Literature DB >> 28991387

Soft tissue rheology and its implications for elastography: Challenges and opportunities.

Lynne E Bilston1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance elastography and related shear wave ultrasound elastography techniques can be used to estimate the mechanical properties of soft tissues in vivo by using the relationships between wave propagation and the elastic properties of materials. These techniques have found numerous clinical and research applications, tracking changes in tissue properties as a result of disease or other interventions. Most dynamic elastography approaches estimate tissue elastic (or viscoelastic) properties from a simplified version of the equations for the propagation of acoustic waves through a homogeneous linear (visco)elastic medium. However, soft tissue rheology is complex and departs significantly from this idealized picture. In particular, soft tissues are nonlinearly viscoelastic, inhomogeneous and often anisotropic, and their apparent stiffness can vary with the current loading state. All of these features have implications for the reliability and reproducibility of elastography measurements, from data acquisition to analysis and interpretation. New developments in inversion algorithms for elastography are beginning to offer solutions to account for the complex rheology of tissues, including inhomogeneity and anisotropy. There remains considerable potential to further refine elastography to capture the full spectrum of tissue rheology, and thus to better understand the underlying tissue microstructural changes in a broad range of clinical disorders.
Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  magnetic resonance elastography; rheology; viscoelasticity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28991387     DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3832

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NMR Biomed        ISSN: 0952-3480            Impact factor:   4.044


  10 in total

1.  Towards a consensus on rheological models for elastography in soft tissues.

Authors:  K J Parker; T Szabo; S Holm
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Imaging brain function with simultaneous BOLD and viscoelasticity contrast: fMRI/fMRE.

Authors:  Patricia S Lan; Kevin J Glaser; Richard L Ehman; Gary H Glover
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 3.  Magnetic resonance elastography in normal pressure hydrocephalus-a scoping review.

Authors:  Jan Saip Aunan-Diop; Christian Bonde Pedersen; Bo Halle; Ulla Jensen; Sune Munthe; Fredrik Harbo; Bjarni Johannsson; Frantz Rom Poulsen
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-10-23       Impact factor: 2.800

Review 4.  Physics of Brain Cancer: Multiscale Alterations of Glioblastoma Cells under Extracellular Matrix Stiffening.

Authors:  Mohammad Khoonkari; Dong Liang; Marleen Kamperman; Frank A E Kruyt; Patrick van Rijn
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 6.525

5.  Magnetic resonance elastography of skeletal muscle deep tissue injury.

Authors:  Jules L Nelissen; Ralph Sinkus; Klaas Nicolay; Aart J Nederveen; Cees W J Oomens; Gustav J Strijkers
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 4.044

6.  Exploration of New Contrasts, Targets, and MR Imaging and Spectroscopy Techniques for Neuromuscular Disease - A Workshop Report of Working Group 3 of the Biomedicine and Molecular Biosciences COST Action BM1304 MYO-MRI.

Authors:  Gustav J Strijkers; Ericky C A Araujo; Noura Azzabou; David Bendahan; Andrew Blamire; Jedrek Burakiewicz; Pierre G Carlier; Bruce Damon; Xeni Deligianni; Martijn Froeling; Arend Heerschap; Kieren G Hollingsworth; Melissa T Hooijmans; Dimitrios C Karampinos; George Loudos; Guillaume Madelin; Benjamin Marty; Armin M Nagel; Aart J Nederveen; Jules L Nelissen; Francesco Santini; Olivier Scheidegger; Fritz Schick; Christopher Sinclair; Ralph Sinkus; Paulo L de Sousa; Volker Straub; Glenn Walter; Hermien E Kan
Journal:  J Neuromuscul Dis       Date:  2019

7.  Tissue Rheology as a Possible Complementary Procedure to Advance Histological Diagnosis of Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Deptuła; Dawid Łysik; Katarzyna Pogoda; Mateusz Cieśluk; Andrzej Namiot; Joanna Mystkowska; Grzegorz Król; Stanisław Głuszek; Paul A Janmey; Robert Bucki
Journal:  ACS Biomater Sci Eng       Date:  2020-09-07

8.  Fast acquisition of propagating waves in humans with low-field MRI: Toward accessible MR elastography.

Authors:  Maksym Yushchenko; Mathieu Sarracanie; Najat Salameh
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-09-09       Impact factor: 14.957

9.  Nanomechanical Hallmarks of Helicobacter pylori Infection in Pediatric Patients.

Authors:  Piotr Deptuła; Łukasz Suprewicz; Tamara Daniluk; Andrzej Namiot; Sylwia Joanna Chmielewska; Urszula Daniluk; Dariusz Lebensztejn; Robert Bucki
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Using rheology to quantify the effects of localized collagenase treatments on uterine fibroid digestion.

Authors:  Ria D Corder; Sashi V Gadi; Robert B Vachieri; Friederike L Jayes; John M Cullen; Saad A Khan; Darlene K Taylor
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2021-08-08       Impact factor: 10.633

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.