Literature DB >> 28988358

Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Turkish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for low back pain.

Engin Çetin1, Evrim Coşkun Çelik2, Emre Acaroğlu3, Haluk Berk4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To produce a cross-culturally adapted and validated Turkish version of The Core Outcome Measure Index (COMI) Back questionnaire.
METHODS: Ninety-six Turkish-speaking patients with non-specific low back pain (LBP) were recruited from orthopedic and physical therapy outpatient clinics in a public hospital. They completed a booklet of questionnaires containing Turkish version of COMI, adjectival pain scale, Roland Morris disability questionnaire, European 5 Dimension Questionnaire and brief version of World Health Organization Quality of Life Questionnaire. Within following 7-14 days, 67 patients, reported no or minimal changes in their back pain status, completed the Turkish COMI again to assess reproducibility.
RESULTS: Data quality was good with very few missing answers. COMI summary index score displayed 3% floor effects and no ceiling effects. The correlations between the COMI summary index score and each of the full instrument whole scores were found to be excellent to very good (ρ = - 0.81 to 0.74). Reliability expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.95 (95% CI 0.91-0.97). Standard error of measurement (SEMagreement) was acceptable at 0.41 and the minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was 1.14.
CONCLUSION: Turkish version of the COMI has acceptable psychometric properties. It is a valid and reliable instrument and cross-culturally adapted, in accordance with established guidelines, for the use by Turkish-speaking patients. It can be recommended for use in evaluation of patients with chronic LBP in daily practice, in international multicenter studies and in spine registry systems.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COMI; Cross-cultural adaptation; Low back pain; Questionnaire

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28988358     DOI: 10.1007/s00586-017-5329-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  28 in total

Review 1.  Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research.

Authors:  E M Andresen
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 2.  EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group.

Authors:  R Rabin; F de Charro
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.709

3.  Stability of psychometric questionnaires.

Authors:  A M Nevill; A M Lane; L J Kilgour; N Bowes; G P Whyte
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.337

Review 4.  EuroQol: the current state of play.

Authors:  R Brooks
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 2.980

5.  Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Hungarian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the back (COMI Back).

Authors:  Istvan Klemencsics; Aron Lazary; Tamas Valasek; Zsolt Szoverfi; Arpad Bozsodi; Peter Eltes; Tamás Fülöp Fekete; Peter Pal Varga
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.

Authors:  F Guillemin; C Bombardier; D Beaton
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Reliability and validity of the cross-culturally adapted Italian version of the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; M Boneschi; M Teli; A Luca; F Zaina; S Negrini; P J Schulz
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  The quality of spine surgery from the patient's perspective: part 2. Minimal clinically important difference for improvement and deterioration as measured with the Core Outcome Measures Index.

Authors:  A F Mannion; F Porchet; F S Kleinstück; F Lattig; D Jeszenszky; V Bartanusz; J Dvorak; D Grob
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

View more
  1 in total

1.  Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck pain.

Authors:  Gul Oznur Karabicak; Zeynep Hazar Kanik; Gurkan Gunaydin; Omer Osman Pala; Seyit Citaker
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-10-31       Impact factor: 3.134

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.