Literature DB >> 28987286

Determination of sex differences of human cadaveric mandibular condyles using statistical shape and trait modeling.

Jessica S Coogan1, Do-Gyoon Kim2, Todd L Bredbenner3, Daniel P Nicolella4.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to elucidate sex differences in the anatomy of human temporomandibular joint mandibular condyles using a statistical shape and trait model (SSTM). Mandibles were obtained from 16 human cadavers (79±13years). The condyles were scanned using micro-computed tomography with 27μm resolution. An image processing algorithm was used to segment the bone, determine the border of the entire mandibular condyle and trabecular bone compartments, and create triangulated meshes of the compartments. One subject was chosen as the template and was registered to the other individuals using a coherence point drift algorithm. This process positioned all vertices at corresponding anatomic locations. For the trabecular bone region, around each vertex position, the average bone image intensity, which is proportional to bone density, and microstructural traits, including trabecular bone volume fraction, thickness, separation, connectivity, and connectivity density were calculated. For the entire mandibular condyle mesh, the surface vertices were extracted to represent the overall anatomy of the condyle. Using a SSTM, the shape and trait information was reduced to a small set of independent and uncorrelated variables for each individual. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to test for differences in the variables between sexes. A lasso approach was used to determine a set of variables that differentiate between sexes. Male condyles were on average larger than female condyles, with complex differences in the microstructural traits. Two out of 15 principal components were statistically different between males and females (p<0.1). The lasso approach determined a set of 7 principal components that fully described the complex shape and trait differences between males and females. A SSTM was able to determine sex-dependent differences in the shape of the mandibular condyle. These differences may alter the biomechanics of the joint and contribute to the development of temporomandibular joint disease.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anatomy; Dental morphology; Gender differences; Statistical shape modeling; Temporomandibular disorders

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28987286     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2017.10.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

1.  Temporomandibular Joint Condyle-Disc Morphometric Sexual Dimorphisms Independent of Skull Scaling.

Authors:  Matthew C Coombs; Xin She; Truman R Brown; Elizabeth H Slate; Janice S Lee; Hai Yao
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019-04-25       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 2.  Estrogen signaling impacts temporomandibular joint and periodontal disease pathology.

Authors:  Jennifer L Robinson; Pamela M Johnson; Karolina Kister; Michael T Yin; Jing Chen; Sunil Wadhwa
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  A statistical shape model of soleus muscle morphology in spastic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Salim G Bin Ghouth; Sian A Williams; Siobhan L Reid; Thor F Besier; Geoffrey G Handsfield
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-11       Impact factor: 4.996

Review 4.  Understanding Early-Stage Posttraumatic Osteoarthritis for Future Prospects of Diagnosis: from Knee to Temporomandibular Joint.

Authors:  Fazal-Ur-Rehman Bhatti; Anastasios Karydis; Beth S Lee; Toru Deguchi; Do-Gyoon Kim; Hongsik Cho
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-02-01       Impact factor: 5.096

5.  Reliable landmarks for precise topographical analyses of pathological structural changes of the ovine tibial plateau in 2-D and 3-D subspaces.

Authors:  Tamás Oláh; Jan Reinhard; Liang Gao; Lars K H Goebel; Henning Madry
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Approximating the maximum tibial coverage in total knee arthroplasty does not necessarily result in implant malrotation.

Authors:  Long Shao; Xiang-Dong Wu; Ting Wang; Xiao-Kang Liu; Wei Xu; Wei Huang; Zhi-Min Zeng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Evaluation of temporomandibular disorders among dental students of Saudi Arabia using Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (DC/TMD): a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Kumar Chandan Srivastava; Deepti Shrivastava; Zafar Ali Khan; Anil Kumar Nagarajappa; Mohammed Assayed Mousa; May Othman Hamza; Khalid Al-Johani; Mohammad Khursheed Alam
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Using ESTIMATE algorithm to establish an 8-mRNA signature prognosis prediction system and identify immunocyte infiltration-related genes in Pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Zibo Meng; Dianyun Ren; Kun Zhang; Jingyuan Zhao; Xin Jin; Heshui Wu
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2020-03-17       Impact factor: 5.682

9.  Evaluation of Statistical Shape Modeling in Quantifying Femoral Morphologic Differences Between Symptomatic and Nonsymptomatic Hips in Patients with Unilateral Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome.

Authors:  Timothy C Keating; Natalie Leong; Edward C Beck; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Xioaping Qian; Kang Li; Shane J Nho
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-02-05
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.