Literature DB >> 28989842

Complications Associated With Spine Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years or Older: Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA) Multicenter Study.

Kazuyoshi Kobayashi1, Shiro Imagama1, Kei Ando1, Naoki Ishiguro1, Masaomi Yamashita2, Yawara Eguchi3, Morio Matsumoto4, Ken Ishii4, Tomohiro Hikata4, Shoji Seki5, Hidetomi Terai6, Akinobu Suzuki6, Koji Tamai6, Masaaki Aramomi7, Tetsuhiro Ishikawa7, Atsushi Kimura8, Hirokazu Inoue8, Gen Inoue9, Masayuki Miyagi9, Wataru Saito9, Kei Yamada10, Michio Hongo11, Hirosuke Nishimura12, Hidekazu Suzuki12, Atsushi Nakano13, Kazuyuki Watanabe14, Hirotaka Chikuda15, Junichi Ohya15, Yasuchika Aoki16, Masayuki Shimizu17, Toshimasa Futatsugi17, Keijiro Mukaiyama17, Masaichi Hasegawa18, Katsuhito Kiyasu19, Haku Iizuka20, Yoichi Iizuka20, Ryoichi Kobayashi20, Kotaro Nishida21, Kenichiro Kakutani21, Hideaki Nakajima22, Hideki Murakami23, Satoru Demura23, Satoshi Kato23, Katsuhito Yoshioka23, Takashi Namikawa24, Kei Watanabe25,26, Kazuyoshi Nakanishi27, Yukihiro Nakagawa28, Mitsunori Yoshimoto29, Hiroyasu Fujiwara30, Norihiro Nishida31, Yasuaki Imajo31, Masashi Yamazaki32, Masataka Sakane32, Tetsuya Abe32, Kengo Fujii32, Takashi Kaito33, Takeo Furuya34, Sumihisa Orita34, Seiji Ohtori34.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Retrospective study of registry data.
OBJECTIVES: Aging of society and recent advances in surgical techniques and general anesthesia have increased the demand for spinal surgery in elderly patients. Many complications have been described in elderly patients, but a multicenter study of perioperative complications in spinal surgery in patients aged 80 years or older has not been reported. Therefore, the goal of the study was to analyze complications associated with spine surgery in patients aged 80 years or older with cervical, thoracic, or lumbar lesions.
METHODS: A multicenter study was performed in patients aged 80 years or older who underwent 262 spinal surgeries at 35 facilities. The frequency and severity of complications were examined for perioperative complications, including intraoperative and postoperative complications, and for major postoperative complications that were potentially life threatening, required reoperation in the perioperative period, or left a permanent injury.
RESULTS: Perioperative complications occurred in 75 of the 262 surgeries (29%) and 33 were major complications (13%). In multivariate logistic regression, age over 85 years (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.007, P = 0.025) and estimated blood loss ≥500 g (HR = 3.076, P = .004) were significantly associated with perioperative complications, and an operative time ≥180 min (HR = 2.78, P = .007) was significantly associated with major complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients aged 80 years or older with comorbidities are at higher risk for complications. Increased surgical invasion, and particularly a long operative time, can cause serious complications that may be life threatening. Therefore, careful decisions are required with regard to the surgical indication and procedure in elderly patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  complications; elderly; risk factor; spine surgery

Year:  2017        PMID: 28989842      PMCID: PMC5624380          DOI: 10.1177/2192568217716144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Global Spine J        ISSN: 2192-5682


