STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical significance of a new scale for measuring daytime fatigue associated with insomnia: The Flinders Fatigue Scale (FFS). METHODS: The 7-item FFS was used in two separate studies. Study 1 was an on-line validation study involving 1093 volunteers (mean [SD] age = 38.6 [14.7] y, 626 poor sleepers, 467 good sleepers) in a cross-sectional design; Study 2 investigated the clinical sensitivity of the FFS on 113 insomnia patients (mean [SD] age = 48.3 [15.0] y) in response to a 5-week cognitive-behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) program. RESULTS: The FFS had an internal consistency of 0.91; it comprised a single factor, accounting for 67% of the total variance. Poor sleepers in Study 1 scored significantly higher than good sleepers on the FFS (p < 0.0001). In Study 2, significant reductions in FFS scores were found in response to CBT-I (p < 0.0001). These reductions in fatigue correlated with improvements on subjective sleep parameters (all p < 0.0001). The FFS showed good discriminant validity with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The Flinders Fatigue Scale is a brief, clinically sensitive measure with strong psychometric properties.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the psychometric properties and clinical significance of a new scale for measuring daytime fatigue associated with insomnia: The Flinders Fatigue Scale (FFS). METHODS: The 7-item FFS was used in two separate studies. Study 1 was an on-line validation study involving 1093 volunteers (mean [SD] age = 38.6 [14.7] y, 626 poor sleepers, 467 good sleepers) in a cross-sectional design; Study 2 investigated the clinical sensitivity of the FFS on 113 insomniapatients (mean [SD] age = 48.3 [15.0] y) in response to a 5-week cognitive-behavior therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) program. RESULTS: The FFS had an internal consistency of 0.91; it comprised a single factor, accounting for 67% of the total variance. Poor sleepers in Study 1 scored significantly higher than good sleepers on the FFS (p < 0.0001). In Study 2, significant reductions in FFS scores were found in response to CBT-I (p < 0.0001). These reductions in fatigue correlated with improvements on subjective sleep parameters (all p < 0.0001). The FFS showed good discriminant validity with the Epworth Sleepiness Scale. CONCLUSIONS: The Flinders Fatigue Scale is a brief, clinically sensitive measure with strong psychometric properties.
Authors: Jamil L Hossain; Parvez Ahmad; Lawrence W Reinish; Leonid Kayumov; Naheed K Hossain; Colin M Shapiro Journal: J Sleep Res Date: 2005-09 Impact factor: 3.981
Authors: Colin M Shapiro; Margaret Flanigan; Jonathon A E Fleming; Rachel Morehouse; Adam Moscovitch; Jacques Plamondon; Lawrence Reinish; Gerald M Devins Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Susan M McCurry; Michael Von Korff; Charles M Morin; Amy Cunningham; Kenneth C Pike; Manu Thakral; Robert Wellman; Kai Yeung; Weiwei Zhu; Michael V Vitiello Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-10-13 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Michelle A Short; Michael Gradisar; Helen Wright; Leon C Lack; Hayley Dohnt; Mary A Carskadon Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-06-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Hsin-Yi Jean Tang; Susan M McCurry; Kenneth C Pike; Michael Von Korff; Michael V Vitiello Journal: J Psychosom Res Date: 2017-07-01 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Michael Gradisar; Hayley Dohnt; Greg Gardner; Sarah Paine; Karina Starkey; Annemarie Menne; Amy Slater; Helen Wright; Jennifer L Hudson; Edward Weaver; Sophie Trenowden Journal: Sleep Date: 2011-12-01 Impact factor: 5.849
Authors: Joshua Hyong-Jin Cho; Richard Olmstead; Hanbyul Choi; Carmen Carrillo; Teresa E Seeman; Michael R Irwin Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: Christopher B Miller; Delwyn J Bartlett; Anna E Mullins; Kirsty L Dodds; Christopher J Gordon; Simon D Kyle; Jong Won Kim; Angela L D'Rozario; Rico S C Lee; Maria Comas; Nathaniel S Marshall; Brendon J Yee; Colin A Espie; Ronald R Grunstein Journal: Sleep Date: 2016-11-01 Impact factor: 5.849