| Literature DB >> 28329771 |
David A Gill1,2, Michael B Mascia3, Gabby N Ahmadia4, Louise Glew4, Sarah E Lester5, Megan Barnes6,7, Ian Craigie8, Emily S Darling9, Christopher M Free10, Jonas Geldmann11,12, Susie Holst13, Olaf P Jensen10, Alan T White14, Xavier Basurto15, Lauren Coad16,17, Ruth D Gates18, Greg Guannel19, Peter J Mumby20, Hannah Thomas21, Sarah Whitmee22, Stephen Woodley23, Helen E Fox4,24.
Abstract
Marine protected areas (MPAs) are increasingly being used globally to conserve marine resources. However, whether many MPAs are being effectively and equitably managed, and how MPA management influences substantive outcomes remain unknown. We developed a global database of management and fish population data (433 and 218 MPAs, respectively) to assess: MPA management processes; the effects of MPAs on fish populations; and relationships between management processes and ecological effects. Here we report that many MPAs failed to meet thresholds for effective and equitable management processes, with widespread shortfalls in staff and financial resources. Although 71% of MPAs positively influenced fish populations, these conservation impacts were highly variable. Staff and budget capacity were the strongest predictors of conservation impact: MPAs with adequate staff capacity had ecological effects 2.9 times greater than MPAs with inadequate capacity. Thus, continued global expansion of MPAs without adequate investment in human and financial capacity is likely to lead to sub-optimal conservation outcomes.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28329771 DOI: 10.1038/nature21708
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nature ISSN: 0028-0836 Impact factor: 49.962