Literature DB >> 28990491

Young Athletes Cleared for Sports Participation After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: How Many Actually Meet Recommended Return-to-Sport Criterion Cutoffs?

Allison R Toole, Matthew P Ithurburn, Mitchell J Rauh, Timothy E Hewett, Mark V Paterno, Laura C Schmitt.   

Abstract

Study Design Prospective cohort study. Background While meeting objective criterion cutoffs is recommended prior to return to sports following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, the number of young athletes who meet recommended cutoffs and the impact of cutoffs on longitudinal sports participation are unknown. Objectives To test the hypothesis that a higher proportion of young athletes who meet recommended cutoffs will maintain the same level of sports participation over the year following return-to-sport clearance compared to those who do not meet recommended cutoffs. Methods At the time of return-to-sport clearance, the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form (IKDC), quadriceps and hamstring strength limb symmetry index (LSI), and single-leg hop test LSI were assessed. Proportions of participants who met individual (IKDC score of 90 or greater; strength and hop test LSIs of 90% or greater) and combined cutoffs were calculated. Proportions of participants who continued at the same level of sports participation over the year following return-to-sport clearance (assessed using the Tegner activity scale) were compared between those who met and did not meet cutoffs. Results Participants included 115 young athletes (88 female). The proportions meeting individual cutoffs ranged from 43.5% to 78.3%. The proportions meeting cutoffs for all hop tests, all strength tests, and all combined measures were 53.0%, 27.8%, and 13.9%, respectively. A higher proportion of participants who met cutoffs for both strength tests maintained the same level of sports participation over the year following return-to-sport clearance than those who did not (81.3% versus 60.2%, P = .02). Conclusion The proportions of young athletes after ACL reconstruction recently cleared for return to sports who met the combined criterion cutoffs were low. Those who met the criterion cutoffs for both strength tests maintained the same level of sports participation at higher proportions than those who did not. Level of Evidence Prognosis, level 2b. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2017;47(11):825-833. Epub 7 Oct 2017. doi:10.2519/jospt.2017.7227.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL; athletic performance; knee injury; limb symmetry; rehabilitation; return to sports

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28990491     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.2017.7227

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  51 in total

1.  The effect of experimental shoulder pain on contralateral muscle force and activation.

Authors:  Scott K Stackhouse; Brett A Sweitzer; Philip W McClure
Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 2.279

2.  The relationship between frontal plane trunk control during landing and lower extremity muscle strength in young athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Conor Fryer; Matthew P Ithurburn; Michael P McNally; Staci Thomas; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Demographic and surgical factors affect quadriceps strength after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Christopher Kuenze; Brian Pietrosimone; Caroline Lisee; Margaret Rutherford; Tom Birchmeier; Adam Lepley; Joseph Hart
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  What is the Evidence for and Validity of Return-to-Sport Testing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Kate E Webster; Timothy E Hewett
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Strength and Function Across Maturational Levels in Young Athletes at the Time of Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction.

Authors:  Matthew P Ithurburn; Adam Paljieg; Staci Thomas; Timothy E Hewett; Mark V Paterno; Laura C Schmitt
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019-06-07       Impact factor: 3.843

6.  Association between Functional Performance and Return to Performance in High-Impact Sports after Lower Extremity Injury: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Astrid Vereijken; Inne Aerts; Jorrit Jetten; Bruno Tassignon; Jo Verschueren; Romain Meeusen; Emiel van Trijffel
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Clinical Decision Algorithm Associated With Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Thamlya Rocha Albano; Carlos Augusto Silva Rodrigues; Antonio Kayro Pereira Melo; Pedro Olavo de Paula; Gabriel Peixoto Leão Almeida
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.860

8.  A NOVEL TEST TO ASSESS CHANGE OF DIRECTION: DEVELOPMENT, RELIABILITY, AND REHABILITATION CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Haley Worst; Nancy Henderson; Ryan Decarreau; George Davies
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04

9.  CRITERIA-BASED RETURN TO SPRINTING PROGRESSION FOLLOWING LOWER EXTREMITY INJURY.

Authors:  Daniel Lorenz; Steve Domzalski
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2020-04

10.  COMPARISON OF THE 'BACK IN ACTION' TEST BATTERY TO STANDARD HOP TESTS AND ISOKINETIC KNEE DYNAMOMETRY IN PATIENTS FOLLOWING ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION.

Authors:  Jay R Ebert; Peter Edwards; Justine Currie; Anne Smith; Brendan Joss; Timothy Ackland; Jens-Ulrich Buelow; Ben Hewitt
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2018-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.