| Literature DB >> 28989766 |
Andrew R Thompson1, Dustin C Chen2, Lian W Guo3, John R Hyde1, William Watson1.
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) can facilitate recovery of diminished stocks by protecting reproductive adults. To effectively augment fisheries, however, reproductive output must increase within the bounds of MPAs so that larvae can be exported to surrounding areas and seed the region. In response to dramatic declines of rockfishes (Sebastes spp.) in southern California by the late 1990s two large MPAs, the Cowcod Conservation Areas (CCAs), were established in 2001. To evaluate whether the CCAs affected rockfish productivity we evaluated the dynamics of 8 species that were, and 7 that were not, historically targeted by fishing. Abundances of 6/8 targeted and 4/7 non-targeted species increased regionally from 1998 to 2013. These upturns were probably affected by environmental conditions in addition to changes in fishing pressure as the presence of most species correlated negatively with temperature, and temperature was lower than the historic average in 11/15 years. Seventy-five per cent of the targeted, but none of the non-targeted species increased at a greater rate inside than outside the CCAs while controlling for environmental factors. Results indicate that management actions, coupled with favourable environmental conditions, facilitated the resurgence of multiple rockfish species that were targeted by intense fishing effort for decades.Entities:
Keywords: California; fisheries management; marine conservation; marine protected area; rockfish
Year: 2017 PMID: 28989766 PMCID: PMC5627106 DOI: 10.1098/rsos.170639
Source DB: PubMed Journal: R Soc Open Sci ISSN: 2054-5703 Impact factor: 2.963
Figure 1.Location of stations. Colours designate stations with similar environmental conditions. These stations were used to determine whether rates of change in larval abundance differed inside and outside of the Cowcod Conservation Areas. Boundaries of the fine-scale map are shown in yellow on the large-scale inset map.
Abundances of the 15 analysed species summed over the 16-year study period. Abundance is expressed in no. larvae under 10 m2 (no. larvae multiplied by a standard haul factor) and number of larvae is the raw number for each species. Fishing pressure is based on descriptions by Love et al. [19]. A complete list of genetically identified species is shown in electronic supplementary material, table S1.
| species | common name | fishing pressure | abundance | no. larvae |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| squarespot | low | 9430 | 2171 | |
| shortbelly | low | 6965 | 1494 | |
| pygmy | none | 2254 | 489 | |
| bocaccio | high | 1508 | 330 | |
| blue | high | 1508 | 328 | |
| halfbanded | low | 1371 | 323 | |
| bank | high | 1053 | 228 | |
| stripetail | low | 1047 | 226 | |
| speckled | high | 808 | 183 | |
| chilipepper | high | 717 | 143 | |
| swordspine | low | 557 | 119 | |
| olive | moderate | 461 | 106 | |
| whitespeckled | none | 395 | 86 | |
| widow | low | 344 | 72 | |
| copper | high | 324 | 72 | |
| cowcod | high | 195 | 43 |
Figure 2.Change in mean larval abundances through time for species targeted by fishing. Red line (best linear fit) and shading (95% confidence interval) are shown for species where there was a significant relationship between mean abundance and year.
Figure 3.Change in mean larval abundances through time for species not targeted by fishing. Red line (best linear fit) and shading (95% confidence interval) are shown for species where there was a significant relationship between mean abundance and year.
Slopes of logistic regression coefficients for targeted (upper) and untargeted rockfishes. A * denotes significance at p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01, ****p < 0.001
| coefficient | copper | widow | chilipepper | blue | speckled | bocaccio | bank | olive |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| temperature | −0.55 | −0.9*** | −0.20 | −1.080**** | −0.44* | −0.74**** | −0.12 | −0.63** |
| salinity | 0.88 | −1.32 | −3.21** | −0.38 | −0.64 | −1.47 | 0.25 | −1.14 |
| oxygen | 0.24 | 0.51 | −0.90 | 1.021** | 0.00 | 0.31 | 0.54 | 0.24 |
| chlorophyll | 0.49** | 0.00 | −0.02 | 0.25 | 0.09 | −0.04 | −0.20 | 0.14 |
| year | 0.098* | 0.03 | 0.12** | 0.080** | 0.12*** | 0.059* | 0.081*** | 0.07 |
Figure 4.Temperature (°C), salinity (psu), oxygen (ml l−1) and chlorophyll a (μg l−1) in the upper 3–100 m averaged across all stations for each year. Blue lines are annual winter averages between 1982 and 2013 from the same stations.
Figure 5.Relationship between larval abundance and year for targeted species with at least 150 larvae under 10 m2 summed across 12 paired stations (six inside and six outside of the CCAs) during the study. Red and blue colours depict stations within and outside of the CCAs, respectively. Best-fit linear regression lines and 95% confidence intervals are shown for species where there was a significant interaction between year and CCA.