Literature DB >> 21537003

Mechanical coupling between myofibroblasts and cardiomyocytes slows electric conduction in fibrotic cell monolayers.

Susan A Thompson1, Craig R Copeland, Daniel H Reich, Leslie Tung.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: After cardiac injury, activated cardiac myofibroblasts can influence tissue electrophysiology. Because mechanical coupling through adherens junctions provides a route for intercellular communication, we tested the hypothesis that myofibroblasts exert tonic contractile forces on the cardiomyocytes and affect electric propagation via a process of mechanoelectric feedback. METHODS AND
RESULTS: The role of mechanoelectric feedback was examined in transforming growth factor-β-treated monolayers of cocultured myofibroblasts and neonatal rat ventricular cells by inhibiting myofibroblast contraction and blocking mechanosensitive channels. Untreated (control) and transforming growth factor-β-treated (fibrotic) anisotropic monolayers were optically mapped for electrophysiological comparison. Longitudinal conduction velocity, transverse conduction velocity, and normalized action potential upstroke velocity (dV/dt(max)) significantly decreased in fibrotic monolayers (14.4 ± 0.7 cm/s [mean ± SEM], 4.1 ± 0.3 cm/s [n=53], and 3.1 ± 0.2% per ms [n=14], respectively) compared with control monolayers (27.2 ± 0.8 cm/s, 8.5 ± 0.4 cm/s [n=40], and 4.9 ± 0.1% per ms [n=12], respectively). Application of the excitation-contraction uncoupler blebbistatin or the mechanosensitive channel blocker gadolinium or streptomycin dramatically increased longitudinal conduction velocity, transverse conduction velocity, and dV/dt(max) in fibrotic monolayers (35.9 ± 1.5 cm/s, 10.3 ± 0.6 cm/s [n=17], and 4.5 ± 0.1% per ms [n=14], respectively). Similar results were observed with connexin43-silenced cardiac myofibroblasts. Spiral-wave induction in fibrotic monolayers also decreased after the aforementioned treatments. Finally, traction force measurements of individual myofibroblasts showed a significant increase with transforming growth factor-β, a decrease with blebbistatin, and no change with mechanosensitive channel blockers.
CONCLUSIONS: These observations suggest that myofibroblast-myocyte mechanical interactions develop during cardiac injury, and that cardiac conduction may be impaired as a result of increased mechanosensitive channel activation owing to tension applied to the myocyte by the myofibroblast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21537003      PMCID: PMC3176459          DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  39 in total

Review 1.  Myofibroblasts and mechano-regulation of connective tissue remodelling.

Authors:  James J Tomasek; Giulio Gabbiani; Boris Hinz; Christine Chaponnier; Robert A Brown
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 94.444

2.  Stretch-activated currents in ventricular myocytes: amplitude and arrhythmogenic effects increase with hypertrophy.

Authors:  A Kamkin; I Kiseleva; G Isenberg
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 3.  The myofibroblast in wound healing and fibrocontractive diseases.

Authors:  G Gabbiani
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 7.996

4.  Coupling of cardiac electrical activity over extended distances by fibroblasts of cardiac origin.

Authors:  Giedrius Gaudesius; Michele Miragoli; Stuart P Thomas; Stephan Rohr
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2003-07-31       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Electrotonic modulation of cardiac impulse conduction by myofibroblasts.

Authors:  Michele Miragoli; Giedrius Gaudesius; Stephan Rohr
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2006-02-16       Impact factor: 17.367

6.  Differences in gap junction channels between cardiac myocytes, fibroblasts, and heterologous pairs.

Authors:  M B Rook; A C van Ginneken; B de Jonge; A el Aoumari; D Gros; H J Jongsma
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1992-11

Review 7.  TGF-beta and fibrosis.

Authors:  M H Branton; J B Kopp
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.700

8.  Transforming growth factor-beta1 promotes the morphological and functional differentiation of the myofibroblast.

Authors:  M B Vaughan; E W Howard; J J Tomasek
Journal:  Exp Cell Res       Date:  2000-05-25       Impact factor: 3.905

9.  Myofibroblasts in reperfused myocardial infarcts express the embryonic form of smooth muscle myosin heavy chain (SMemb).

Authors:  N G Frangogiannis; L H Michael; M L Entman
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.787

Review 10.  Cardiac fibroblasts and the mechano-electric feedback mechanism in healthy and diseased hearts.

Authors:  Andre Kamkin; Irina Kiseleva; Gerrit Isenberg; Kay Dietrich Wagner; Joachim Günther; Heinz Theres; Holger Scholz
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2003 May-Jul       Impact factor: 3.667

View more
  67 in total

1.  Functional scaffold-free 3-D cardiac microtissues: a novel model for the investigation of heart cells.

Authors:  B R Desroches; P Zhang; B-R Choi; M E King; A E Maldonado; W Li; A Rago; G Liu; N Nath; K M Hartmann; B Yang; G Koren; J R Morgan; U Mende
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 4.733

Review 2.  How does the urothelium affect bladder function in health and disease? ICI-RS 2011.

Authors:  L A Birder; M Ruggieri; M Takeda; G van Koeveringe; S Veltkamp; C Korstanje; B Parsons; C H Fry
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 2.696

Review 3.  Biomechanics of cardiac electromechanical coupling and mechanoelectric feedback.

Authors:  Emily R Pfeiffer; Jared R Tangney; Jeffrey H Omens; Andrew D McCulloch
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.097

4.  The applicability of furfuryl-gelatin as a novel bioink for tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Shweta AnilKumar; Shane C Allen; Nishat Tasnim; Tahmina Akter; Shinhye Park; Alok Kumar; Munmun Chattopadhyay; Yoshihiro Ito; Laura J Suggs; Binata Joddar
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2018-04-15       Impact factor: 3.368

5.  Putting the pieces together using in vivo optical mapping.

Authors:  Lianguo Wang; Crystal M Ripplinger
Journal:  Cardiovasc Res       Date:  2019-09-01       Impact factor: 10.787

6.  Strength-duration relationship as a tool to prioritize cardiac tissue properties that govern electrical excitability.

Authors:  Michael N Sayegh; Natasha Fernandez; Hee Cheol Cho
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2019-03-29       Impact factor: 4.733

7.  Gq-activated fibroblasts induce cardiomyocyte action potential prolongation and automaticity in a three-dimensional microtissue environment.

Authors:  C M Kofron; T Y Kim; M E King; A Xie; F Feng; E Park; Z Qu; B-R Choi; U Mende
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 4.733

8.  Engineered 3D Cardiac Fibrotic Tissue to Study Fibrotic Remodeling.

Authors:  Amir Hossein Sadeghi; Su Ryon Shin; Janine C Deddens; Giuseppe Fratta; Serena Mandla; Iman K Yazdi; Gyan Prakash; Silvia Antona; Danilo Demarchi; Marc P Buijsrogge; Joost P G Sluijter; Jesper Hjortnaes; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 9.  In vitro models of the cardiac microenvironment to study myocyte and non-myocyte crosstalk: bioinspired approaches beyond the polystyrene dish.

Authors:  Celinda M Kofron; Ulrike Mende
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Effect of Substrate Stiffness on Mechanical Coupling and Force Propagation at the Infarct Boundary.

Authors:  Dung Trung Nguyen; Neerajha Nagarajan; Pinar Zorlutuna
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.