Patrick Ip1, Frederick Ka-Wing Ho2, Lobo Hung-Tak Louie3, Thomas Wai-Hung Chung4, Yiu-Fai Cheung2, So-Lun Lee2, Stanley Sai-Chuen Hui5, Walter King-Yan Ho6, Daniel Sai-Yin Ho7, Wilfred Hing-Sang Wong2, Fan Jiang8. 1. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. Electronic address: patricip@hku.hk. 2. Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong. 3. Department of Physical Education, Hong Kong Baptist University, Hong Kong. 4. Student Health Service, Department of Health, Hong Kong SAR Government, Hong Kong. 5. Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. 6. Faculty of Education, University of Macau, Macau SAR. 7. School of Public Health, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR. 8. Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Childhood obesity may be related to school environment, but previous studies often focused on food environment only. This study aimed to examine the relationship between school physical activity environment and childhood obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study with multilevel data collected on school physical activity environment using teacher questionnaires, students' growth, and obesity status from electronic health records, and neighborhood socioeconomic status from census data. RESULTS: This study included 208 280 students (6-18 years of age) from 438 schools (45% of Hong Kong). Prevalence of obesity was 5.0%. After controlling for socioeconomic status and intraschool correlation, robust Poisson regression revealed a reduced obesity risk associated with higher teachers' perceived physical activity benefits (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P = .02), physical activity teaching experience (0.93, 0.91-0.96, P < .001), school campus size (0.93, 0.87-0.99, P = .02), physical activity ethos (0.91, 0.88-0.94, P < .001), number of physical activity programs (0.93, 0.90-0.96, P < .001), and physical activity facilities (0.87, 0.84-0.90, P < .001). Students in schools with at least 3 physical activity-friendly environmental factors (11.7%) had a much lower risk of obesity (0.68, 0.62-0.75, P < .001) than those without (23.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A physical activity-friendly school environment is associated with lower risk of obesity. School physical activity environment should be considered in future epidemiologic and intervention studies.
OBJECTIVE: Childhood obesity may be related to school environment, but previous studies often focused on food environment only. This study aimed to examine the relationship between school physical activity environment and childhood obesity. STUDY DESIGN: This is a cross-sectional study with multilevel data collected on school physical activity environment using teacher questionnaires, students' growth, and obesity status from electronic health records, and neighborhood socioeconomic status from census data. RESULTS: This study included 208 280 students (6-18 years of age) from 438 schools (45% of Hong Kong). Prevalence of obesity was 5.0%. After controlling for socioeconomic status and intraschool correlation, robust Poisson regression revealed a reduced obesity risk associated with higher teachers' perceived physical activity benefits (risk ratio 0.96, 95% CI 0.94-0.99, P = .02), physical activity teaching experience (0.93, 0.91-0.96, P < .001), school campus size (0.93, 0.87-0.99, P = .02), physical activity ethos (0.91, 0.88-0.94, P < .001), number of physical activity programs (0.93, 0.90-0.96, P < .001), and physical activity facilities (0.87, 0.84-0.90, P < .001). Students in schools with at least 3 physical activity-friendly environmental factors (11.7%) had a much lower risk of obesity (0.68, 0.62-0.75, P < .001) than those without (23.7%). CONCLUSIONS: A physical activity-friendly school environment is associated with lower risk of obesity. School physical activity environment should be considered in future epidemiologic and intervention studies.
Authors: Nia Coupe; Sarah Peters; Matilda Ayres; Katie Clabon; Alexandra Reilly; Anna Chisholm Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 4.135
Authors: Hannah G Lane; Hannah G Calvert; Rachel Deitch; Ryan Harris; Oyinlola T Babatunde; Lindsey Turner; Erin R Hager; Stephanie Jilcott Pitts Journal: Health Place Date: 2020-09-06 Impact factor: 4.931
Authors: Alison Carver; Muhammad Akram; Anthony Barnett; Wendy Yajun Huang; Gemma Yang Gao; Robin R Mellecker; Ester Cerin Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2021-01-19 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Wendy Y Huang; Stephen H S Wong; Cindy H P Sit; Martin C S Wong; Raymond K W Sum; Sam W S Wong; Jane J Yu Journal: J Exerc Sci Fit Date: 2018-10-08 Impact factor: 3.103