Literature DB >> 10792415

The relation between ejection fraction and mitral annulus motion before and after direct-current electrical cardioversion.

K Emilsson1, B Wandt.   

Abstract

Mitral annulus motion (MAM) and the relation between left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) and MAM has been shown to differ between patients with sinus rhythm and patients with atrial fibrillation. However, it has not been investigated how the relation between EF and MAM changes on direct-current (DC) electrical cardioversion to sinus rhythm. Therefore, 31 consecutive patients on the waiting list for DC electrical cardioversion were examined by echocardiography before DC electrical cardioversion, and those who maintained sinus rhythm (13 patients) were examined again 4-8 weeks after cardioversion. The conversion factor (CF) (ratio EF/MAM) decreased from 8.4 +/- 1.7 before to 5.8 +/- 0.8 SD after cardioversion (P<0.001). The EF increased slightly (P<0.05) but the MAM had a much greater increase (P<0.001), resulting in the decrease in CF. There was no significant difference in CF between patients after cardioversion and age- and gender-matched control patients with sinus rhythm, indicating that CF is normalized or almost normalized 4-8 weeks after cardioversion. This indicates that when MAM is used for investigation of the left ventricular function, and the function is expressed as EF, the same CF as in other patients with sinus rhythm can be used 4-8 weeks after DC electrical cardioversion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10792415     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00249.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Physiol        ISSN: 0144-5979


  12 in total

Review 1.  Echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular systolic function: from ejection fraction to torsion.

Authors:  Matteo Cameli; Sergio Mondillo; Marco Solari; Francesca Maria Righini; Valentina Andrei; Carla Contaldi; Eugenia De Marco; Michele Di Mauro; Roberta Esposito; Sabina Gallina; Roberta Montisci; Andrea Rossi; Maurizio Galderisi; Stefano Nistri; Eustachio Agricola; Donato Mele
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 4.214

Review 2.  Echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function: current methodology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Valerio Zacà; Piercarlo Ballo; Maurizio Galderisi; Sergio Mondillo
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 4.214

3.  Mitral annulus motion versus long-axis fractional shortening.

Authors:  Kent Emilsson; Rigmor Egerlid; Britt-Marie Nygren; Birger Wandt
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2006

4.  Can the amplitude of mitral annulus motion be used in the assessment of left ventricular systolic function in patients with left ventricular wall thickness in the upper limit of normal to mild hypertrophy?

Authors:  Kent Emilsson
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2003

5.  Tricuspid annulus motion and mitral annulus motion: Anatomical intimacy causing a good correlation?

Authors:  K Emilsson; R Egerlid; Bm Nygren
Journal:  Exp Clin Cardiol       Date:  2005

Review 6.  Left ventricular ejection fraction as therapeutic target: is it the ideal marker?

Authors:  V Katsi; G Georgiopoulos; A Laina; E Koutli; J Parissis; C Tsioufis; P Nihoyannopoulos; D Tousoulis
Journal:  Heart Fail Rev       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 4.214

7.  Left atrioventricular plane displacement but not left ventricular ejection fraction is influenced by the degree of aortic stenosis.

Authors:  E Rydberg; P Gudmundsson; L Kennedy; L Erhardt; R Willenheimer
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Mitral annular plane systolic excursion (MAPSE) in shock: a valuable echocardiographic parameter in intensive care patients.

Authors:  Lill Bergenzaun; Hans Ohlin; Petri Gudmundsson; Ronnie Willenheimer; Michelle S Chew
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2013-05-30       Impact factor: 2.062

9.  Computer-assisted determination of left ventricular endocardial borders reduces variability in the echocardiographic assessment of ejection fraction.

Authors:  Eva Maret; Lars Brudin; Lena Lindstrom; Eva Nylander; Jan L Ohlsson; Jan E Engvall
Journal:  Cardiovasc Ultrasound       Date:  2008-11-11       Impact factor: 2.062

10.  The relationship between mitral annular systolic velocity and ejection fraction in patients with preserved global systolic function of the left ventricle.

Authors:  Ivaylo Rilkov Daskalov; Ivona Kirilova Daskalova; Lilia Davidkova Demirevska; Borislav Georgiev Atzev
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.298

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.