Literature DB >> 29025001

Using patient-reported outcome measurement to improve patient care.

John Øvretveit1, Lisa Zubkoff2,3,4, Eugene C Nelson4,5,6, Susan Frampton7, Janne Lehmann Knudsen8, Eyal Zimlichman9.   

Abstract

Patients at the center of care is often the stated focus of clinicians and healthcare services. The quality and safety movement has shown that effective organization of care is needed, in addition to professional skills. This movement has provided professionals and others with methods to improve both organization and practice for patients. These methods include measurement to give those carrying out improvement feedback about the effects of their changes. New types of measures that enable patients to report treatment outcomes can now be use in quality improvement and quality reporting to bring a renewed focus on making care more patient-centered. Although used for some time in research, these measures are relatively new tools for quality improvement and not all research measures are suitable for everyday feedback or improvement projects. The purpose of the paper is to provide an introduction to the use and value of patient-reported outcome measures in quality improvement and to give practical guidance and resources for using PROMs for quality improvement. It draws on the authors' experiences using patient reported outcomes measures for quality research and improvement and their workshop at the 2016 Tokyo ISQUA conference, as well as on reviews and guidance documents about the use of PROMs. It does not provide a comprehensive and systematic review of research, but an overview and introduction to PROMs for quality improvement.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the International Society for Quality in Health Care. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  implementation; patient-centered care; patient-reported outcome measures; patient-reported outcomes; quality improvement; quality measurement

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29025001     DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Qual Health Care        ISSN: 1353-4505            Impact factor:   2.038


  26 in total

1.  Understanding limitations in sport 1 year after an Achilles tendon rupture: a multicentre analysis of 285 patients.

Authors:  Eric Hamrin Senorski; Simon Svedman; Eleonor Svantesson; Adam Danielsson; Ferid Krupic; Paul Ackermann; Olof Westin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Perceived benefits and limitations of using patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice with individual patients: a systematic review of qualitative studies.

Authors:  Rachel Campbell; Angela Ju; Madeleine T King; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.147

3.  Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care.

Authors:  Jan R Boehnke; Claudia Rutherford
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 4.  Saving time and effort: Best practice for adapting existing patient-reported outcome measures in hepatology.

Authors:  Laith Alrubaiy; Hayley A Hutchings; Sarah E Hughes; Thomas Dobbs
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2022-05-27

5.  Prognostic value of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in adults with non-small cell Lung Cancer: a scoping review.

Authors:  Kuan Liao; Tianxiao Wang; Jake Coomber-Moore; David C Wong; Fabio Gomes; Corinne Faivre-Finn; Matthew Sperrin; Janelle Yorke; Sabine N van der Veer
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  The use of patient-reported outcome measures to classify type 1 and 2 systemic lupus erythematosus activity.

Authors:  Amanda M Eudy; Bryce B Reeve; Theresa Coles; Li Lin; Jennifer L Rogers; David S Pisetsky; Lisa G Criscione-Schreiber; Jayanth Doss; Rebecca Sadun; Kai Sun; Megan Eb Clowse
Journal:  Lupus       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.858

7.  Patient-reported outcome measures as a new application in the Swedish Renal Registry: health-related quality of life through RAND-36.

Authors:  Agneta A Pagels; Maria Stendahl; Marie Evans
Journal:  Clin Kidney J       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Psychometric properties of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) pediatric item bank peer relationships in the Dutch general population.

Authors:  Michiel A J Luijten; Raphaële R L van Litsenburg; Caroline B Terwee; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Comparing patient-reported outcomes across countries: An assessment of methodological challenges.

Authors:  Jason M Sutherland; Shanika Rajapakshe; Trafford Crump; Andrée Chartrand; Guiping Liu; Ahmer Karimuddin
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2021-02-07

10.  Substituting hospital-based outpatient cardiology care: The impact on quality, health and costs.

Authors:  Tessa C C Quanjel; Marieke D Spreeuwenberg; Jeroen N Struijs; Caroline A Baan; Dirk Ruwaard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.