Literature DB >> 29018629

In Vivo Brain Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy: A Measurement of Biomarker Sensitivity to Post-Processing Algorithms.

Daniel Cocuzzo1, Alexander Lin2, Peter Stanwell3, Carolyn Mountford2,4, Nirmal Keshava5.   

Abstract

Clinical translation of reported biomarkers requires reliable and consistent algorithms to derive biomarkers. However, the literature reports statistically significant differences between 1-D MRS measurements from control groups and subjects with disease states but frequently provides little information on the algorithms and parameters used to process the data. The sensitivity of in vivo brain magnetic resonance spectroscopy biomarkers is investigated with respect to parameter values for two key stages of post-acquisitional processing. Our effort is specifically motivated by the lack of consensus on approaches and parameter values for the two critical operations, water resonance removal, and baseline correction. The different stages of data processing also introduce varying levels of uncertainty and arbitrary selection of parameter values can significantly underutilize the intrinsic differences between two classes of signals. The sensitivity of biomarkers points to the need for a better understanding of how all stages of post-acquisitional processing affect biomarker discovery and ultimately, clinical translation. Our results also highlight the possibility of optimizing biomarker discovery by the careful selection of parameters that best reveal class differences. Using previously reported data and biomarkers, our results demonstrate that small changes in parameter values affect the statistical significance and corresponding effect size of biomarkers. Consequently, it is possible to increase the strength of biomarkers by selecting optimal parameter values in different spectral intervals. Our analyses with a previously reported data set demonstrate an increase in effect sizes for wavelet-based biomarkers of up to 36%, with increases in classification performance of up to 12%.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; biomarkers; neuroimaging; sensitivity; statistical significance

Year:  2014        PMID: 29018629      PMCID: PMC5477797          DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2014.2309333

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med        ISSN: 2168-2372            Impact factor:   3.316


  36 in total

1.  Factors affecting the quantification of short echo in-vivo 1H MR spectra: prior knowledge, peak elimination, and filtering.

Authors:  R Bartha; D J Drost; P C Williamson
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 4.044

Review 2.  Non-invasive methods for studying brain energy metabolism: what they show and what it means.

Authors:  G J Kemp
Journal:  Dev Neurosci       Date:  2000 Sep-Dec       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Quantitative MRS: comparison of time domain and time domain frequency domain methods using a novel test procedure.

Authors:  C Elster; A Link; F Schubert; F Seifert; M Walzel; H Rinneberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.546

4.  Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals.

Authors:  A Naressi; C Couturier; I Castang; R de Beer; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.589

5.  Quantitative magnetic resonance spectroscopy: semi-parametric modeling and determination of uncertainties.

Authors:  Clemens Elster; Florian Schubert; Alfred Link; Monika Walzel; Frank Seifert; Herbert Rinneberg
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 4.668

6.  General Image-Quality Equation: GIQE.

Authors:  J C Leachtenauer; W Malila; J Irvine; L Colburn; N Salvaggio
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1997-11-10       Impact factor: 1.980

7.  Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge

Authors: 
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 8.  Pain following spinal cord injury.

Authors:  P J Siddall; J D Loeser
Journal:  Spinal Cord       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.772

Review 9.  Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy and illness stage in schizophrenia--a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Brugger; John M Davis; Stefan Leucht; James M Stone
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 13.382

10.  Statistical classification strategy for proton magnetic resonance spectra of soft tissue sarcoma: an exploratory study with potential clinical utility.

Authors:  Tedros Bezabeh; Samy El-Sayed; Rakesh Patel; Ray L Somorjai; Vivien Bramwell; Rita Kandel; Ian C P Smith
Journal:  Sarcoma       Date:  2002
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.