Literature DB >> 29025721

Predictive Models in Differentiating Vertebral Lesions Using Multiparametric MRI.

R Rathore1, A Parihar2, D K Dwivedi1, A K Dwivedi3, N Kohli1, R K Garg4, A Chandra5.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Conventional MR imaging has high sensitivity but limited specificity in differentiating various vertebral lesions. We aimed to assess the ability of multiparametric MR imaging in differentiating spinal vertebral lesions and to develop statistical models for predicting the probability of malignant vertebral lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred twenty-six consecutive patients underwent multiparametric MRI (conventional MR imaging, diffusion-weighted MR imaging, and in-phase/opposed-phase imaging) for vertebral lesions. Vertebral lesions were divided into 3 subgroups: infectious, noninfectious benign, and malignant. The cutoffs for apparent diffusion coefficient (expressed as 10-3 mm2/s) and signal intensity ratio values were calculated, and 3 predictive models were established for differentiating these subgroups.
RESULTS: Of the lesions of the 126 patients, 62 were infectious, 22 were noninfectious benign, and 42 were malignant. The mean ADC was 1.23 ± 0.16 for infectious, 1.41 ± 0.31 for noninfectious benign, and 1.01 ± 0.22 mm2/s for malignant lesions. The mean signal intensity ratio was 0.80 ± 0.13 for infectious, 0.75 ± 0.19 for noninfectious benign, and 0.98 ± 0.11 for the malignant group. The combination of ADC and signal intensity ratio showed strong discriminatory ability to differentiate lesion type. We found an area under the curve of 0.92 for the predictive model in differentiating infectious from malignant lesions and an area under the curve of 0.91 for the predictive model in differentiating noninfectious benign from malignant lesions. On the basis of the mean ADC and signal intensity ratio, we established automated statistical models that would be helpful in differentiating vertebral lesions.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that multiparametric MRI differentiates various vertebral lesions, and we established prediction models for the same.
© 2017 by American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29025721      PMCID: PMC7963730          DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5411

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol        ISSN: 0195-6108            Impact factor:   3.825


  33 in total

1.  Adrenal masses: quantification of fat content with double-echo chemical shift in-phase and opposed-phase FLASH MR images for differentiation of adrenal adenomas.

Authors:  T Namimoto; Y Yamashita; K Mitsuzaki; Y Nakayama; O Makita; M Kadota; M Takahashi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compression fractures: fluid sign at MR imaging.

Authors:  Andrea Baur; Axel Stäbler; Susanne Arbogast; Hans Roland Duerr; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Reiser
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Hematologic bone marrow disorders: quantitative chemical shift MR imaging.

Authors:  B R Rosen; D M Fleming; D C Kushner; K S Zaner; R B Buxton; W P Bennet; G L Wismer; T J Brady
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations.

Authors:  Anwar R Padhani; Guoying Liu; Dow Mu Koh; Thomas L Chenevert; Harriet C Thoeny; Taro Takahara; Andrew Dzik-Jurasz; Brian D Ross; Marc Van Cauteren; David Collins; Dima A Hammoud; Gordon J S Rustin; Bachir Taouli; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.715

5.  Chemical shift MR imaging of hyperattenuating (>10 HU) adrenal masses: does it still have a role?

Authors:  Masoom A Haider; Sangeet Ghai; Kartik Jhaveri; Gina Lockwood
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2004-04-29       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient measurement obtained by 3.0Tesla MRI as a potential noninvasive marker of tumor aggressiveness in breast cancer.

Authors:  Manuela Durando; Lucas Gennaro; Gene Y Cho; Dilip D Giri; Merlin M Gnanasigamani; Sujata Patil; Elizabeth J Sutton; Joseph O Deasy; Elizabeth A Morris; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 3.528

7.  Water fraction of lumbar vertebral bone marrow estimated from chemical shift misregistration on MR imaging: normal variations with age and sex.

Authors:  H Ishijima; H Ishizaka; H Horikoshi; M Sakurai
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Comparison between in-phase and opposed-phase T1-weighted breath-hold FLASH sequences for hepatic imaging.

Authors:  N M Rofsky; J C Weinreb; M M Ambrosino; J Safir; G Krinsky
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1996 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  Vertebral compression fractures: distinction between benign and malignant causes with MR imaging.

Authors:  W T Yuh; C K Zachar; T J Barloon; Y Sato; W J Sickels; D R Hawes
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Role of magnetic resonance diffusion imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient values in the evaluation of spinal tuberculosis in Indian patients.

Authors:  Lalitha Palle; McH Balaji Reddy; K Jagannath Reddy
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2010-11
View more
  3 in total

1.  Aggressive vertebral hemangioma masquerading as neurological disease in a pediatric patient.

Authors:  Divya Sahajwalla; Gregory Vorona; Gary Tye; Amy Harper; Hope Richard; India Sisler; Michele Ellett; Brian Cameron; Dennis Rivet; Jacqueline Urbine
Journal:  Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2021-03-01

2.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in the Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Lesions : Combination of Diffusion-Weighted and Proton Density Fat Fraction Spine MRI.

Authors:  Frederic Carsten Schmeel; Simon Jonas Enkirch; Julian Alexander Luetkens; Anton Faron; Nils Lehnen; Alois Martin Sprinkart; Leonard Christopher Schmeel; Alexander Radbruch; Ulrike Attenberger; Guido Matthias Kukuk; Petra Mürtz
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2021-03-31       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  FDG-PET vs. chemical shift MR imaging in differentiating intertrabecular metastasis from hematopoietic bone marrow hyperplasia.

Authors:  Nozomi Oki; Yohei Ikebe; Hirofumi Koike; Reiko Ideguchi; Daisuke Niino; Masataka Uetani
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2021-06-08       Impact factor: 2.374

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.