Introduction

Aging of society and recent advances in surgical techniques and general anesthesia have increased the demand for spinal surgery in elderly patients. However, many perioperative complications occur in these patients. Some studies have indicated a concern of increased morbidity and have cautioned against spinal surgery in the elderly,[1-5] whereas others have reported low complication rates in this population and provided support for spinal surgery.[6-8] In general, the term “elderly” is accepted to mean age ≥65 years,[9-11] but with rapid aging of society, extremely elderly patients aged over 80 years now undergo spinal surgery,[12-15] mostly for lumbar lesions. However, a multicenter study of perioperative complications has not been reported in such patients, including those with cervical, thoracic, and lumbar lesions. Complications range from mild to severe, and many are resolved by appropriate treatment without leaving sequelae, but some are life threatening, Thus, in this study, we classified complications as those that required reoperation or left permanent injury as major complications, and all perioperative complications, including those that did not significantly alter the course of treatment, as minor complications. All perioperative complications in all lesions for patients older than 80 years were identified through a retrospective review of a multicenter database. The frequency and severity of complications were analyzed and the risk for complications was examined using patient-specific and surgical factors.

Methods

Demographic Data

The study was performed by JASA (Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition) using a retrospective analysis of patients aged ≥80 years treated with spinal surgery at 35 facilities in 2014. The surgery data was included for the period from January 2010 to December 2013. A total of 262 such patients were identified, including 122 males and 140 females. The characteristics of the patients are shown in Table 1. Age ranged from 80 to 91 years, with a mean of 83 years (Figure 1). Lesions were cervical in 74 patients (28%), thoracic in 13 (5%), and lumbar in 175 (67%) (Table 2). Diagnoses included lumbar spinal canal stenosis (LSCS) due to spondylosis in 132 patients, cervical spondylotic myelopathy in 56, LSCS due to spondylolisthesis in 21, thoracic-lumbar compression fracture in 19, cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) in 6, pyogenic spondylitis in 5, and others in 23 (Table 2). The average length of hospital stay (LOS) was 38 ± 19 days. The mean operative time was 171 minutes, mean estimated blood loss (EBL) was 289 mL, and 87 patients underwent fusion surgeries with instrumentation (Table 1). The institutional review board approved the study.
Table 1.

Characteristics of the 262 Cases.

ItemValue (Range)
Demographic
 Age (years)83 (80-91)
 Sex, male/female (n/n)122/140
 Previous spinal surgery (n)47
 Body mass index (kg/m2)23.3 (14-33)
 Disease duration (years)3.6 (0.1-55)
 Smoking status (n)4
Drug use
 Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)122
 Opioids18
 Osteoporosis agents68
 Anticoagulants58
Comorbidity
 Hypertension107
 Preexisting neoplasm45
 Diabetes40
 Cerebrovascular disease20
Operative factor
 Operative time (minutes)171 (34-615)
 Estimated blood loss (mL)289 (5-6500)
 Fusion with instrumentation (n)87
Figure 1.

Bar graph showing the population stratified by age.

Table 2.

Diseases and Lesions in 262 Cases.

Disease and surgical lesionn (%)
LSCS (lumbar spondylosis)132 (50)
Cervical spondylotic myelopathy56 (21)
LSCS (spondylolisthesis)21 (8)
Thoracic-lumbar compression fracture19 (75)
Cervical OPLL6 (2)
Pyogenic spondylitis5 (2)
Others23 (9)
 Cervical74 (28)
 Thoracic13 (5)
 Lumbar175 (67)

Abbreviations: LSCS, lumbar spinal canal stenosis; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Characteristics of the 262 Cases. Bar graph showing the population stratified by age. Diseases and Lesions in 262 Cases. Abbreviations: LSCS, lumbar spinal canal stenosis; OPLL, ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Definitions of Risk Factors and Medical Comorbidities

The risk for postoperative complications was examined by comparing background factors in patients with and without complications using univariate and multivariate analysis. These factors included age, gender, previous spinal surgery (resurgery at the same index level), body mass index (BMI), disease duration, smoking status, drug use (nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs], opioids, osteoporosis agents, and anticoagulants), comorbidities (hypertension, preexisting neoplasm, diabetes, and cerebrovascular disease), and operative factors (operative time, EBL, and fusion with instrumentation).

