Louise Arnold1, Paul G Cuddy, Susan B Hathaway, Jennifer L Quaintance, Steven L Kanter. 1. L. Arnold is professor emerita and previous associate dean for medical education and research, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri. P.G. Cuddy is professor, Department of Internal Medicine, and vice dean, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri. S.B. Hathaway is assistant teaching professor, Department of Pediatrics, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri. J.L. Quaintance is associate professor, Department of Biomedical and Health Informatics, and assistant dean for assessment and quality improvement, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri. S.L. Kanter is professor and dean, University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To identify medical school factors graduates in major leadership positions perceive as contributing to their leadership development. METHOD: Using a phenomenological, qualitative approach, in August-November 2015 the authors conducted semistructured interviews with 48 medical leaders who were 1976-1999 baccalaureate-MD graduates of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (UMKC). At UMKC, they participated in longitudinal learning communities, the centerpiece for learning professional values and behaviors plus clinical skills, knowledge, and judgment, but received no formal leadership instruction. The authors subjected interview comments to directed, largely qualitative content analysis with iterative coding cycles. RESULTS: Most graduates said their experiences and the people at UMKC positively influenced their leadership growth. Medical school factors that emerged as contributing to that growth were the longitudinal learning communities including docents, junior-senior partners, and team experiences; expectations set for students to achieve; a clinically oriented but integrated curriculum; admission policies seeking students with academic and nonacademic qualifications; supportive student-student and student-faculty relationships; and a positive overall learning environment. Graduates viewed a combination of factors as best preparing them for leadership and excellence in clinical medicine; together these factors enabled them to assume leadership opportunities after graduation. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds medical leaders' perspective to the leadership development literature and offers guidance from theory and practice for medical schools to consider in shaping leadership education: Namely, informal leadership preparation coupled with extensive longitudinal clinical education in a nurturing, authentic environment can develop students effectively for leadership in medicine.
PURPOSE: To identify medical school factors graduates in major leadership positions perceive as contributing to their leadership development. METHOD: Using a phenomenological, qualitative approach, in August-November 2015 the authors conducted semistructured interviews with 48 medical leaders who were 1976-1999 baccalaureate-MD graduates of the University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Medicine (UMKC). At UMKC, they participated in longitudinal learning communities, the centerpiece for learning professional values and behaviors plus clinical skills, knowledge, and judgment, but received no formal leadership instruction. The authors subjected interview comments to directed, largely qualitative content analysis with iterative coding cycles. RESULTS: Most graduates said their experiences and the people at UMKC positively influenced their leadership growth. Medical school factors that emerged as contributing to that growth were the longitudinal learning communities including docents, junior-senior partners, and team experiences; expectations set for students to achieve; a clinically oriented but integrated curriculum; admission policies seeking students with academic and nonacademic qualifications; supportive student-student and student-faculty relationships; and a positive overall learning environment. Graduates viewed a combination of factors as best preparing them for leadership and excellence in clinical medicine; together these factors enabled them to assume leadership opportunities after graduation. CONCLUSIONS: This study adds medical leaders' perspective to the leadership development literature and offers guidance from theory and practice for medical schools to consider in shaping leadership education: Namely, informal leadership preparation coupled with extensive longitudinal clinical education in a nurturing, authentic environment can develop students effectively for leadership in medicine.
Authors: Sarah Smithson; Gary Beck Dallaghan; Jason Crowner; Laura Trollinger Derry; Akshitha Ammu Vijayakumar; Mindy Storrie; Timothy P Daaleman Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2020-06-25
Authors: Robert Shochet; Amy Fleming; James Wagner; Jorie Colbert-Getz; Monica Bhutiani; Kevin Moynahan; Meg Keeley Journal: J Med Educ Curric Dev Date: 2019-03-24
Authors: Bruce L Henschen; Sara Shaunfield; Blair P Golden; Lauren A Gard; Jennifer Bierman; Daniel B Evans; Diane B Wayne; Elizabeth R Ryan; Monica Yang; Kenzie A Cameron Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2021-06-07 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Christopher D Stamy; Christine C Schwartz; Danielle A Phillips; Aparna S Ajjarapu; Kristi J Ferguson; Debra A Schwinn Journal: Adv Med Educ Pract Date: 2018-06-20