| Literature DB >> 29018520 |
Rahul K Mukherjee1, Louisa O'Neill1, Mark D O'Neill1,2.
Abstract
Ventricular tachycardia (VT), often degenerating into ventricular fibrillation, is the leading cause of sudden cardiac death. Catheter ablation of VT is associated with relatively low, long-term success rates, while the optimal timing of ablation in patients with ischaemic and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy remains unclear. Contemporary practice in most centres is to consider ablation late in the disease process following the failure of anti-arrhythmic medications and/or following recurrent implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks. Three major randomised, controlled trials have been published investigating the role of prophylactic catheter ablation for VT. In the present review, we assess the evidence from these and other related trials in VT ablation to understand if there is sufficient evidence to advocate prophylactic catheter ablation in patients with VT.Entities:
Keywords: Ventricular tachycardia; catheter ablation; implantable cardioverter-defibrillator; non-inducibility; substrate
Year: 2017 PMID: 29018520 PMCID: PMC5610738 DOI: 10.15420/aer.2017:17:1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev ISSN: 2050-3369