Yeonsu Song1,2, Susan M McCurry3, Constance H Fung1,2, Karen R Josephson4, Edmond Teng1,2, Michael R Irwin2,4, Cathy A Alessi1,2, Jennifer L Martin1,2. 1. a Geriatric Research, Education and Clinical Center , VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System , Los Angeles , California , USA. 2. b David Geffen School of Medicine , University of California , Los Angeles, Los Angeles , California , USA. 3. c Department of Psychosocial and Community Health , University of Washington, School of Nursing , Seattle , Washington , USA. 4. d Cousins Center for Psychoneuroimmunology , Semel Institute for Neuroscience and Human Behavior, University of California , Los Angeles , Los Angeles , California , USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This pilot study explored caregivers' attitudes toward core elements of a behavioral sleep intervention for managing sleep problems of older veteran care recipients and the caregivers, as an initial step for developing a dyadic sleep intervention program. METHODS: Five caregivers (all women; age range, 66-75 years) participated in a focus group discussion. Data were collected at one Veterans Affairs, adult day health care program. RESULTS: Caregivers' poor sleep was not necessarily explained by their caregiving responsibility. Caregivers felt that behavioral recommendations regarding sleep compression scheduling, increased indoor physical activity, and outdoor light exposure would be acceptable sleep interventions for themselves and the care recipients. Some challenges to the sleep recommendation were identified and they included limiting naptime of care recipients and change of their current sleep schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers are receptive to some key components of behavioral approaches to improving sleep. Tailored sleep recommendation strategy is needed to address potential challenges. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: If available within clinical care settings or delivered at the patient's home, caregivers of older veterans are likely to engage in behavioral sleep intervention programs.
OBJECTIVES: This pilot study explored caregivers' attitudes toward core elements of a behavioral sleep intervention for managing sleep problems of older veteran care recipients and the caregivers, as an initial step for developing a dyadic sleep intervention program. METHODS: Five caregivers (all women; age range, 66-75 years) participated in a focus group discussion. Data were collected at one Veterans Affairs, adult day health care program. RESULTS: Caregivers' poor sleep was not necessarily explained by their caregiving responsibility. Caregivers felt that behavioral recommendations regarding sleep compression scheduling, increased indoor physical activity, and outdoor light exposure would be acceptable sleep interventions for themselves and the care recipients. Some challenges to the sleep recommendation were identified and they included limiting naptime of care recipients and change of their current sleep schedule. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers are receptive to some key components of behavioral approaches to improving sleep. Tailored sleep recommendation strategy is needed to address potential challenges. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: If available within clinical care settings or delivered at the patient's home, caregivers of older veterans are likely to engage in behavioral sleep intervention programs.
Authors: Colleen E Carney; Daniel J Buysse; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Jack D Edinger; Andrew D Krystal; Kenneth L Lichstein; Charles M Morin Journal: Sleep Date: 2012-02-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Susan M McCurry; Kenneth C Pike; Michael V Vitiello; Rebecca G Logsdon; Eric B Larson; Linda Teri Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2011-07-28 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Susan M McCurry; Laura E Gibbons; Rebecca G Logsdon; Michael V Vitiello; Linda Teri Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Colin A Espie; Kenneth M A MacMahon; Heidi-Louise Kelly; Niall M Broomfield; Neil J Douglas; Heather M Engleman; Brian McKinstry; Charles M Morin; Andrew Walker; Philip Wilson Journal: Sleep Date: 2007-05 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Yeonsu Song; Susan M McCurry; Diane Lee; Karen R Josephson; Sarah Kate McGowan; Constance H Fung; Michael R Irwin; Edmond Teng; Cathy A Alessi; Jennifer L Martin Journal: Disabil Rehabil Date: 2019-10-26 Impact factor: 2.439