Amit M Momaya1, John M Tokish2. 1. Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, 200 Patewood Drive, Suite C100, Greenville, SC, 29615, USA. 2. Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, 200 Patewood Drive, Suite C100, Greenville, SC, 29615, USA. Jtoke95@aol.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the recent evolution in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability and the dynamic interaction between the glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesion. RECENT FINDINGS: Through the glenoid track concept, glenoid- and humeral-sided bone loss are evolving away from being approached as separate entities. Recent cadaveric studies have validated the glenoid track concept. Moreover, a recent clinical study has demonstrated a much higher rate of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulders that were off track. The glenoid track concept is a useful tool in evaluating patients with anterior shoulder instability. Shoulders that are off track may require more than a simple arthroscopic Bankart, and the addition of a remplissage or bony transfer may be considered.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the recent evolution in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability and the dynamic interaction between the glenoid and Hill-Sachs lesion. RECENT FINDINGS: Through the glenoid track concept, glenoid- and humeral-sided bone loss are evolving away from being approached as separate entities. Recent cadaveric studies have validated the glenoid track concept. Moreover, a recent clinical study has demonstrated a much higher rate of failure after arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulders that were off track. The glenoid track concept is a useful tool in evaluating patients with anterior shoulder instability. Shoulders that are off track may require more than a simple arthroscopic Bankart, and the addition of a remplissage or bony transfer may be considered.
Authors: Robert U Hartzler; Christopher N H Bui; Woong K Jeong; Masaki Akeda; Alex Peterson; Michelle McGarry; Patrick J Denard; Stephen S Burkhart; Thay Q Lee Journal: Arthroscopy Date: 2016-07-16 Impact factor: 4.772
Authors: Scott R Montgomery; J Christoph Katthagen; Jacob D Mikula; Daniel Cole Marchetti; Dimitri S Tahal; Grant J Dornan; Kimi D Dahl; Alex W Brady; Travis Lee Turnbull; Peter J Millett Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2017-02-14 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Adrian K Schneider; Gregory A Hoy; Eugene T Ek; Andrew H Rotstein; Julie Tate; David McD Taylor; Matthew C Evans Journal: J Shoulder Elbow Surg Date: 2016-12-15 Impact factor: 3.019
Authors: Robert A Arciero; Anthony Parrino; Andrew S Bernhardson; Vilmaris Diaz-Doran; Elifho Obopilwe; Mark P Cote; Petr Golijanin; Augustus D Mazzocca; Matthew T Provencher Journal: Am J Sports Med Date: 2015-03-20 Impact factor: 6.202
Authors: Travis L Frantz; Joshua S Everhart; Gregory L Cvetanovich; Andrew Neviaser; Grant L Jones; Carolyn M Hettrich; Brian R Wolf; Julie Bishop; Bruce Miller; Robert H Brophy; C Benjamin Ma; Charlie L Cox; Keith M Baumgarten; Brian T Feeley; Alan L Zhang; Eric C McCarty; John E Kuhn Journal: Orthop J Sports Med Date: 2020-02-27
Authors: Andre Couto Godinho; Pedro Couto Godinho; Flávio de Oliveira França; Elísio José Salgado Ribeiro; Daniel Carvalho de Toledo; Guilherme Henrique Franco Journal: Rev Bras Ortop (Sao Paulo) Date: 2020-10-29
Authors: André Couto Godinho; Pedro Couto Godinho; Elísio José Salgado Ribeiro; Daniel Carvalho de Toledo; Frederico de Menezes Figueiredo Couto Bem; Armando D'Lucca de Castro E Silva; Glaydson Gomes Godinho Journal: JSES Int Date: 2021-04-28