| Literature DB >> 29023410 |
Miklos Szokol1, Daniel Priksz2, Mariann Bombicz3, Balazs Varga4, Arpad Kovacs5, Gabor Aron Fulop6, Tamas Csipo7, Aniko Posa8, Attila Toth9, Zoltan Papp10, Zoltan Szilvassy11, Bela Juhasz12.
Abstract
The present investigation evaluates the cardiovascular effects of the anorexigenic mediator alpha-melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH), in a rat model of type 2 diabetes. Osmotic mini pumps delivering MSH or vehicle, for 6 weeks, were surgically implanted in Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats. Serum parameters, blood pressure, and weight gain were monitored along with oral glucose tolerance (OGTT). Echocardiography was conducted and, following sacrifice, the effects of treatment on ischemia/reperfusion cardiac injury were assessed using the isolated working heart method. Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) oxidase activity was measured to evaluate levels of oxidative stress, and force measurements were performed on isolated cardiomyocytes to determine calcium sensitivity, active tension and myofilament co-operation. Vascular status was also evaluated on isolated arterioles using a contractile force measurement setup. The echocardiographic parameters ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), isovolumetric relaxation time (IVRT), mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE), and Tei-index were significantly better in the MSH-treated group compared to ZDF controls. Isolated working heart aortic and coronary flow was increased in treated rats, and higher Hill coefficient indicated better myofilament co-operation in the MSH-treated group. We conclude that MSH improves global heart functions in ZDF rats, but these effects are not related to the vascular status.Entities:
Keywords: NADPH oxidase; alpha-melanocyte-stimulating hormone; echocardiography; isolated working heart; myocyte force
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29023410 PMCID: PMC6151765 DOI: 10.3390/molecules22101702
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Weight, weight gain, left ventricle (LV) mass and body weight ratio (measured by echocardiography), serum parameters and blood pressure results of untreated control (n = 6) and alpha-MSH-treated (n = 6) Zucker Diabetic Fatty (ZDF) rats. No significant changes were found in weight gain, plasma cholesterol and triglyceride and blood pressure values among groups. Even though decreased LV mass to body weight ratios were measured in the melanocyte stimulating hormone (MSH) group at the endpoint when compared to Control. * vs. Control, p < 0.05, Student’s t-test.
| Parameter | Control | MSH |
|---|---|---|
| Endpoint weight (g) | 358.7 ± 7.154 | 391.8 ± 17.00 |
| Weight gain (%) | 20.23 ± 2.444 | 17.65 ± 2.225 |
| Baseline LV mass/Baseline bodyweight (%) | 0.337 ± 0.011 | 0.321 ± 0.017 |
| Endpoint LV mass/Endpoint bodyweight (%) | 0.320 ± 0.011 | 0.2770 ± 0.010 * |
| Total cholesterol (mmol/L) | 3.445 ± 0.210 | 3.295 ± 0.074 |
| HDL (mmol/L) | 2.082 ± 0.194 | 1.768 ± 0.092 |
| Triglyceride (mmol/L) | 3.487 ± 0.318 | 3.068 ± 0.344 |
| Systolic BP (mmHg) | 134.00 ± 4.073 | 142.2 ± 1.900 |
| Diastolic BP (mmHg) | 96.25 ± 3.484 | 105.5 ± 4.400 |
Figure 1Results of the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) carried out at the start and on the 6th week of the experiment. No significant differences were seen between alpha-MSH-treated and untreated ZDF animal-groups. One-way ANOVA, all data is presented as mean ± SEM. * vs. BASE, p < 0.05.
Echocardiographic parameters of untreated control and alpha-MSH-treated ZDF rats at the baseline and at the endpoint of the study. Ejection fraction (EF), fractional shortening (FS), stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and mitral plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) were elevated in treated group. Isovolumic relaxation time (IVRT) and isovolumic contraction time (IVCT) were lengthened in ZDF animals, but shortened in alpha-MSH-treated group. Myocardial Performance Index (MPI or Tei-index) and left atrium to aortic ratio (LA/Ao) were also improved after the treatment. One-way ANOVA was used to estimate statistical differences. ❖ vs. BASE, p < 0.05; * vs. Control, p < 0.05.
