| Literature DB >> 29026092 |
Yichao Rui1, Deirdre B Gleeson1, Daniel V Murphy1, Frances C Hoyle2,3.
Abstract
One of the greatest contemporary challenges in terrestrial ecology is to determine the impact of climate change on the world's ecosystems. Here we investigated how wetting patterns (frequency and intensity) and nutrient additions altered microbial biomass and CO2-C loss from a semi-arid soil. South-western Australia is predicted to experience declining annual rainfall but increased frequency of summer rainfall events when soil is fallow. Agricultural soils (0-10 cm at 10 °C or 25 °C) received the same total amount ofEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29026092 PMCID: PMC5638940 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-13094-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Theoretical soil water-filled pore space (WFPS) following wetting applications (WE) over the 30-day incubation period. Lines represent indicative soil water content on application of wetting treatments based on changes occurring within a day of application. Once treatments meet the upper water-filled pore space continuum (solid line) reflective of a single wetting event (1 WE) they remain steady to the end of incubation.
Figure 2CO2-C evolution rate in soils received different wetting applications (WE) including one wetting on day 0 (A and B), 3 wettings on day 0, 1, or 2 (C and D), 3 wettings on day 0, 10, or 20 (E and F), 10 wettings on day 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, and 27 (G and H), and nutrients applications incubated at 10 °C and 25 °C during the 30-day incubation period. Bars represent standard errors.
Properties including total carbon (C), total nitrogen (N), C:N ratio, and inorganic phosphorus (P), potassium (K), and sulphur (S) concentration of soils received different wetting applications and nutrients applications after 30 days of incubation at 10 °C and 25 °C (standard errors are shown in parentheses, n = 4; *indicates a significant difference at P < 0.05).
| Temperature | Nutrients | Wetting # applications | Cumulative CO2-C evolution (mg CO2-C kg−1 soil) | Total C (%) | Total N (%) | C:N Ratio | Inorganic P (mg kg−1) | Inorganic K (mg kg−1) | Inorganic S (mg kg−1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10 °C | Nil | 1 (day 0) | 143 (1) | 0.86 (0.02) | 0.07 (0.001) | 12.2 (0.1) | 24 (1) | 103 (4) | 6.2 (0.2) |
| 3 (day 0, 1, and 2) | 122 (2) | 0.85 (0.02) | 0.07 (0.003) | 11.7 (0.4) | 29 (1) | 119 (3) | 6.7 (0.2) | ||
| 3 (day 0, 10, and 20) | 97 (1) | 0.86 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.006) | 11.1 (0.7) | 29 (1) | 130 (6) | 6.5 (0.3) | ||
| 10 (every 3 days) | 86 (1)* | 0.88 (0.01) | 0.08 (0.003) | 11.1 (0.3) | 31 (1)* | 122 (4) | 6.7 (0.3) | ||
| Plus (N + P) | 1 (day 0) | 142 (2) | 0.86 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.003) | 11.1 (0.4) | 32 (3) | 114 (6) | 6.5 (0.4) | |
| 3 (day 0, 1, and 2) | 128 (2) | 0.88 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.005) | 10.2 (0.4) | 36 (0) | 131 (7) | 7.3 (0.3) | ||
| 3 (day 0, 10, and 20) | 104 (1) | 0.90 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.003) | 10.9 (0.3) | 36 (4) | 131 (5) | 7.4 (0.6) | ||
| 10 (every 3 days) | 100 (1)* | 0.95 (0.02)* | 0.09 (0.003)* | 10.8 (0.3) | 37 (1)* | 130 (4) | 6.6 (0.1) | ||
| 25 °C | Nil | 1 (day 0) | 382 (8) | 0.82 (0.01) | 0.08 (0.002) | 10.4 (0.2) | 34 (1) | 126 (3) | 9.1 (0.4) |
| 3 (day 0, 1, and 2) | 355 (8) | 0.87 (0.04) | 0.08 (0.003) | 11.2 (0.4) | 33 (2) | 121 (5) | 8.7 (0.1) | ||
| 3 (day 0, 10, and 20) | 303 (2) | 0.89 (0.02) | 0.08 (0.001) | 10.8 (0.3) | 33 (2) | 122 (7) | 8.4 (0.6) | ||
| 10 (every 3 days) | 260 (4)* | 0.90 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.004) | 11.1 (0.2) | 34 (1) | 124 (4) | 8.3 (0.3) | ||
| Plus (N + P) | 1 (day 0) | 356 (4) | 0.86 (0.02) | 0.08 (0.004) | 10.5 (0.5) | 32 (2) | 112 (3) | 7.3 (0.4) | |
| 3 (day 0, 1, and 2) | 349 (4) | 0.85 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.003) | 10.5 (0.2) | 42 (2) | 135 (2) | 8.4 (0.4) | ||
| 3 (day 0, 10, and 20) | 286 (2) | 0.89 (0.03) | 0.08 (0.003) | 10.6 (0.2) | 38 (1) | 130 (4) | 9.2 (0.3) | ||
| 10 (every 3 days) | 245 (4)* | 0.91 (0.03) | 0.09 (0.003) | 10.6 (0.1) | 35 (2)* | 117 (8)* | 8.9 (0.4) |
Figure 3Microbial biomass C (MBC; (A and B) and metabolic quotient (qCO , (C and D) of soils received different wetting applications (WE) and nutrients applications after 30 days of incubation at 10 °C and 25 °C. Bars represent standard errors. Different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05) between wetting applications of this temperature × nutrient treatment.
Figure 4Abundance of total bacteria (A and B), fungi (C and D), and archaea (E and F) of soils that received different wetting applications (WE) and nutrients applications after 30 days of incubation at 10 °C and 25 °C. Bars represent standard errors. Different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05) between wetting applications of this temperature × nutrient treatment.
Figure 5Abundance of functional genes cbhI (A and B), GH48 (C and D) and LMCO (E and F) of soils received different wetting applications (WE) and nutrients applications after 30 days of incubation at 10 °C and 25 °C. Bars represent standard errors. Different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05) between wetting applications of this temperature × nutrient treatment.
Figure 6Nitrate-N concentration (A and B) and potentially mineralisable N (C and D) of soils received different wetting applications (WE) and nutrients applications after 30 days of incubation at 10 °C and 25 °C. Bars represent standard errors. Different letters mean significant difference (P < 0.05) between wetting applications of this temperature × nutrient treatment.