Literature DB >> 28989388

Review of technologies available to improve hand hygiene compliance - are they fit for purpose?

Carolyn H Dawson1, Jamie B Mackrill1.   

Abstract

Hand hygiene has been empirically proven to prevent cross-transmission of infection, which has led to the development of global guidelines such as the World Health Organization's 'My 5 Moments for Hand Hygiene.' Because of the relatively recent launch of these guidelines (2009) technology designed to assist in measuring hand hygiene compliance appears not to fully acknowledge the influence of the WHO 5 Moments for hand hygiene Consequently, they may not be fit for purpose (FFP). This paper uses a review of the literature on current hand hygiene technology to assess the extent to which these are FFP based on these global guidelines. The results show that there are a variety of technologies available to assist with the monitoring and measurement of hand hygiene levels. However, none appear to explicitly achieve detection of all WHO 5 Moments for hand hygiene, limiting their effectiveness. The authors conclude that a systems approach offers a potential aid for developers aspiring to meet domain specific FFP requirements. Human factors may help guide such developments to meet user and context specific needs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditing; WHO 5 moments; electronic surveillance; feedback; hand hygiene; human factors; measurement; patient safety; technology

Year:  2014        PMID: 28989388      PMCID: PMC5074106          DOI: 10.1177/1757177414548695

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Prev        ISSN: 1757-1782


  28 in total

1.  Fundamentals of ergonomics in theory and practice.

Authors:  J R Wilson
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.661

2.  Successful use of alcohol sensor technology to monitor and report hand hygiene compliance.

Authors:  M B Edmond; A Goodell; W Zuelzer; K Sanogo; K Elam; G Bearman
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.926

3.  Compliance with antiseptic hand rub use in intensive care units: the Hawthorne effect.

Authors:  Tim Eckmanns; Jan Bessert; Michael Behnke; Petra Gastmeier; Henning Ruden
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2006-08-22       Impact factor: 3.254

4.  Variability in the Hawthorne effect with regard to hand hygiene performance in high- and low-performing inpatient care units.

Authors:  Erol Kohli; Judy Ptak; Randall Smith; Eileen Taylor; Elizabeth A Talbot; Kathryn B Kirkland
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.254

5.  Handy solutions. Hygiene compliance monitoring goes high-tech.

Authors:  Jeff Ferenc
Journal:  Health Facil Manage       Date:  2012-04

6.  Healthcare personnel perceptions of hand hygiene monitoring technology.

Authors:  Katherine Ellingson; Philip M Polgreen; Amy Schneider; Laura Shinkunas; Lauris C Kaldjian; Donald Wright; Geb W Thomas; Alberto M Segre; Ted Herman; L Clifford McDonald; Ronda Sinkowitz-Cochran
Journal:  Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 3.254

Review 7.  A human factors engineering conceptual framework of nursing workload and patient safety in intensive care units.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Ayşe P Gürses
Journal:  Intensive Crit Care Nurs       Date:  2005-02-24       Impact factor: 3.072

8.  Effectiveness of gloves in the prevention of hand carriage of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus species by health care workers after patient care.

Authors:  A R Tenorio; S M Badri; N B Sahgal; B Hota; M Matushek; M K Hayden; G M Trenholme; R A Weinstein
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-02-23       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 9.  Measuring handwashing performance in health service audits and research studies.

Authors:  D J Gould; J Chudleigh; N S Drey; D Moralejo
Journal:  J Hosp Infect       Date:  2007-04-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Using high-technology to enforce low-technology safety measures: the use of third-party remote video auditing and real-time feedback in healthcare.

Authors:  Donna Armellino; Erfan Hussain; Mary Ellen Schilling; William Senicola; Ann Eichorn; Yosef Dlugacz; Bruce F Farber
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2011-11-21       Impact factor: 9.079

View more
  3 in total

1.  Investigating the use of an electronic hand hygiene monitoring and prompt device: influence and acceptability.

Authors:  Judith Dyson; Maurice Madeo
Journal:  J Infect Prev       Date:  2017-07-04

2.  Impact of mhealth messages and environmental cues on hand hygiene practice among healthcare workers in the greater Kampala metropolitan area, Uganda: study protocol for a cluster randomized trial.

Authors:  Richard K Mugambe; Jane Sembuche Mselle; Tonny Ssekamatte; Moses Ntanda; John Bosco Isunju; Solomon T Wafula; Winnifred K Kansiime; Prossy Isubikalu; David Ssemwanga; Habib Yakubu; Christine L Moe
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 3.  Role of Human Factors Engineering in Infection Prevention: Gaps and Opportunities.

Authors:  Priyadarshini R Pennathur; Loreen A Herwaldt
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Infect Dis       Date:  2017-05-06
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.