Literature DB >> 17644006

Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track.

Nobuyuki Yamamoto1, Eiji Itoi, Hidekazu Abe, Hiroshi Minagawa, Nobutoshi Seki, Yoichi Shimada, Kyoji Okada.   

Abstract

To date, no anatomic or biomechanical studies have been conducted to clarify what size of a Hill-Sachs lesion needs to be treated. Nine fresh-frozen cadaveric shoulders were tested in a custom device. With the arm in maximum external rotation, horizontal extension, and 0 degrees, 30 degrees, and 60 degrees of abduction, the location of the entire rim of the glenoid was marked on the humeral head using a Kirschner wire. The distance from the contact area to the footprint of the rotator cuff with the arm in 60 degrees of abduction was measured by a digital caliper. With an increase in arm elevation, the glenoid contact shifted from the inferomedial to the superolateral portion of the posterior aspect of the humeral head, creating a zone of contact (glenoid track). The medial margin of the glenoid track was located 18.4 +/- 2.5 mm medial from the footprint, which was equivalent to 84% +/- 14% of the glenoid width. A Hill-Sachs lesion has a risk of engagement and dislocation if it extends medially over the medial margin of the glenoid track.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17644006     DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2006.12.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg        ISSN: 1058-2746            Impact factor:   3.019


  124 in total

Review 1.  [Update on shoulder surgery 2010: current treatment strategies for traumatic lesions of the shoulder].

Authors:  M Wellmann; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Arthroscopic reconstruction of the glenoid concavity with an autologous bone block procedure].

Authors:  M Scheibel; N Kraus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Arthroscopic Bankart repair: Have we finally reached a gold standard?

Authors:  Alessandro Castagna; Raffaele Garofalo; Marco Conti; Brody Flanagin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-29       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  History of shoulder instability surgery.

Authors:  Pietro Randelli; Davide Cucchi; Usman Butt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-12-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Arthroscopic stabilisation for shoulder instability.

Authors:  Konstantinos Fountzoulas; Syed Hassan; Al-Achraf Khoriati; Chu-Hao Chiang; Nicholas Little; Vipul Patel
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2019-07-17

6.  Anatomic Humeral Head Reconstruction With Fresh Osteochondral Talus Allograft for Recurrent Glenohumeral Instability With Reverse Hill-Sachs Lesion.

Authors:  Matthew T Provencher; George Sanchez; Katrina Schantz; Marcio Ferrari; Anthony Sanchez; Salvatore Frangiamore; Sandeep Mannava
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-02-27

7.  Off-track Hill-Sachs lesions do not increase postoperative recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair with selective Remplissage procedure.

Authors:  In Park; Jun-Seok Kang; Yoon-Geol Jo; Sang-Woo Kim; Sang-Jin Shin
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Management of humeral head deficiencies and glenoid track.

Authors:  Giovanni Di Giacomo; Andrea De Vita; Alberto Costantini; Nicola de Gasperis; Paolo Scarso
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-03

9.  Combined All-arthroscopic Hill-Sachs Remplissage, Latarjet, and Bankart Repair in Patients With Bipolar Glenohumeral Bone Loss.

Authors:  David Saliken; Vincent Lavoué; Christophe Trojani; Jean-François Gonzalez; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2017-10-30

10.  [Bony Bankart lesions].

Authors:  U J Spiegl; S Braun; S A Euler; R J Warth; P J Millett
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.