Outcome Variables

Two types of complications were defined—those related to surgery and all postoperative major and minor complications, which were collectively defined as perioperative complications; and postoperative major complications only. Major complications were defined as those that were potentially life threatening, required reoperation in the perioperative period, or left a permanent injury. These included cardiac, urinary, renal, and wound-related complications, and hemorrhage or hematoma complicating a procedure. Minor complications were those events that required additional intervention, but did not significantly alter the course of treatment.[16] A simple questionnaire was given to all patients after hospital discharge to examine patient satisfaction after surgery, using a 5-point scale: 1 = not satisfied at all, 2 = not much satisfaction, 3 = neither satisfied nor dissatisfied, 4 = some satisfaction, and 5 = major satisfaction.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were calculated for demographic variables. Differences between 2 groups were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U test or Student’s t test, and those between 3 groups by Kruskal-Wallis test. A multivariable logistic regression model was constructed for multivariate analysis using variables with P < .05 in univariate analysis. Multivariate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) are reported. All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 22 for Windows (IBM, Armonk, NY). P < .05 was considered to be significant in all analyses.

Results

Perioperative complications, including major and minor complications, occurred in 75 of the 262 cases (29%). These included 16 intraoperative and 59 postoperative complications. The 5 common perioperative complication were delirium, screw malposition, epidural hemorrhage, surgical site infection (SSI), and urinary infection (Table 3). There were 33 major complications (13%) that were potentially life threatening, required reoperation, or required an extended hospitalization period, with the 3 most common being epidural hemorrhage, SSI, and urinary infection (Table 3). There was no perioperative mortality. The rates of complications for cervical and thoracic lesion were higher than that for lumbar lesions, but the incidence for each lesion did not differ significantly (Table 4). All complications occurred during the period of initial hospitalization, and there were no readmission cases. The LOSs were 36 ± 19 days without complication, 38 ± 20 days with complication, and 48 ± 17 days with major complication, with a significant difference between the patients with major complications compared with the other 2 groups (P < .01). For patient satisfaction after surgery, the rates of scores 4 or 5 (indicating satisfaction) were 55% (41/75) in the complication group and 89% (166/187) in the no complication group, with a significant difference between these groups (P < .01).
Table 3.

Details of Perioperative Complications (n = 75) and Major Complications (n = 33).

ComplicationNo. of Cases
Intraoperative complication (n = 16)
 Screw malposition8
 Dural tear5
 Root injury2
 Peritoneal injury1
Postoperative complication (n = 59)
 Delirium15
 Epidural hemorrhagea 7
 Surgical site infectiona 7
 Urinary infectiona 6
 Cerebral infarctiona 3
 Transient muscle weakness3
 Renal dysfunctiona 2
 C5 palsy2
 Systemic edemaa 2
 Liver dysfunctiona 2
 Respiration disordera 2
 Acute myocardial infarctiona 1
 Drug rash1
 Arrhythmia1
 Anginaa 1
 Hypotension1
 Infected with flu virus1
 Crural neuralgia1
 Adjacent vertebral fracture1

aIndicates a major complication (n=33).

Table 4.

Relationships Between Surgical Lesions and Complications.

Surgical LesionPerioperative Complications (n = 75)Major Complications (n = 33)
PatientsRate (%) P PatientsRate (%) P
Cervical2435n.s.1217n.s.
Thoracic643 214
Lumbar4525 1911

Abbreviation: n.s., not significant.

Details of Perioperative Complications (n = 75) and Major Complications (n = 33). aIndicates a major complication (n=33). Relationships Between Surgical Lesions and Complications. Abbreviation: n.s., not significant. The results of univariate and multivariate analyses are shown in Tables 5 and 6, respectively. In univariate analysis, age >85 years (P = .027), cerebrovascular disease (P = .018), longer operation time (P = .046), and greater EBL ≥500 g (P = .001) were significantly related to all perioperative complications (Table 5); and anticoagulant use (P = .028), diabetes (P = .026), and operative time >180 minutes (P = .015) were significantly related to major complications (Table 5). In multivariate logistic regression, age >85 years (HR = 1.007, 95% CI = 1.001-1.009; P = .025) and EBL ≥500 g (HR = 3.076, 95% CI = 1.425-6.641; P = .004) were significantly associated with perioperative complications; and operative time >180 minutes (HR = 2.78, 95% CI = 1.317-5.917; P = .007) was significantly associated with major complications (Table 6).
Table 5.

