Literature DB >> 2899832

Midgestational exposure of pregnant BALB/c mice to magnetic resonance imaging conditions.

W L Heinrichs1, P Fong, M Flannery, S C Heinrichs, L E Crooks, A Spindle, R A Pedersen.   

Abstract

The potential for producing reproductive toxicity or teratogenesis in mice by exposure to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) conditions was evaluated by means of reproduction studies and the homeotic shift test. Embryos from pregnant BALB/c mice were exposed in vivo for 16 hours beginning on gestation day 8.75 to MRI conditions of modest field strength (static field, 0.35 tesla (T); pulsed gradients, 2.3 X 10(-4) T/cm for 2.5 to 10 msec; and radio frequency, 15 MHz at an average of 61.2 mW). Unexposed, sham-exposed (both MRI and X-ray) and X-irradiated (0.5 Gy) animals were the control groups. Neither placental resorptions nor stillbirths were increased by MRI. Fetal weight at birth and crown-rump length were proportional; however, crown-rump length was significantly less (p less than 0.001) in the MRI-exposed fetuses (respective mean values for MRI-exposed fetuses were 21.8 +/- 0.2 mm compared to 22.4 +/- 0.1 for sham-exposed fetuses). Both crown-rump length and fetal weight were significantly reduced after X-irradiation. The percentage of homeotic skeletal shifts was scored for each of eight anatomic sites. Only X-radiation produced significant increases in skeletal shifts. Prolonged midgestational exposure of mice to MRI conditions currently used for human clinical imaging, therefore, failed to reveal overt embryotoxicity (resorptions, stillbirths) or teratogenicity (homeotic shifts), consistent with the non-ionizing properties of MR. However, the slight but significant reduction in fetal crown-rump length after prolonged exposure justifies further study of higher MRI energy levels and consideration of other endpoints for establishing with greater confidence the safety of MRI during pregnancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 2899832     DOI: 10.1016/0730-725x(88)90407-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  11 in total

1.  In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance at 4.7 tesla.

Authors:  B D Tunggal; K Hofmann; W Stoffel; K Oette; H Diekmann; M Walger; H von Wedel
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1992-11

Review 2.  MRI evaluation and safety in the developing brain.

Authors:  Shannon Tocchio; Beth Kline-Fath; Emanuel Kanal; Vincent J Schmithorst; Ashok Panigrahy
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-03-03       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance imaging. Application to family practice.

Authors:  R H Goh; S Somers; E Jurriaans; J Yu
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Differential diagnoses of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected acute appendicitis in pregnant patients.

Authors:  Ji Yong Jung; Ji Ung Na; Sang Kuk Han; Pil Cho Choi; Jang Hee Lee; Dong Hyuk Shin
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2018

5.  Acute ischaemic stroke in pregnancy: a severe complication of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  Andrea Bartkova; Daniel Sanak; Jiri Dostal; Roman Herzig; Pavel Otruba; Ivanka Vlachova; Petr Hlustik; David Horak; Petr Kanovsky
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 3.307

6.  The developing role of fetal magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of congenital cardiac anomalies: A systematic review.

Authors:  Rohit S Loomba; Suraj Chandrasekar; Parinda H Shah; Prateek Sanan
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  Multiple sclerosis and pregnancy; What a neurologist may be asked for?

Authors:  Bahaadin Siroos; Mohammad Hossein Harirchian
Journal:  Iran J Neurol       Date:  2014-04-03

8.  Effects of Gestational Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Methylation Status of Leptin Promoter in the Placenta and Cord Blood.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Feng-Shan Yan; Jian-Min Lian; She-Wei Dou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Patient safety issues in magnetic resonance imaging: state of the art.

Authors:  A Stecco; A Saponaro; A Carriero
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-06-11       Impact factor: 6.313

10.  Biological Effects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging on Testis Histology and Seminiferous Tubules Morphometry.

Authors:  Ayoob Rostamzadeh; Seyed Hadi Anjamrooz; Mohammad Jafar Rezaie; Fardin Fathi; Mohsen Mohammadi
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2019-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.