PURPOSE: Histological grading is currently one of the best predictors of tumor behavior and outcome in soft tissue sarcoma. However, occasionally there is significant disagreement even among expert pathologists. An alternative method that gives more reliable and non-subjective diagnostic information is needed. The potential use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with an appropriate statistical classification strategy was tested here in differentiating normal mesenchymal tissue from soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: Fifty-four normal and soft tissue sarcoma specimens of various histological types were obtained from 15 patients. One-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectra were acquired at 360 MHz. Spectral data were analyzed by using both the conventional peak area ratios and a specific statistical classification strategy. RESULTS: The statistical classification strategy gave much better results than the conventional analysis. The overall classification accuracy (based on the histopathology of the MRS specimens) in differentiating normal mesenchymal from soft tissue sarcoma was 93%, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88%.The results in the test set were 83, 92 and 76%, respectively. Our optimal region selection algorithm identified six spectral regions with discriminating potential, including those assigned to choline, creatine, glutamine, glutamic acid and lipid. CONCLUSION: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with a statistical classification strategy gave good results in differentiating normal mesenchymal tissue from soft tissue sarcoma specimens ex vivo. Such an approach may also differentiate benign tumors from malignant ones and this will be explored in future studies.
PURPOSE: Histological grading is currently one of the best predictors of tumor behavior and outcome in soft tissue sarcoma. However, occasionally there is significant disagreement even among expert pathologists. An alternative method that gives more reliable and non-subjective diagnostic information is needed. The potential use of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in combination with an appropriate statistical classification strategy was tested here in differentiating normal mesenchymal tissue from soft tissue sarcoma. METHODS: Fifty-four normal and soft tissue sarcoma specimens of various histological types were obtained from 15 patients. One-dimensional proton magnetic resonance spectra were acquired at 360 MHz. Spectral data were analyzed by using both the conventional peak area ratios and a specific statistical classification strategy. RESULTS: The statistical classification strategy gave much better results than the conventional analysis. The overall classification accuracy (based on the histopathology of the MRS specimens) in differentiating normal mesenchymal from soft tissue sarcoma was 93%, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 88%.The results in the test set were 83, 92 and 76%, respectively. Our optimal region selection algorithm identified six spectral regions with discriminating potential, including those assigned to choline, creatine, glutamine, glutamic acid and lipid. CONCLUSION: Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy combined with a statistical classification strategy gave good results in differentiating normal mesenchymal tissue from soft tissue sarcoma specimens ex vivo. Such an approach may also differentiate benign tumors from malignant ones and this will be explored in future studies.
Authors: C E Mountford; R L Somorjai; P Malycha; L Gluch; C Lean; P Russell; B Barraclough; D Gillett; U Himmelreich; B Dolenko; A E Nikulin; I C Smith Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2001-09 Impact factor: 6.939
Authors: C Menard; I C Smith; R L Somorjai; L Leboldus; R Patel; C Littman; S J Robertson; T Bezabeh Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2001-06-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: R Dahiya; B Boyle; B C Goldberg; W H Yoon; B Konety; K Chen; T S Yen; W Blumenfeld; P Narayan Journal: Biochem Cell Biol Date: 1992-07 Impact factor: 3.626
Authors: Tedros Bezabeh; Olva Odlum; Richard Nason; Paul Kerr; Donna Sutherland; Rakesh Patel; Ian C P Smith Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Daniel Cocuzzo; Alexander Lin; Peter Stanwell; Carolyn Mountford; Nirmal Keshava Journal: IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med Date: 2014-03-03 Impact factor: 3.316
Authors: Miguel Esperança-Martins; Iola F Duarte; Mara Rodrigues; Joaquim Soares do Brito; Dolores López-Presa; Luís Costa; Isabel Fernandes; Sérgio Dias Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2022-09-28 Impact factor: 6.208