Literature DB >> 28992359

A study of CDR3 loop dynamics reveals distinct mechanisms of peptide recognition by T-cell receptors exhibiting different levels of cross-reactivity.

Yuko Tsuchiya1, Yoshiki Namiuchi2, Hiroshi Wako3, Hiromichi Tsurui4.   

Abstract

T-cell receptors (TCRs) can productively interact with many different peptides bound within the MHC binding groove. This property varies with the level of cross-reactivity of TCRs; some TCRs are particularly hyper cross-reactive while others exhibit greater specificity. To elucidate the mechanism behind these differences, we studied five TCRs in complex with the same class II MHC (1Ab )-peptide (3K), that are known to exhibit different levels of cross-reactivity. Although these complexes have similar binding affinities, the interface areas between the TCR and the peptide-MHC (pMHC) differ significantly. We investigated static and dynamic structural features of the TCR-pMHC complexes and of TCRs in a free state, as well as the relationship between binding affinity and interface area. It was found that the TCRs known to exhibit lower levels of cross-reactivity bound to pMHC using an induced-fitting mechanism, forming large and tight interfaces rich in specific hydrogen bonds. In contrast, TCRs known to exhibit high levels of cross-reactivity used a more rigid binding mechanism where non-specific π-interactions involving the bulky Trp residue in CDR3β dominated. As entropy loss upon binding in these highly degenerate and rigid TCRs is smaller than that in less degenerate TCRs, they can better tolerate changes in residues distal from the major contacts with MHC-bound peptide. Hence, our dynamics study revealed that differences in the peptide recognition mechanisms by TCRs appear to correlate with the levels of T-cell cross-reactivity.
© 2017 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CH-π interactions; binding affinity-interface area relationship; cross-reactive T-cell receptor recognition; fragment molecular orbital method; molecular dynamics simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28992359      PMCID: PMC5838422          DOI: 10.1111/imm.12849

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Immunology        ISSN: 0019-2805            Impact factor:   7.397


  34 in total

1.  Alternate interactions define the binding of peptides to the MHC molecule IA(b).

Authors:  Xinqi Liu; Shaodong Dai; Frances Crawford; Rachel Fruge; Philippa Marrack; John Kappler
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-06-25       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Analyses of homo-oligomer interfaces of proteins from the complementarity of molecular surface, electrostatic potential and hydrophobicity.

Authors:  Yuko Tsuchiya; Kengo Kinoshita; Haruki Nakamura
Journal:  Protein Eng Des Sel       Date:  2006-07-12       Impact factor: 1.650

3.  How a single T cell receptor recognizes both self and foreign MHC.

Authors:  Leremy A Colf; Alexander J Bankovich; Nicole A Hanick; Natalie A Bowerman; Lindsay L Jones; David M Kranz; K Christopher Garcia
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2007-04-06       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Structural basis of plasticity in T cell receptor recognition of a self peptide-MHC antigen.

Authors:  K C Garcia; M Degano; L R Pease; M Huang; P A Peterson; L Teyton; I A Wilson
Journal:  Science       Date:  1998-02-20       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Solvent-accessible surfaces of proteins and nucleic acids.

Authors:  M L Connolly
Journal:  Science       Date:  1983-08-19       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Effect of CDR3 sequences and distal V gene residues in regulating TCR-MHC contacts and ligand specificity.

Authors:  Brian D Stadinski; Peter Trenh; Brian Duke; Priya G Huseby; Guoqi Li; Lawrence J Stern; Eric S Huseby
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 5.422

Review 7.  The molecular basis of TCR germline bias for MHC is surprisingly simple.

Authors:  K Christopher Garcia; Jarrett J Adams; Dan Feng; Lauren K Ely
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 8.  Thermodynamics of T-cell receptor-peptide/MHC interactions: progress and opportunities.

Authors:  Kathryn M Armstrong; Francis K Insaidoo; Brian M Baker
Journal:  J Mol Recognit       Date:  2008 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.137

9.  Crossreactivity of a human autoimmune TCR is dominated by a single TCR loop.

Authors:  Dhruv K Sethi; Susana Gordo; David A Schubert; Kai W Wucherpfennig
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  A highly tilted binding mode by a self-reactive T cell receptor results in altered engagement of peptide and MHC.

Authors:  Dhruv K Sethi; David A Schubert; Anne-Kathrin Anders; Annie Heroux; Daniel A Bonsor; Chantz P Thomas; Eric J Sundberg; Jason Pyrdol; Kai W Wucherpfennig
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2011-01-03       Impact factor: 14.307

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Revealing factors determining immunodominant responses against dominant epitopes.

Authors:  Wannisa Ritmahan; Can Kesmir; Renske M A Vroomans
Journal:  Immunogenetics       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 2.846

2.  Peptide Centric Vβ Specific Germline Contacts Shape a Specialist T Cell Response.

Authors:  Yang Wang; Alexandra Tsitsiklis; Stephanie Devoe; Wei Gao; H Hamlet Chu; Yan Zhang; Wei Li; Wing Ki Wong; Charlotte M Deane; David Neau; Jill E Slansky; Paul G Thomas; Ellen A Robey; Shaodong Dai
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 8.786

3.  MHC binding affects the dynamics of different T-cell receptors in different ways.

Authors:  Bernhard Knapp; P Anton van der Merwe; Omer Dushek; Charlotte M Deane
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 4.  Predicting Cross-Reactivity and Antigen Specificity of T Cell Receptors.

Authors:  Chloe H Lee; Mariolina Salio; Giorgio Napolitani; Graham Ogg; Alison Simmons; Hashem Koohy
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.561

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.