Univariate Analysis of Risk for Perioperative and Major Complication (n = 75).

Perioperative Complication (n = 75)Major Complication (n = 33)
VariableHR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Demographic
 >85 years of age1.159 (1.017-1.320).027a 1.153 (0.974-1.366).099
 Female0.848 (0.428-1.679).6360.783 (0.316-1.939).597
 Previous spinal surgery0.913 (0.397-2.096).8290.942 (0.324-2.736).912
 Body mass index1.006 (0.946-1.070).8540.952 (0.883-1.026).198
 Disease duration1.008 (0.945-1.074).8160.991 (0.892-1.100).858
 Smoking status0.624 (0.048-8.113).7190.345 (0.019-6.271).472
Drug use
 NSAIDs0.732 (0.384-1.396).3430.662 (0.281-1.560).345
 Opioids0.852 (0.233-3.116).8080.283 (0.069-1159).079
 Osteoporosis agents0.553 (0.258-1.183).1270.956 (0.358-2.551).928
 Anti-coagulants2.138 (0.910-5.020).0814.338 (1.173-16.035).028a
Comorbidity
 Hypertension1.025 (0.540-1.948).9391.028 (0.437-2.421).950
 Preexisting neoplasm0.605 (0.270-1.354).2210.545 (0.192-1.548).254
 Diabetes0.463 (0.198-1.082).0763.246 (1.149-9.174).026a
 Cerebrovascular disease0.258 (0.084-1.082).018a 0.334 (0.086-1.299).113
Intraoperative factor
 Operative time (≥180 min)1.005 (1.000-1.009).046a 4.329 (1.329-14.08).015a
 Estimated blood loss (≥500 g)5.029 (2.438-10.18).001a 1.599 (0.642-3.982).313
 Use instrumentation0.783 (0.355-1.725).5440.397 (0.128-1.001).109

Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

aIndicates significant difference (P < .05).

Table 6.

Multivariate Analysis of Risk for Perioperative and Major Complication (n = 33).

Perioperative Complication (n = 75)Major Complication (n = 33)
VariableHR (95% CI) P HR (95% CI) P
Demographic
 >85 years of age1.007 (1.001-1.009).025a
Intraoperative factor
 Operative time (≥180 min) 2.780 (1.317-5.917).007a
 Estimated blood loss (≥500 g)3.076 (1.425-6.641).004a

Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio.

aIndicates significant difference (P < .05).

Univariate Analysis of Risk for Perioperative and Major Complication (n = 75). Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; NSAIDs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. aIndicates significant difference (P < .05). Multivariate Analysis of Risk for Perioperative and Major Complication (n = 33). Abbreviation: HR, hazard ratio. aIndicates significant difference (P < .05).

