Literature DB >> 34635961

Using feedback tools to enhance the quality and experience of care.

Jan R Boehnke1, Claudia Rutherford2,3.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2021        PMID： 34635961     DOI： 10.1007/s11136-021-03008-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Qual Life Res        ISSN： 0962-9343            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
  46 in total

1.  Using implementation science to inform the integration of electronic patient-reported experience measures (ePREMs) into healthcare quality improvement: description of a theory-based application in primary care.

Authors:  Kimberly Manalili; Maria J Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Collecting and delivering progress feedback: A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring.

Authors:  Michael J Lambert; Jason L Whipple; Maria Kleinstäuber
Journal:  Psychotherapy (Chic)       Date:  2018-12

3.  Deriving Implementation Strategies for Outcome Monitoring Feedback from Theory, Research and Practice.

Authors:  Kim de Jong
Journal:  Adm Policy Ment Health       Date:  2016-05

Review 4.  Implementing patient-reported outcomes assessment in clinical practice: a review of the options and considerations.

Authors:  Claire F Snyder; Neil K Aaronson; Ali K Choucair; Thomas E Elliott; Joanne Greenhalgh; Michele Y Halyard; Rachel Hess; Deborah M Miller; Bryce B Reeve; Maria Santana
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2011-11-03       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  Exploring the implementation of patient-reported outcome measures in cancer care: need for more real-world evidence results in the peer reviewed literature.

Authors:  Milena Anatchkova; Sarah M Donelson; Anne M Skalicky; Colleen A McHorney; Dayo Jagun; Jennifer Whiteley
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2018-12-27

6.  A retrospective assessment of the KLIK PROM portal implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Authors:  Hedy A van Oers; Lorynn Teela; Sasja A Schepers; Martha A Grootenhuis; Lotte Haverman
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-08-15       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The utility of the implementation science framework "Integrated Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services" (i-PARIHS) and the facilitator role for introducing patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a medical oncology outpatient department.

Authors:  Natasha A Roberts; Monika Janda; Angela M Stover; Kimberly E Alexander; David Wyld; Alison Mudge
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.147

8.  Development of a framework with tools to support the selection and implementation of patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Philip J van der Wees; Eva W Verkerk; Marjolein E A Verbiest; Marloes Zuidgeest; Carla Bakker; Jozé Braspenning; Dolf de Boer; Caroline B Terwee; Ildikó Vajda; Anna Beurskens; Simone A van Dulmen
Journal:  J Patient Rep Outcomes       Date:  2019-12-30

9.  Prospective application of implementation science theories and frameworks to inform use of PROMs in routine clinical care within an integrated pain network.

Authors:  Sara Ahmed; Diana Zidarov; Owis Eilayyan; Regina Visca
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Initial quantitative development of the Norse Feedback system: a novel clinical feedback system for routine mental healthcare.

Authors:  Andrew A McAleavey; Samuel S Nordberg; Christian Moltu
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 4.147
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.