Literature DB >> 31173697

Strength and Function Across Maturational Levels in Young Athletes at the Time of Return to Sport After ACL Reconstruction.

Matthew P Ithurburn1, Adam Paljieg2, Staci Thomas3, Timothy E Hewett4, Mark V Paterno3,5,6, Laura C Schmitt7,8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The impact of maturation on lower extremity strength and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may help guide future studies of age-specific rehabilitation. HYPOTHESIS: Pediatric ACLR patients would demonstrate higher thigh strength symmetry and knee-related function at return to sport (RTS) compared with adolescent and young adult participants who underwent traditional ACLR. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
METHODS: A total of 144 young athletes at the time of RTS clearance post-ACLR were classified into 3 maturational groups (pediatric, n = 16 with physeal-sparing ACLR [mean age = 12.3 years; range = 9.2-14.6 years]; adolescent, n = 113 [mean age = 16.5 years; range = 14.1-19.8 years]; young adult, n = 15 [mean age = 22.0 years; range = 20.5-24.9 years]). Quadriceps and hamstring strength were measured using an electromechanical dynamometer. Knee-related function was measured using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective form and single-leg hop tests. The Limb symmetry Index (LSI) was used in calculations for hop and strength tests. Group differences were compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests and Mann-Whitney U post hoc tests. Proportions of participants meeting literature-recommended RTS criterion cutoffs were compared among the groups using chi-square tests.
RESULTS: The pediatric group demonstrated higher quadriceps LSI (P = 0.01), IKDC scores (P < 0.01), single-hop LSI (P < 0.01), and crossover-hop LSI (P = 0.02) compared with the young adult group. In addition, the pediatric group demonstrated higher IKDC scores (P < 0.01) and single-hop LSI (P = 0.02) compared with the adolescent group. The adolescent group demonstrated higher IKDC scores (P < 0.01), single-hop LSI (P = 0.02), and crossover-hop LSI (P = 0.03) compared with the young adult group. The proportions of participants meeting all RTS criterion cutoffs were highest in the pediatric group and lowest in the young adult group (P = 0.03).
CONCLUSION: Young athletes at RTS clearance after pediatric ACLR demonstrated higher quadriceps strength symmetry and knee-related function than adolescents and young adults after traditional ACLR. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These findings demonstrate the need for further study regarding the impact of these group differences on longitudinal outcomes after ACLR, including successful RTS and risk of second ACL injury.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACL reconstruction; maturation; outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31173697      PMCID: PMC6600581          DOI: 10.1177/1941738119849070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sports Health        ISSN: 1941-0921            Impact factor:   3.843


  55 in total

1.  A modified neuromuscular electrical stimulation protocol for quadriceps strength training following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  G Kelley Fitzgerald; Sara R Piva; James J Irrgang
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 2.  Hop tests as predictors of dynamic knee stability.

Authors:  G K Fitzgerald; S M Lephart; J H Hwang; R S Wainner
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 4.751

3.  Interrater reliability of isokinetic measures of knee flexion and extension.

Authors:  D R Keskula; J S Dowling; V L Davis; P W Finley; D L Dell'omo
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.860

4.  Test-retest reliability of reciprocal isokinetic knee extension and flexion peak torque measurements.

Authors:  R W McCleary; J C Andersen
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.860

5.  Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form.

Authors:  J J Irrgang; A F Anderson; A L Boland; C D Harner; M Kurosaka; P Neyret; J C Richmond; K D Shelborne
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.202

Review 6.  Associated injuries in pediatric and adolescent anterior cruciate ligament tears: does a delay in treatment increase the risk of meniscal tear?

Authors:  Peter J Millett; Andrew A Willis; Russell F Warren
Journal:  Arthroscopy       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.772

7.  Dynamic stability after ACL injury: who can hop?

Authors:  K S Rudolph; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  The natural history and treatment of rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. A prospective review.

Authors:  P M Aichroth; D V Patel; P Zorrilla
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  2002-01

9.  Anterior cruciate ligament replacement: comparison of bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts with two-strand hamstring grafts. A prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Bruce D Beynnon; Robert J Johnson; Braden C Fleming; Pekka Kannus; Michael Kaplan; John Samani; Per Renström
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation.

Authors:  Joanna Kvist
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 11.136

View more
  8 in total

1.  Making Progress.

Authors:  Edward M Wojtys
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2019 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 2.  Paediatric Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Injuries: Current Concepts Review.

Authors:  Mandeep Singh Dhillon; Karthick Rangasamy; Rajesh Kumar Rajnish; Nirmal Raj Gopinathan
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 1.033

3.  Adolescent Athletes Demonstrate Inferior Objective Profiles at the Time of Return to Sport After ACLR Compared With Healthy Controls.

Authors:  John D Robinson; Joseph Hannon; Shiho Goto; Steven B Singleton; J Craig Garrison
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-01-18

4.  Return to School After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Prospective Study of Adolescents and Young Adults.

Authors:  Joseph M Brutico; Ryan W Paul; Margaret L Wright; Steven B Cohen; Michael G Ciccotti; Christopher C Dodson; Kevin B Freedman; Sommer Hammoud
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-23

5.  Unique Considerations for the Pediatric Athlete During Rehabilitation and Return to Sport After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Yukiko Matsuzaki; Danielle E Chipman; Sofia Hidalgo Perea; Daniel W Green
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-01-28

6.  Outcomes, Including Graft Tears, Contralateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tears, and All-Cause Ipsilateral Knee Operations, are Similar for Adult-type, Transphyseal, and Partial Transphyseal Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Hamstring Autograft in Pediatric and Adolescent Patients.

Authors:  Sachin Allahabadi; Ashish Mittal; Monica J Coughlan; Arin E Kim; Nicole J Hung; Nirav K Pandya
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2022-07-11

7.  Uninjured Youth Athlete Performance on Single-Leg Hop Testing: How Many Can Achieve Recommended Return-to-Sport Criterion?

Authors:  Elliot M Greenberg; Julie Dyke; Anne Leung; Michael Karl; J Todd Lawrence; Theodore Ganley
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 3.843

8.  Isokinetic Strength After ACL Reconstruction: Influence of Concomitant Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Benoit Gillet; Yoann Blache; Isabelle Rogowski; Grégory Vigne; Olivier Capel; Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet; Jean-Marie Fayard; Mathieu Thaunat
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2021-04-02       Impact factor: 3.843

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.