Discussion

Demographic data indicates that there are 9.3 million people in Japan who are more than 80 years old, equivalent to 7.3% of the total population, and this cohort is projected to increase to 14.5% by 2035.[17] In ultra-aging countries, the demand for spinal surgery in elderly patients has grown in recent years.[14,15] Complications in lumbar surgeries for patients over 65 years of age have been reported to occur at rates of 3% to 29%,[1,2,4,6,18-21] and older age, comorbidities, blood loss, operative time, and number of levels increase the rate of complications.[1,3,15,22] For patients over 80 years of age, 2 studies of lumbar surgeries have found complication rates of 20% with a relationship with length of intensive care unit stay.[23] In 26% of lumbar decompression cases in patients aged over 80 years, a general state of mental confusion was observed after surgery for several days, but was fully reversible, and there was no permanent morbidity or perioperative death.[24] These studies focused on lumbar surgeries, and there has been no multicenter study in extremely elderly patients after cervical and thoracic surgeries. In our series with all lesions, the rates were 29% for perioperative complications and 13% for major complications, similar to previous reports of lumbar surgeries. In a Japanese multicenter study, Yone at al[8] found a complication rate of 10.4% in patients with a mean age of 59.3 years in more than 30 000 spinal surgeries. In comparison, extremely elderly patients over 80 years are at higher risk for complications, with the rate increased by 2.7 times compared with patients of all ages. In our series, this could be a reason for the relatively low patient satisfaction postoperatively. We classified complications into minor and major events. Minor perioperative complications were included because it is important for doctors to recognize all adverse events after surgery to avoid more serious problems in the postoperative course and prevent major complications. This is likely to lead to an improved outcome and patient satisfaction. Major complications were defined as those that were potentially life threatening, required reoperation in the perioperative period or left a permanent injury. Perioperative death was also included, but there were no such cases in our series. Among postoperative complications, delirium was the most common, and had features of acute onset and a fluctuating course, inattention, and disorganized thinking in our series. Postoperative delirium is common in extremely elderly patients and is associated with a significant increase in mortality, complications, length of hospital stay, and admission to a long-term care facility.[25] In patients older than 70 years, 20% may develop postoperative delirium.[26] Cerebrovascular disease was also a significant perioperative complication, and it has been reported that this condition has a strong association with postoperative delirium.[27] Risk factors for perioperative complications were age >85 years (HR = 1.007) and EBL ≥500 g (HR = 3.076), and that for major complications was operative time ≥180 minutes (HR = 2.78). Surgical invasion such as operative time and EBL have previously been shown to be significant risk factors,[4,5,11,26] but HRs were not determined. Thus, to prevent these complications, care is required regarding the surgical extent, indication, and procedure, including the invasiveness of surgery, such as use of instrumentation. If instrumentation is used, the fixation range should be carefully determined in extremely elderly patients. This study has the limitation of a retrospective design based on data review, which did not allow evaluation of preoperative severity and detailed evaluation of postoperative course. Despite this limitation, the results provide important estimates of inpatient morbidity and mortality after spinal surgery in extremely elderly patients.

Conclusions

Perioperative and major complications after spine surgery in the extremely elderly occurred at rates of 29% and 13%, respectively, in our patients. Increased surgical invasion, and especially an operative time of more than 3 hours, was a strong risk factor for potentially life-threatening complications. Therefore, for extremely elderly patients, particular care is required in the choice of the surgical procedure.
  22 in total

1.  Perioperative complications of posterior lumbar decompression and arthrodesis in older adults.

Authors:  Leah Y Carreon; Rolando M Puno; John R Dimar; Steven D Glassman; John R Johnson
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  The outcome of decompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis.

Authors:  J N Katz; S J Lipson; M G Larson; J M McInnes; A H Fossel; M H Liang
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Predicting morbidity and mortality of lumbar spine arthrodesis in patients in their ninth decade.

Authors:  Christopher S Raffo; William C Lauerman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-01-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Lumbar surgery in the elderly.

Authors:  M R Quigley; R Kortyna; C Goodwin; J C Maroon
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 4.654

5.  Perioperative complications and adverse events after lumbar spinal surgery: evaluation of 1012 operations at a single center.

