Maha R Farhat1,2, Karen R Jacobson3, Molly F Franke4, Devinder Kaur5, Megan Murray4,6, Carole D Mitnick4,7. 1. Department of Biomedical Informatics, Harvard Medical School. 2. Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital. 3. Section of Infectious Diseases, Boston University School of Medicine. 4. Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School. 5. University of Massachusetts Medical School, Massachusetts Supranational Tuberculosis Reference Laboratory. 6. Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health. 7. Department of Global Health Equity, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostics that rapidly and accurately predict fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance promise to improve treatment outcomes for individuals with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB). Mutations in the gyr genes, though, can cause variable levels of in vitro FQ resistance, and some in vitro resistance remains unexplained by gyr mutations alone, but the implications of these discrepancies for treatment outcome are unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 172 subjects with MDR/extensively drug-resistant TB subjects and sequenced the full gyrA and gyrB open reading frames in their respective sputum TB isolates. The gyr mutations were classified into 2 categories: a set of mutations that encode high-level FQ resistance and a second set that encodes intermediate resistance levels. We constructed a Cox proportional model to assess the effect of the gyr mutation type on the time to death or treatment failure and compared this with in vitro FQ resistance, controlling for host and treatment factors. RESULTS: Controlling for other host and treatment factors and compared with patients with isolates without gyr resistance mutations, "high-level" gyr mutations significantly predict poor treatment outcomes with a hazard ratio of 2.6 (1.2-5.6). We observed a hazard of death and treatment failure with "intermediate-level" gyr mutations of 1.3 (0.6-3.1), which did not reach statistical significance. The gyr mutations were not different than culture-based FQ drug susceptibility testing in predicting the hazard of death or treatment failure and may be superior. CONCLUSIONS: FQ molecular-based diagnostic tests may better predict treatment response than traditional drug susceptibility testing and open avenues for personalizing TB therapy.
BACKGROUND: Molecular diagnostics that rapidly and accurately predict fluoroquinolone (FQ) resistance promise to improve treatment outcomes for individuals with multidrug-resistant (MDR) tuberculosis (TB). Mutations in the gyr genes, though, can cause variable levels of in vitro FQ resistance, and some in vitro resistance remains unexplained by gyr mutations alone, but the implications of these discrepancies for treatment outcome are unknown. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 172 subjects with MDR/extensively drug-resistant TB subjects and sequenced the full gyrA and gyrB open reading frames in their respective sputum TB isolates. The gyr mutations were classified into 2 categories: a set of mutations that encode high-level FQ resistance and a second set that encodes intermediate resistance levels. We constructed a Cox proportional model to assess the effect of the gyr mutation type on the time to death or treatment failure and compared this with in vitro FQ resistance, controlling for host and treatment factors. RESULTS: Controlling for other host and treatment factors and compared with patients with isolates without gyr resistance mutations, "high-level" gyr mutations significantly predict poor treatment outcomes with a hazard ratio of 2.6 (1.2-5.6). We observed a hazard of death and treatment failure with "intermediate-level" gyr mutations of 1.3 (0.6-3.1), which did not reach statistical significance. The gyr mutations were not different than culture-based FQ drug susceptibility testing in predicting the hazard of death or treatment failure and may be superior. CONCLUSIONS: FQ molecular-based diagnostic tests may better predict treatment response than traditional drug susceptibility testing and open avenues for personalizing TB therapy.
Authors: Joia S Mukherjee; Michael L Rich; Adrienne R Socci; J Keith Joseph; Felix Alcántara Virú; Sonya S Shin; Jennifer J Furin; Mercedes C Becerra; Donna J Barry; Jim Yong Kim; Jaime Bayona; Paul Farmer; Mary C Smith Fawzi; Kwonjune J Seung Journal: Lancet Date: 2004-02-07 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: K F Laserson; L E Thorpe; V Leimane; K Weyer; C D Mitnick; V Riekstina; E Zarovska; M L Rich; H S F Fraser; E Alarcón; J P Cegielski; M Grzemska; R Gupta; M Espinal Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: M R Farhat; C D Mitnick; M F Franke; D Kaur; A Sloutsky; M Murray; K R Jacobson Journal: Int J Tuberc Lung Dis Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Catharina C Boehme; Pamela Nabeta; Doris Hillemann; Mark P Nicol; Shubhada Shenai; Fiorella Krapp; Jenny Allen; Rasim Tahirli; Robert Blakemore; Roxana Rustomjee; Ana Milovic; Martin Jones; Sean M O'Brien; David H Persing; Sabine Ruesch-Gerdes; Eduardo Gotuzzo; Camilla Rodrigues; David Alland; Mark D Perkins Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-01 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carole D Mitnick; Sonya S Shin; Kwonjune J Seung; Michael L Rich; Sidney S Atwood; Jennifer J Furin; Garrett M Fitzmaurice; Felix A Alcantara Viru; Sasha C Appleton; Jaime N Bayona; Cesar A Bonilla; Katiuska Chalco; Sharon Choi; Molly F Franke; Hamish S F Fraser; Dalia Guerra; Rocio M Hurtado; Darius Jazayeri; Keith Joseph; Karim Llaro; Lorena Mestanza; Joia S Mukherjee; Maribel Muñoz; Eda Palacios; Epifanio Sanchez; Alexander Sloutsky; Mercedes C Becerra Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2008-08-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Carole Mitnick; Jaime Bayona; Eda Palacios; Sonya Shin; Jennifer Furin; Felix Alcántara; Epifanio Sánchez; Madeleny Sarria; Mercedes Becerra; Mary C Smith Fawzi; Saidi Kapiga; Donna Neuberg; James H Maguire; Jim Yong Kim; Paul Farmer Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-01-09 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Maha R Farhat; Karen R Jacobson; Molly F Franke; Devinder Kaur; Alex Sloutsky; Carole D Mitnick; Megan Murray Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Timothy M Walker; Thomas A Kohl; Shaheed V Omar; Jessica Hedge; Carlos Del Ojo Elias; Phelim Bradley; Zamin Iqbal; Silke Feuerriegel; Katherine E Niehaus; Daniel J Wilson; David A Clifton; Georgia Kapatai; Camilla L C Ip; Rory Bowden; Francis A Drobniewski; Caroline Allix-Béguec; Cyril Gaudin; Julian Parkhill; Roland Diel; Philip Supply; Derrick W Crook; E Grace Smith; A Sarah Walker; Nazir Ismail; Stefan Niemann; Tim E A Peto Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-06-23 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Matthias I Gröschel; Timothy M Walker; Tjip S van der Werf; Christoph Lange; Stefan Niemann; Matthias Merker Journal: PLoS Pathog Date: 2018-10-18 Impact factor: 6.823