Victoria Alguera-Lara1, Michelle M Dowsey2, Jemimah Ride3, Skye Kinder4, David Castle5. 1. Research Senior Registrar, Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 2. Career Development Fellow, Cepartment of Orthopedics St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 3. Research Fellow, Centre for Health Economics, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 4. Medical Student, Department of Psychiatry, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. 5. Professor, Department of Psychiatry, St Vincent's Hospital; The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the literature on shared decision making (regarding treatments in psychiatry), with a view to informing our understanding of the decision making process and the barriers that exist in clinical practice. METHODS: Narrative review of published English-language articles. RESULTS: After culling, 18 relevant articles were included. Themes identified included models of psychiatric care, benefits for patients, and barriers. There is a paucity of published studies specifically related to antipsychotic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Shared decision making is a central part of the recovery paradigm and is of increasing importance in mental health service delivery. The field needs to better understand the basis on which decisions are reached regarding psychiatric treatments. Discrete choice experiments might be useful to inform the development of tools to assist shared decision making in psychiatry.
OBJECTIVES: We reviewed the literature on shared decision making (regarding treatments in psychiatry), with a view to informing our understanding of the decision making process and the barriers that exist in clinical practice. METHODS: Narrative review of published English-language articles. RESULTS: After culling, 18 relevant articles were included. Themes identified included models of psychiatric care, benefits for patients, and barriers. There is a paucity of published studies specifically related to antipsychotic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Shared decision making is a central part of the recovery paradigm and is of increasing importance in mental health service delivery. The field needs to better understand the basis on which decisions are reached regarding psychiatric treatments. Discrete choice experiments might be useful to inform the development of tools to assist shared decision making in psychiatry.
Authors: Katarina Arandjelovic; Harris A Eyre; Eric Lenze; Ajeet B Singh; Michael Berk; Chad Bousman Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2017-10-29 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Margot Metz; Iman Elfeddali; Marjolein Veerbeek; Edwin de Beurs; Aartjan Beekman; Christina van der Feltz-Cornelis Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Syahrir Zaini; Harvin Anbu Manivanna Bharathy; Ahmad Hatim Sulaiman; Jesjeet Singh Gill; Koh Ong Hui; Hasniza Zaman Huri; Siti Hadijah Shamsudin; Ng Chong Guan Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Lilisbeth Perestelo-Pérez; Amado Rivero-Santana; Vanesa Ramos-García; Yolanda Álvarez-Pérez; Andrea Duarte-Díaz; Alezandra Torres-Castaño; Maria Del Mar Trujillo-Martín; Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño; Ana Isabel González-González; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-12-10 Impact factor: 2.692