Authors:  Shiro Imagama; Noriaki Kawakami; Taichi Tsuji; Tetsuya Ohara; Yuji Matsubara; Tokumi Kanemura; Manabu Goto; Yoshito Katayama; Naoki Ishiguro
Journal:  J Orthop Sci       Date:  2011-07-02       Impact factor: 1.601

6.  Complications associated with lumbar stenosis surgery in patients older than 75 years of age.

Authors:  Michael Y Wang; Barth A Green; Sachin Shah; Steven Vanni; Allan D O Levi
Journal:  Neurosurg Focus       Date:  2003-02-15       Impact factor: 4.047

7.  Long-term outcome of laminectomy for spinal stenosis in octogenarians.

Authors:  Klaus Galiano; Alois Albert Obwegeser; Michael Viktor Gabl; Richard Bauer; Klaus Twerdy
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Minimally invasive lumbar spinal decompression in the elderly: outcomes of 50 patients aged 75 years and older.

Authors:  David S Rosen; John E O'Toole; Kurt M Eichholz; Melody Hrubes; Dezheng Huo; Faheem A Sandhu; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Outpatient lumbar spine decompression in 233 patients 65 years of age or older.

Authors:  Natalie M Best; Rick C Sasso
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Perioperative complications of lumbar instrumentation and fusion in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Steven D Glassman; Gary Alegre; Leah Carreon; John R Dimar; John R Johnson
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.166

View more
  12 in total

Review 1.  Aortic injury in spine surgery……What a spine surgeon needs to know.

Authors:  Safwan Alomari; Ryan Planchard; Sheng-Fu Larry Lo; Timothy Witham; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 3.042

2.  Laser-assisted endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy for failed back surgery syndrome in elderly patients.

Authors:  Yong Ahn; Han Joong Keum; Sang Ha Shin; Jung Ju Choi
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Epidemiological trends in spine surgery over 10 years in a multicenter database.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Yoshihiro Nishida; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Reply Letter to "Cervical Facet Joint Degeneration".

Authors:  Yasuhiro Takeshima; Ai Okamoto; Shohei Yokoyama; Fumihiko Nishimura; Ichiro Nakagawa; Young-Soo Park; Hiroyuki Nakase
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2022-09-30

5.  The impact of frailty on postoperative complications in geriatric patients undergoing multi-level lumbar fusion surgery.

Authors:  Andy Ton; Shane Shahrestani; Nima Saboori; Alexander M Ballatori; Xiao T Chen; Jeffrey C Wang; Zorica Buser
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 2.721

6.  Analysis of Postoperative Complications in Spinal Surgery, Hospital Length of Stay, and Unplanned Readmission: Application of Dindo-Clavien Classification to Spine Surgery.

Authors:  Gaston Camino Willhuber; Cristina Elizondo; Pablo Slullitel
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-07-26

7.  Predictors of Prolonged Length of Stay After Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Fumihiko Kato; Tokumi Kanemura; Koji Sato; Yudo Hachiya; Yuji Matsubara; Mitsuhiro Kamiya; Yoshihito Sakai; Hideki Yagi; Ryuichi Shinjo; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2018-09-13

8.  Preoperative Narcotic Use, Impaired Ambulation Status, and Increased Intraoperative Blood Loss Are Independent Risk Factors for Complications Following Posterior Cervical Laminectomy and Fusion Surgery.

Authors:  Ryan K Badiee; Andrew K Chan; Joshua Rivera; Annette Molinaro; Brianna R Doherty; K Daniel Riew; Dean Chou; Praveen V Mummaneni; Lee A Tan
Journal:  Neurospine       Date:  2019-09-30

9.  Spinal Surgery in Patients Aged 80 Years and Older: Risk Stratification Using the Modified Frailty Index.

Authors:  Barry Kweh; Hui Lee; Terence Tan; Tom O'Donohoe; Joseph Mathew; Mark Fitzgerald; Dashiell Gantner; Tony Kambourakis; Kim Tew; Martin Hunn; Jeffrey Rosenfeld; Jin Tee
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2020-03-30

10.  Medical clerks in a national university hospital: improving the quality of medical care with a focus on spinal surgery.

Authors:  Kazuyoshi Kobayashi; Kei Ando; Makiko Noda; Naoki Ishiguro; Shiro Imagama
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.131

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.