Gauri R Karur1, Ron Wald2,3, Marc B Goldstein2,3, Rachel Wald3,4, Laura Jimenez-Juan3,5, Mercedeh Kiaii6, Jonathon Leipsic7, Anish Kirpalani1,3, Olugbenga Bello8, Ashita Barthur1, Ming-Yen Ng9, Djeven P Deva1,3, Andrew T Yan3,8. 1. Department of Medical Imaging, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Keenan Research Centre, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 2. Division of Nephrology, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 3. University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 4. Division of Cardiology, Toronto General Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 6. Division of Nephrology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 7. Department of Radiology and Division of Cardiology, St Paul's Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. 8. Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 9. University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
Abstract
Background: In-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) is associated with favorable left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Although right ventricular (RV) structure and function carry prognostic significance, the impact of dialysis intensification on RV is unknown. Our objectives were to evaluate changes in RV mass index (MI), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI) and ejection fraction (EF) after conversion to INHD and their relationship with LV remodeling. Methods: Of 67 conventional hemodialysis (CHD, 4 h/session, three times/week) patients, 30 continued on CHD and 37 converted to INHD (7-8 h/session, three times/week). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and 1 year using a standardized protocol; an experienced and blinded reader performed RV measurements. Results: At 1 year there were significant reductions in RVMI {-2.1 g/m2 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to - 0.4], P = 0.017}, RVEDVI [-9.5 mL/m2 (95% CI - 16.3 to - 2.6), P = 0.008] and RVESVI [-6.2 mL/m2 (95% CI - 10.9 to - 1.6), P = 0.011] in the INHD group; no significant changes were observed in the CHD group. Between-group comparisons showed significantly greater reduction of RVESVI [-7.9 mL/m2 (95% CI - 14.9 to - 0.9), P = 0.03] in the INHD group, a nonsignificant trend toward greater reduction in RVEDVI and no significant difference in RVMI and RVEF changes. There was significant correlation between LV and RV in terms of changes in mass index (MI) (r = 0.46), EDVI (r = 0.73), ESVI (r = 0.7) and EF (r = 0.38) over 1 year (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: Conversion to INHD was associated with a significant reduction of RVESVI. Temporal changes in RV mass, volume and function paralleled those of LV. Our findings support the need for larger, longer-term studies to confirm favorable RV remodeling and determine its impact on clinical outcomes.
Background: In-center nocturnal hemodialysis (INHD) is associated with favorable left ventricular (LV) remodeling. Although right ventricular (RV) structure and function carry prognostic significance, the impact of dialysis intensification on RV is unknown. Our objectives were to evaluate changes in RV mass index (MI), end-diastolic volume index (EDVI), end-systolic volume index (ESVI) and ejection fraction (EF) after conversion to INHD and their relationship with LV remodeling. Methods: Of 67 conventional hemodialysis (CHD, 4 h/session, three times/week) patients, 30 continued on CHD and 37 converted to INHD (7-8 h/session, three times/week). Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was performed at baseline and 1 year using a standardized protocol; an experienced and blinded reader performed RV measurements. Results: At 1 year there were significant reductions in RVMI {-2.1 g/m2 [95% confidence interval (CI) -3.8 to - 0.4], P = 0.017}, RVEDVI [-9.5 mL/m2 (95% CI - 16.3 to - 2.6), P = 0.008] and RVESVI [-6.2 mL/m2 (95% CI - 10.9 to - 1.6), P = 0.011] in the INHD group; no significant changes were observed in the CHD group. Between-group comparisons showed significantly greater reduction of RVESVI [-7.9 mL/m2 (95% CI - 14.9 to - 0.9), P = 0.03] in the INHD group, a nonsignificant trend toward greater reduction in RVEDVI and no significant difference in RVMI and RVEF changes. There was significant correlation between LV and RV in terms of changes in mass index (MI) (r = 0.46), EDVI (r = 0.73), ESVI (r = 0.7) and EF (r = 0.38) over 1 year (all P < 0.01). Conclusions: Conversion to INHD was associated with a significant reduction of RVESVI. Temporal changes in RV mass, volume and function paralleled those of LV. Our findings support the need for larger, longer-term studies to confirm favorable RV remodeling and determine its impact on clinical outcomes.
Authors: Ron Wald; Marc B Goldstein; Jeffrey Perl; Mercedeh Kiaii; Darren Yuen; Rachel M Wald; Ziv Harel; Jordan J Weinstein; Baruch Jakubovic; Howard Leong-Poi; Anish Kirpalani; Jonathon Leipsic; Niki Dacouris; Myles Wolf; Andrew T Yan Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Bruce F Culleton; Michael Walsh; Scott W Klarenbach; Garth Mortis; Narine Scott-Douglas; Robert R Quinn; Marcello Tonelli; Sarah Donnelly; Matthias G Friedrich; Andreas Kumar; Houman Mahallati; Brenda R Hemmelgarn; Braden J Manns Journal: JAMA Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Ankur Gulati; Tevfik F Ismail; Andrew Jabbour; Francisco Alpendurada; Kaushik Guha; Nizar A Ismail; Sadaf Raza; Jahanzaib Khwaja; Tristan D H Brown; Kishen Morarji; Emmanouil Liodakis; Michael Roughton; Ricardo Wage; Tapesh C Pakrashi; Rakesh Sharma; John-Paul Carpenter; Stuart A Cook; Martin R Cowie; Ravi G Assomull; Dudley J Pennell; Sanjay K Prasad Journal: Circulation Date: 2013-08-21 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher T Chan; Tom Greene; Glenn M Chertow; Alan S Kliger; John B Stokes; Gerald J Beck; John T Daugirdas; Peter Kotanko; Brett Larive; Nathan W Levin; Ravindra L Mehta; Michael Rocco; Javier Sanz; Phillip C Yang; Sanjay Rajagopalan Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2013-08-22 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Nadine Kawel-Boehm; Alicia Maceira; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo-Buechel; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Evrim B Turkbey; Rupert Williams; Sven Plein; Michael Tee; John Eng; David A Bluemke Journal: J Cardiovasc Magn Reson Date: 2015-04-18 Impact factor: 5.364
Authors: Tamryn K Law; Ron Wald; Marc Goldstein; Gauri R Karur; Ming-Yen Ng; Angela Y M Wang; Djeven P Deva; Anish Kirpalani; Rachel M Wald; Mercedeh Kiaii; Jonathon Leipsic; Kim A Connelly; Andrew T Yan Journal: J Nephrol Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 3.902