| Literature DB >> 28991894 |
Jack E T Grimes1, Gemechu Tadesse2, Iain A Gardiner3, Elodie Yard3, Yonas Wuletaw2, Michael R Templeton1, Wendy E Harrison4, Lesley J Drake3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Inadequate nutrition; neglected topical diseases; and insufficient water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are interrelated problems in schools in low-income countries, but are not routinely tackled together. A recent three-year longitudinal study investigated integrated school health and nutrition approaches in 30 government primary schools in southern Ethiopia. Here, we report on baseline associations between sanitation, hookworm infection, anemia, stunting, and wasting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28991894 PMCID: PMC5633169 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0005948
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS Negl Trop Dis ISSN: 1935-2727
Fig 1The school and woreda locations within SNNPR (A), and the position of SNNPR within Ethiopia (B).
This figure was made using administrative boundaries from the GADM database of Global Administrative Areas [20].
Fig 2The distributions of children’s hookworm infection intensities, according to the two sanitation risk factors.
Bar heights represent the percentages of the hookworm infection intensities, in children with each sanitation response. The number of children with each sanitation-hookworm infection intensity class combination is given by n. Light, moderate, and heavy hookworm infections were defined as 1–1,999, 2,000–3,999, and 4,000 EPG or more, respectively [22].
Fixed effects from the mixed-effects logistic regression for hookworm infection.
This model used data from the 413 students between the ages of 5 and 18 years, and with complete data for the included variables. Of these 413 students, 71 (17%) were positive for hookworm. The variance (in the logit scale) of the random intercept for school in this model was 1.17.
| Prevalence of this risk factor | Prevalence of hookworm infection in participants with this risk factor | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latrine at home? | Yes | 303/413 (73%) | 51/303 (17%) | Reference | - | - |
| No | 110/413 (27%) | 20/110 (18%) | 1.28 | [0.476, 3.44] | 0.6 | |
| Evidence of open defecation at home? | No | 295/413 (71%) | 49/295 (17%) | Reference | - | - |
| Yes | 118/413 (29%) | 22/118 (19%) | 1.21 | [0.468, 3.12] | 0.7 | |
| Gender | Female | 212/413 (51%) | 35/212 (17%) | Reference | - | - |
| Male | 201/413 (49%) | 36/201 (18%) | 1.15 | [0.641, 2.07] | 0.6 | |
| Age (years) | 5 to 10 | 109/413 (26%) | 16/109 (15%) | Reference | - | - |
| 11 to 12 | 138/413 (33%) | 24/138 (17%) | 1.49 | [0.645, 3.43] | 0.4 | |
| 13 to 18 | 166/413 (40%) | 31/166 (19%) | 1.65 | [0.735, 3.69] | 0.2 | |
| School cluster | 1 | 152/413 (37%) | 11/152 (7.2%) | Reference | - | - |
| 2 | 53/413 (13%) | 23/53 (43%) | 16.7 | [3.32, 84.4] | < 0.001 | |
| 3 | 140/413 (34%) | 31/140 (22%) | 4.60 | [1.26, 16.8] | 0.02 | |
| 4 | 68/413 (16%) | 6/68 (8.8%) | 1.32 | [0.245, 7.15] | 0.7 | |
Fig 3The distributions of children’s anemia, stunting, and wasting classifications according to their hookworm infection intensities.
Bar heights represent the percentages of each anemia, stunting, and wasting severity, in children with each hookworm infection intensity class. The number of children with each hookworm infection intensity-anemia/stunting/wasting class combination is given by n. Light, moderate, and heavy hookworm infections were defined as 1–1,999, 2,000–3,999, and 4,000 EPG or more, respectively [22]. Mild stunting and wasting were defined as zHFA and zBMI values between -2 and -3, respectively, and severe stunting and wasting values below -3. Anemia classes were calculated using blood hemoglobin concentrations, taking into account age, gender, and elevation [23].
Fixed effects from the mixed-effects logistic regression for anemia.
