3.291

5.  ELLPMDA: Ensemble learning and link prediction for miRNA-disease association prediction.

Authors:  Xing Chen; Zhihan Zhou; Yan Zhao
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 4.652

6.  Controlling Directed Protein Interaction Networks in Cancer.

Authors:  Krishna Kanhaiya; Eugen Czeizler; Cristian Gratie; Ion Petre
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  DCMP: database of cancer mutant protein domains.

Authors:  Isaac Arnold Emerson; Kiran Kumar Chitluri
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2021-11-13       Impact factor: 3.451

Review 8.  Single-cell approaches for molecular classification of endocrine tumors.

Authors:  James Koh; Nancy L Allbritton; Julie A Sosa
Journal:  Curr Opin Oncol       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 3.645

9.  Acquisition of Invasiveness by Breast Adenocarcinoma Cells Engages Established Hallmarks and Novel Regulatory Mechanisms.

Authors:  Hanaa Mousa; Mahmoud Elgamal; Reham Ghazal Marei; Nazariy Souchelnytskyi; Kah-Wai Lin; Serhiy Souchelnytskyi
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.069

10.  NExUS: Bayesian simultaneous network estimation across unequal sample sizes.

Authors:  Priyam Das; Christine B Peterson; Kim-Anh Do; Rehan Akbani; Veerabhadran Baladandayuthapani
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.937

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.