| Parameter | BASE | Control | MSH |
|---|---|---|---|
| LA/Ao ratio | 1.133 ± 0.039 | 1.104 ± 0.043 | 0.945 ± 0.029 * |
| LV Ejection Fraction (%) | 73.17 ± 1.973 | 66.50 ± 0.067 ❖ | 72.00 ± 0.774 * |
| LV Fractional Shortening (%) | 37.50 ± 1.500 | 32.33 ± 0.421 ❖ | 36.83 ± 0.703 * |
| IVSd (mm) | 1.845 ± 0.164 | 1.550 ± 0.044 | 1.613 ± 0.099 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 7.038 ± 0.048 | 7.747 ± 0.328 | 7.688 ± 0.248 |
| IVSs (mm) | 2.603 ± 0.075 | 2.143 ± 0.093 ❖ | 2.097 ± 0.103 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 4.385 ± 0.103 | 5.232 ± 0.226 | 4.858 ± 0.117 |
| Stroke volume (mL) | 0.428 ± 0.037 | 0.406 ± 0.046 | 0.581 ± 0.030 * |
| Cardiac Output (mL/min) | 99.89 ± 8.236 | 77.55 ± 7.763 | 112.30 ± 6.110 * |
| HR (bpm) | 235.8 ± 8.462 | 192.7 ± 4.185 ❖ | 193.3 ± 6.259 ❖ |
| LVOT maxPG (mmHg) | 3.173 ± 0.217 | 2.698 ± 0.254 | 3.765 ± 0.284 * |
| LVOT meanPG (mmHg) | 1.178 ± 0.138 | 1.095 ± 0.088 | 1.592 ± 0.106 * |
| LVOT Vmax (m/s) | 0.887 ± 0.029 | 0.818 ± 0.038 | 0.965 ± 0.036 * |
| LVOT Vmean (m/s) | 0.447 ± 0.032 | 0.441 ± 0.024 | 0.553 ± 0.019 * |
| Lateral e’ (mm/s) | 39.50 ± 1.803 | 26.83 ± 1.939 ❖ | 28.33 ± 0.614 |
| MV E velocity (m/s) | 0.887 ± 0.025 | 0.743 ± 0.014 ❖ | 0.710 ± 0.027 |
| MV A velocity (m/s) | 0.477 ± 0.027 | 0.438 ± 0.022 | 0.403 ± 0.018 |
| MV E/A ratio | 1.885 ± 0.109 | 1.802 ± 0.048 | 1.770 ± 0.101 |
| MV Deceleration Time (ms) | 55.67 ± 3.333 | 66.67 ± 3.201 | 85.50 ± 5.258 * |
| E/e’ ratio | 22.59 ± 0.832 | 28.47 ± 2.220 ❖ | 25.11 ± 1.070 |
| MAPSE (mm) | 2.167 ± 0.061 | 1.602 ± 0.045 ❖ | 2.268 ± 0.010 * |
| Ejection Time (ms) | 100.7 ± 2.459 | 83.17 ± 2.926 ❖ | 93.17 ± 3.877 |
| IVCT (ms) | 18.50 ± 1.708 | 23.50 ± 1.727 | 17.83 ± 0.703 * |
| IVRT (ms) | 25.00 ± 1.390 | 58.00 ± 1.826 ❖ | 43.00 ± 1.125 * |
| MPI (Tei-index) | 0.305 ± 0.012 | 0.491 ± 0.014 ❖ | 0.392 ± 0.013 * |
Figure 2Results of the isolated working heart method. (A) aortic flow values; (B) coronary flow values; (C) heart rate values; (D) cardiac output values; (E) stroke volume values; (F) aortic pressure values; (G) dp/dt values; (H) aortic flow 30 min after reperfusion; (I) stroke volume 30 min after reperfusion; (J) pre-ischemic dp/dt values; (K) dp/dt 60 min after reperfusion; (L) dp/dt 120 min after reperfusion. One-way ANOVA was used (Figure 2A–G), all data is presented as mean ± SEM. * p < 0.05 compared to pre-ischemic Control values. ❖ p < 0.05 compared to pre-ischemic MSH treated values. * p < 0.05 compared to control values at the same time point during isolated working heart experiments (Student’s t-test, Figure 2H–L).
Figure 3Enhanced contractile performance of left ventricular cardiomyocytes following alpha-MSH treatment. (A) Active tension-pCa relationships; (B) Normalized force-pCa relationships; (C) Half-value of Ca2+ sensitivity curves on Panel B indicates myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity (pCa50); (D) Steepness of Ca2+ sensitivity curves on Panel B indicates myofilament co-operation as Hill coefficient (nHill). Data are given as mean ± SEM, whereas n = 12 cardiomyocytes (from 3 to 4 hearts)/groups. P values were calculated by unpaired t-test and shown when p < 0.05.
Figure 4Vascular status of brain arteries—contractile force measurements. (A) KCl evoked responses; (B) Serotonin (5HT) evoked responses; (C) Angiotensin II evoked responses. * p < 0.05, all data are presented as mean ± SD.
Figure 5Effects of α-MSH treatment on NADPH stimulated NADPH oxidase activities of left ventricular tissue homogenates. Data are expressed as mean ± SEM (Student’s t-test). Samples were measured in duplicates, and the average of the averages are shown. CPM, Count Per Minute; NADPH, Nicotine adenine dinucleotide phosphate; α-MSH, α-Melanocyte-stimulating hormone.