This model used data from the 3,672 students between the ages of 5 and 18 years, and with complete data for the included variables. Of these 3,672 students, 850 (23%) were anemic. The variance (in the logit scale) of the random intercept for school in this model was 0.487.
| Prevalence of this risk factor | Prevalence of anemia in participants with this risk factor | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworm infection | Negative | 2993/3672 (82%) | 655/2993 (22%) | Reference | - | - |
| Positive | 679/3672 (18%) | 195/679 (29%) | 1.24 | [0.988, 1.57] | 0.06 | |
| Gender | Female | 1742/3672 (47%) | 371/1742 (21%) | Reference | - | - |
| Male | 1930/3672 (53%) | 479/1930 (25%) | 1.27 | [1.08, 1.49] | 0.004 | |
| Age (years) | 5 to 10 | 973/3672 (26%) | 214/973 (22%) | Reference | - | - |
| 11 to 12 | 1366/3672 (37%) | 305/1366 (22%) | 1.13 | [0.914, 1.41] | 0.3 | |
| 13 to 18 | 1333/3672 (36%) | 331/1333 (25%) | 1.14 | [0.906, 1.42] | 0.3 | |
| School cluster | 1 | 1345/3672 (37%) | 278/1345 (21%) | Reference | - | - |
| 2 | 483/3672 (13%) | 186/483 (39%) | 2.57 | [1.11, 5.98] | 0.03 | |
| 3 | 1229/3672 (33%) | 198/1229 (16%) | 0.747 | [0.393, 1.42] | 0.4 | |
| 4 | 615/3672 (17%) | 188/615 (31%) | 1.87 | [0.859, 4.05] | 0.1 | |
Fixed effects from the mixed-effects logistic regression for with stunting.
This model used data from the 3,686 students between the ages of 5 and 18 years, and with complete data for the included variables. Of these 3,686 students, 1,019 (28%) were stunted. The variance (in the logit scale) of the random intercept for school in this model was 1.16.
| Prevalence of this risk factor | Prevalence of stunting in participants with this risk factor | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworm infection | Negative | 3007/3686 (82%) | 795/3007 (26%) | Reference | - | - |
| Positive | 679/3686 (18%) | 224/679 (33%) | 0.992 | [0.789, 1.25] | 0.9 | |
| Gender | Female | 1754/3686 (48%) | 469/1754 (27%) | Reference | - | - |
| Male | 1932/3686 (52%) | 550/1932 (28%) | 1.15 | [0.979, 1.36] | 0.09 | |
| Age (years) | 5 to 10 | 984/3686 (27%) | 209/984 (21%) | Reference | - | - |
| 11 to 12 | 1368/3686 (37%) | 372/1368 (27%) | 1.67 | [1.32, 2.10] | < 0.001 | |
| 13 to 18 | 1334/3686 (36%) | 438/1334 (33%) | 2.10 | [1.66, 2.67] | < 0.001 | |
| School cluster | 1 | 1355/3686 (37%) | 287/1355 (21%) | Reference | - | - |
| 2 | 486/3686 (13%) | 159/486 (33%) | 2.28 | [0.646, 8.08] | 0.2 | |
| 3 | 1230/3686 (33%) | 294/1230 (24%) | 1.26 | [0.487, 3.26] | 0.6 | |
| 4 | 615/3686 (17%) | 279/615 (45%) | 3.65 | [1.14, 11.7] | 0.03 | |
Fixed effects from the mixed-effects logistic regression for wasting.
This model used data from the 3,686 students between the ages of 5 and 18 years, and with complete data for the included variables. Of these 3,686 students, 531 (14%) were stunted. The variance (in the logit scale) of the random intercept for school in this model was 0.381.
| Prevalence of this risk factor | Prevalence of wasting in participants with this risk factor | Adjusted odds ratio | 95% Confidence interval | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hookworm infection | Negative | 3007/3686 (82%) | 443/3007 (15%) | Reference | - | - |
| Positive | 679/3686 (18%) | 88/679 (13%) | 0.969 | [0.722, 1.30] | 0.8 | |
| Gender | Female | 1754/3686 (48%) | 206/1754 (12%) | Reference | - | - |
| Male | 1932/3686 (52%) | 325/1932 (17%) | 1.54 | [1.26, 1.87] | < 0.001 | |
| Age (years) | 5 to 10 | 984/3686 (27%) | 83/984 (8.4%) | Reference | - | - |
| 11 to 12 | 1368/3686 (37%) | 236/1368 (17%) | 2.13 | [1.61, 2.82] | < 0.001 | |
| 13 to 18 | 1334/3686 (36%) | 212/1334 (16%) | 2.00 | [1.49, 2.68] | < 0.001 | |
| School cluster | 1 | 1355/3686 (37%) | 255/1355 (19%) | Reference | - | - |
| 2 | 486/3686 (13%) | 69/486 (14%) | 0.727 | [0.332, 1.59] | 0.4 | |
| 3 | 1230/3686 (33%) | 133/1230 (11%) | 0.453 | [0.251, 0.818] | 0.009 | |
| 4 | 615/3686 (17%) | 74/615 (12%) | 0.526 | [0.255, 1.08] | 0.08 | |