| Literature DB >> 34470623 |
Inês Fronteira1, Helga Freitas2, Nkanga Guimarães3, Mário Fresta4, Paulo Ferrinho5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Angola is among one of the most deprived countries in the world in terms of medical professionals. In the past decade, the Angolan Government has invested in the expansion of faculties of medicine in the country. We analysed the profiles of medical students in Angola according to four clusters of medical schools: older faculty in the country, private faculties, Cuban sponsored faculties and military faculty; under the assumption that the organizational culture of the different faculties might influence the expectations and decisions towards future professional life of medical students regarding where they want to work (community versus hospital) and in which sector (exclusively public versus not exclusively public).Entities:
Keywords: Angola; Medical students; Professional expectations; Profile
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34470623 PMCID: PMC8411538 DOI: 10.1186/s12909-021-02836-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Med Educ ISSN: 1472-6920 Impact factor: 2.463
Distribution of students per medical faculty and year of training
| Year of training | FM-UAN | FM-C | FM-D | FM-P | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5th | 0 | 26 14 % | 0 | 4 5 % | 30 8 % |
| 6th | 108 98 % | 154 86 % | 30 100,0 % | 66 86 % | 358 90 % |
| 7th | 2 2 % | 0 | 0 | 7 9 % | 9 2 % |
Distribution of socio-demographic characteristics of students per medical faculty
| Variables | FM-UAN | FM-C | FM-D | FM-P | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | Mean (sd) | 31.1 (7.1) | 28.6 (4.1) | 25.6 (1.5) | 28.4 (5.1) | < 0.01 |
| Gender | Female | 70 62 % | 108 91 % | 16 53 % | 56 72 % | < 0.01 |
| Male | 43 48 % | 11 12 % | 14 16 % | 22 24 % | ||
| Marital status | Single | 62 56 % | 18 64 % | 26 87 % | 63 81 % | 0.012 |
| Married | 47 42 % | 10 36 % | 4 13 % | 15 19 % | ||
| Separate/ Divorced | 1 1 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | ||
| Widowed | 1 1 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | ||
| Family | Urban | 63 58 % | 70 40 % | 12 42 % | 30 40 % | 0.04 |
| Rural | 4 4 % | 8 4 % | 3 10 % | 6 8 % | ||
| Mixed urban/ rural | 41 38 % | 98 56 % | 14 48 % | 40 52 % | ||
| Primary school education | Luanda | 7 63 % | 20 11 % | 14 47 % | 50 66 % | < 0.01 |
| Other provincial capital | 31 27 % | 127 72 % | 16 53 % | 15 20 % | ||
| Other place in Angola | 9 8 % | 30 17 % | 0 0 % | 4 5 % | ||
| Abroad | 2 2 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | 7 9 % | ||
| Secondary school education | Luanda | 78 68 % | 12 7 % | 14 47 % | 53 70 % | < 0.01 |
| Other provincial capital | 27 24 % | 144 82 % | 14 47 % | 12 16 % | ||
| Other place in Angola | 6 5 % | 20 11 % | 0 0 % | 3 4 % | ||
| Abroad | 3 3 % | 0 0 % | 0 0 % | 8 11 % | ||
Distribution of variables related with the decision to study medicine per type of faculty of medicine
| FM-UAN | FM-C | FM-D | FM-P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Family members in health professions (yes) | 66 59 % | 125 69 % | 12 40 % | 45 58 % | 0.01 | |
| This course was your first choice (yes) | 105 94 % | 168 93 % | 25 83 % | 71 91 % | 0.25 | |
| Would choose same course if could go back (yes) | 87 78 % | 177 98 % | 16 53 % | 64 83 % | < 0.01 | |
| Family’s influence on the choice of studying medicine | none | 36 33 % | 48 27 % | 7 25 % | 23 32 % | 0.44 |
| some | 29 26 % | 57 32 % | 12 43 % | 16 22 % | ||
| strong | 46 41 % | 72 41 % | 9 32 % | 33 46 % | ||
Future practice preferences of students
| FM-UAN | FM-C | FM-D | FM-P | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sector of preferred practice after completing training | public | 51 45 % | 112 64 % | 7 23 % | 34 45 % | < 0.01 |
| both or just private | 61 55 % | 64 36 % | 23 77 % | 41 55 % | ||
| Level of preferred practice after completing training | community | 15 14 % | 55 33 % | 4 14 % | 10 16 % | 0.01 |
| hospital | 91 86 % | 113 67 % | 25 86 % | 54 84 % | ||
| Place of preferred practice after completing training | Luanda | 83 76 % | 14 8 % | 19 64 % | 54 84 % | < 0.01 |
| Other provincial capital | 24 22 % | 142 82 % | 10 33 % | 15 21 % | ||
| Other locality | 2 2 % | 16 9 % | 1 3 % | 0 0 % | ||
| Abroad | 1 1 % | 1 1 % | 0 0 % | 3 4 % |
Determinants of preference for future community practice
| Variables | aOR | 95 % C.I. for aOR |
|---|---|---|
| Predominantly rural families (reference predominately urban) | 1.337 | [1.020;1.754] |
| Type of faculty (reference FM-P) | ||
| FM-UAN | 0.970 | [0.403;2.336] |
| FM-C | 2.494 | [1.171; 18.485] |
| FM-D | 0.635 | [0.160; 2.532] |
Determinants of preference for future public practice vs. not exclusively public practice
| aOR | 95 % C.I. for aOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Type of faculty (compared with FM-P) | ||
| FM-UAN | 0.795 | [0.427;1.481] |
| FM-C | 2.000 | [1.139;3.509] |
| FM-D | 0.430 | [0.162; 1.143] |
| Age (years) | 1.051 | [1.010; 1.100] |