Literature DB >> 28987690

Peri-aortic fluid after surgery on the ascending aorta: Worrisome indicator of complications or innocent postoperative finding?

Sara Boccalini1, Laurens E Swart2, Jos A Bekkers3, Koen Nieman2, Gabriel P Krestin4, Ad J J C Bogers3, Ricardo P J Budde4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The Bentall procedure is associated with several complications often accompanied by accumulation of fluid around the aortic graft. CT is the imaging modality of choice to detect these complications. Since these early complications are, however, not easily distinguished from physiological postoperative changes, our aim was to compare the appearance and amount of peri-aortic fluid on early CT scans following Bentall procedures with either an uncomplicated or a complicated course and follow-up.
METHODS: Ninety-four scans performed within 3 months of a Bentall procedure were retrospectively included. Patients were divided into either the uncomplicated or the complicated group based on occurrence of Bentall-related complications or death up until 1-year after surgery. Diffuse fluid ("stranding") was distinguished from organized, more clearly delineated fluid collections such as haematomas, and was graded both subjectively and quantitatively.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients were assigned to each group. Stranding was found on most of the scans, both in the uncomplicated (7.7±3.9mm, range 0-17mm) and complicated (6.9±5.5mm, range 0-19mm) groups (p=0.32). There were, however, significantly more fluid collections (6 vs. 28; p <0.001), particularly haematomas (1 vs. 17; p<0.001), in the complicated group. When looking at isolated stranding, there was still no significant difference between the two groups (7.8±3.6mm vs. 9.2±3.7mm; p=0.22).
CONCLUSION: Isolated stranding of up to 17mm is a common finding on postoperative CT within three months of a Bentall procedure, regardless of the occurrence of complications during the procedure or within a 1-year follow-up. Fluid collections are more worrisome indicators of complications that may require closer monitoring.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aorta, thoracic; Aortic valve/surgery; Cardiovascular surgical procedures; Multidetector computed tomography; Postoperative complications; Prosthesis-related infection

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28987690     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.09.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  3 in total

Review 1.  CT angiography for depiction of complications after the Bentall procedure.

Authors:  Sara Boccalini; Laurens E Swart; Jos A Bekkers; Koen Nieman; Gabriel P Krestin; Ad Jjc Bogers; Ricardo Pj Budde
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Role of Multimodal Imaging in Patients With Suspected Infections After the Bentall Procedure.

Authors:  Martina Sollini; Francesco Bartoli; Roberto Boni; Roberta Zanca; Andrea Colli; Maurizio Levantino; Francesco Menichetti; Mauro Ferrari; Raffaella Berchiolli; Elena Lazzeri; Paola A Erba
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-01

3.  Evidence-based guideline of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) on imaging infection in vascular grafts.

Authors:  Chiara Lauri; Alberto Signore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Giorgio Treglia; Olivier Gheysens; Riemer H J A Slart; Roberto Iezzi; Niek H J Prakken; Eike Sebastian Debus; Susanne Honig; Anne Lejay; Nabil Chakfé
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 10.057

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.