Literature DB >> 29021123

Red blood cell storage and in-hospital mortality: a secondary analysis of the INFORM randomised controlled trial.

Richard J Cook1, Nancy M Heddle2, Ker-Ai Lee3, Donald M Arnold4, Mark A Crowther5, Philip J Devereaux6, Martin Ellis7, Priscilla Figueroa8, Andrea Kurz9, David Roxby10, Daniel I Sessler9, Yehudit Sharon7, Magdalena Sobieraj-Teague10, Theodore E Warkentin11, Kathryn E Webert12, Rebecca Barty13, Yang Liu13, John W Eikelboom14.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No randomised trials have addressed whether exposure to red blood cells (RBCs) stored longer than 35 days is associated with harm in patients. We aimed to assess the risk of in-hospital mortality associated with transfusing blood stored longer than 35 days.
METHODS: We did a secondary analysis of the INforming Fresh versus Old Red cell Management (INFORM) trial, a pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial of patients (≥18 years) admitted to one of six hospitals in Australia, Canada, Israel, and the USA and expected to need RBC transfusions. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive blood in inventory stored for the longest time (standard care) or the shortest time, using a random allocation schedule and stratified by centre and patient ABO blood group. The primary objective of the INFORM trial was to assess all-cause in-hospital mortality in patients with blood group A and O who were transfused. For our exploratory secondary analysis, we classified individuals into one of three mutually exclusive exposure categories on the basis of the maximum storage duration of any blood unit patients had received on each day in hospital: exclusively exposed to RBCs stored no longer than 7 days, exposed to at least one unit of RBCs stored 8-35 days, and exposed to least one unit of RBCs stored longer than 35 days. Our primary objective was to determine the effect on risk of in-hospital death of time-dependent exposure to RBCs stored longer than 35 days compared with exclusive exposure to RBCs stored no longer than 7 days, both in patients of blood groups A and O and all patients. The INFORM trial is registered as an International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial, number ISRCTN08118744.
FINDINGS: Between April 2, 2012, and Oct 21, 2015, 31 497 patients were recruited, and 24 736 patients were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. We excluded nine patients for whom information about the storage duration of transfused blood was missing and one patient whose sex was unknown. 4480 (18%) patients were exposed to RBCs with longest storage, 1392 (6%) patients were exposed exclusively to RBCs with shortest storage, and 18 854 (76%) patients were exposed to RBCs stored 8-35 days. Median follow-up was 11 days (IQR 6-20). Exposure to RBCs stored longer than 35 days was not associated with increased risk of in-hospital death compared with exclusive exposure to the freshest RBC units after adjusting for demographic variables, diagnosis category, and blood product use history (in patients with blood group A or O: hazard ratio 0·94, 95% CI 0·73-1·20, p=0·60; in all patients: 0·91, 0·72-1·14, p=0·40). The risk of in-hospital death also did not differ between patients exposed to blood stored 8-35 days and patients exposed to blood stored 7 days or less (in patients with blood group A or O: 0·92, 0·74-1·15, p=0·48; in all patients: 0·90, 0·73-1·10, p=0·29).
INTERPRETATION: These data provide evidence that transfusion of blood stored for longer than 35 days has no effect on in-hospital mortality, which suggests that current approaches to blood storage and inventory management are reasonable. FUNDING: Canadian Institutes for Health Research, Canadian Blood Services, and Health Canada.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29021123     DOI: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30169-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Haematol        ISSN: 2352-3026            Impact factor:   18.959


  12 in total

1.  The Effects of Storage Age of Blood in Massively Transfused Burn Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the Randomized Transfusion Requirement in Burn Care Evaluation Study.

Authors:  Robert Cartotto; Sandra L Taylor; James H Holmes; Michael Peck; Amalia Cochran; Booker T King; Daval Bhavsar; Edward E Tredget; David Mozingo; David Greenhalgh; Brad H Pollock; Tina L Palmieri
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 7.598

2.  Electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry as a novel approach to monitor the effectiveness and quality of red blood cell transfusions.

Authors:  Huagang Hou; Jin H Baek; Hao Zhang; Francine Wood; Yamei Gao; Ann B Flood; Harold M Swartz; Paul W Buehler
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-05-16       Impact factor: 3.443

3.  Effect of donor, component, and recipient characteristics on hemoglobin increments following red blood cell transfusion.

Authors:  Nareg H Roubinian; Colleen Plimier; Jennifer P Woo; Catherine Lee; Roberta Bruhn; Vincent X Liu; Gabriel J Escobar; Steven H Kleinman; Darrell J Triulzi; Edward L Murphy; Michael P Busch
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 22.113

4.  Heterogeneity of blood processing and storage additives in different centers impacts stored red blood cell metabolism as much as storage time: lessons from REDS-III-Omics.

Authors:  Angelo D'Alessandro; Rachel Culp-Hill; Julie A Reisz; Mikayla Anderson; Xiaoyun Fu; Travis Nemkov; Sarah Gehrke; Connie Zheng; Tamir Kanias; Yuelong Guo; Grier Page; Mark T Gladwin; Steve Kleinman; Marion Lanteri; Mars Stone; Michael Busch; James C Zimring
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 3.157

5.  Older Blood Is Associated With Increased Mortality and Adverse Events in Massively Transfused Trauma Patients: Secondary Analysis of the PROPPR Trial.

Authors:  Allison R Jones; Rakesh P Patel; Marisa B Marques; John P Donnelly; Russell L Griffin; Jean-Francois Pittet; Jeffrey D Kerby; Shannon W Stephens; Stacia M DeSantis; John R Hess; Henry E Wang
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 5.721

6.  Complement Deposition and IgG Binding on Stored Red Blood Cells Are Independent of Storage Time.

Authors:  Astrid J F Thielen; Elisabeth M Meulenbroek; Inge Baas; Robin Bruggen; Sacha S Zeerleder; Diana Wouters
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2018-03-09       Impact factor: 3.747

7.  Rapid clearance of storage-induced microerythrocytes alters transfusion recovery.

Authors:  Camille Roussel; Alexandre Morel; Michaël Dussiot; Mickaël Marin; Martin Colard; Aurélie Fricot-Monsinjon; Anaïs Martinez; Charlotte Chambrion; Benoît Henry; Madeleine Casimir; Geoffroy Volle; Mallorie Dépond; Safi Dokmak; François Paye; Alain Sauvanet; Caroline Le Van Kim; Yves Colin; Sonia Georgeault; Philippe Roingeard; Steven L Spitalnik; Papa Alioune Ndour; Olivier Hermine; Eldad A Hod; Pierre A Buffet; Pascal Amireault
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 22.113

8.  Transfusion of red blood cells stored for shorter versus longer duration for all conditions.

Authors:  Akshay Shah; Susan J Brunskill; Michael Jr Desborough; Carolyn Doree; Marialena Trivella; Simon J Stanworth
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-12-22

9.  Characterizing red blood cell age exposure in massive transfusion therapy: the scalar age of blood index (SBI).

Authors:  Stacia M DeSantis; Derek W Brown; Allison R Jones; Jose-Miguel Yamal; Jean-Francois Pittet; Rakesh P Patel; Charles E Wade; John B Holcomb; Henry Wang
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 3.337

10.  Resuscitation From Hemorrhagic Shock With Fresh and Stored Blood and Polymerized Hemoglobin.

Authors:  Alexander T Williams; Alfredo Lucas; Cynthia R Muller; Carlos Munoz; Crystal Bolden-Rush; Andre F Palmer; Pedro Cabrales
Journal:  Shock       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 3.533

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.