Literature DB >> 28986510

Combined 18F-Fluciclovine PET/MRI Shows Potential for Detection and Characterization of High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Mattijs Elschot1, Kirsten M Selnæs2,3, Elise Sandsmark2, Brage Krüger-Stokke2,4, Øystein Størkersen5, Guro F Giskeødegård2,3, May-Britt Tessem2, Siver A Moestue6, Helena Bertilsson7,8, Tone F Bathen2,3.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to investigate whether quantitative imaging features derived from combined 18F-fluciclovine PET/multiparametric MRI show potential for detection and characterization of primary prostate cancer.
Methods: Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with high-risk prostate cancer underwent simultaneous 18F-fluciclovine PET/MRI before radical prostatectomy. Volumes of interest (VOIs) for prostate tumors, benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) nodules, prostatitis, and healthy tissue were delineated on T2-weighted images, using histology as a reference. Tumor VOIs were marked as high-grade (≥Gleason grade group 3) or not. MRI and PET features were extracted on the voxel and VOI levels. Partial least-squared discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) with double leave-one-patient-out cross-validation was performed to distinguish tumors from benign tissue (BPH, prostatitis, or healthy tissue) and high-grade tumors from other tissue (low-grade tumors or benign tissue). The performance levels of PET, MRI, and combined PET/MRI features were compared using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC).
Results: Voxel and VOI features were extracted from 40 tumor VOIs (26 high-grade), 36 BPH VOIs, 6 prostatitis VOIs, and 37 healthy-tissue VOIs. PET/MRI performed better than MRI and PET alone for distinguishing tumors from benign tissue (AUCs of 87%, 81%, and 83%, respectively, at the voxel level and 96%, 93%, and 93%, respectively, at the VOI level) and high-grade tumors from other tissue (AUCs of 85%, 79%, and 81%, respectively, at the voxel level and 93%, 93%, and 91%, respectively, at the VOI level). T2-weighted MRI, diffusion-weighted MRI, and PET features were the most important for classification.
Conclusion: Combined 18F-fluciclovine PET/multiparametric MRI shows potential for improving detection and characterization of high-risk prostate cancer, in comparison to MRI and PET alone.
© 2018 by the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

Entities:  

Keywords:  FACBC; PET/MRI; PLS-DA; fluciclovine; prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28986510     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  11 in total

1.  18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Divya Yadav; Hyunsoo Hwang; Wei Qiao; Rituraj Upadhyay; Brian F Chapin; Chad Tang; Ana Aparicio; Maria A Lopez-Olivo; Stella K Kang; Homer A Macapinlac; Tharakeswara K Bathala; Devaki Shilpa Surasi
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2022-03

Review 2.  Role of molecular imaging in the detection of localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Samuel J Galgano; Janelle T West; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-06-21

3.  Performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET/MR in the evaluation of osseous metastases from castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  Barbara J Amorim; Vinay Prabhu; Sara S Marco; Debra Gervais; Willian E Palmer; Pedram Heidari; Mark Vangel; Philip J Saylor; Onofrio A Catalano
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Simultaneous 18F-fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Morteza Esmaeili; Nassim Tayari; Tom Scheenen; Mattijs Elschot; Elise Sandsmark; Helena Bertilsson; Arend Heerschap; Kirsten M Selnæs; Tone F Bathen
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 5.  Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification.

Authors:  Kyle H Gennaro; Kristin K Porter; Jennifer B Gordetsky; Samuel J Galgano; Soroush Rais-Bahrami
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-30

Review 6.  18F-Fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography in Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Diagnostic Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Giuseppina Biscontini; Cinzia Romagnolo; Chiara Cottignoli; Andrea Palucci; Fabio Massimo Fringuelli; Carmelo Caldarella; Francesco Ceci; Luca Burroni
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-02-13

Review 7.  MRI/PET Imaging in elevated PSA and localized prostate cancer: a narrative review.

Authors:  Subodh K Regmi; Niranjan Sathianathen; Thomas E Stout; Badrinath R Konety
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-07

Review 8.  New imaging modalities to consider for men with prostate cancer on active surveillance.

Authors:  Yasin Bhanji; Steven P Rowe; Christian P Pavlovich
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-06-19       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Feasibility of Dose Escalating [18F]fluciclovine Positron Emission Tomography Positive Pelvic Lymph Nodes During Moderately Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Andrew M McDonald; Samuel J Galgano; Jonathan E McConathy; Eddy S Yang; Michael C Dobelbower; Rojymon Jacob; Soroush Rais-Bahrami; Jeffrey W Nix; Richard A Popple; John B Fiveash
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2019-06-19

10.  The Role of [18F]Fluciclovine PET/CT in the Characterization of High-Risk Primary Prostate Cancer: Comparison with [11C]Choline PET/CT and Histopathological Analysis.

Authors:  Lucia Zanoni; Riccardo Mei; Lorenzo Bianchi; Francesca Giunchi; Lorenzo Maltoni; Cristian Vincenzo Pultrone; Cristina Nanni; Irene Bossert; Antonella Matti; Riccardo Schiavina; Michelangelo Fiorentino; Cristina Fonti; Filippo Lodi; Antonietta D'Errico; Eugenio Brunocilla; Stefano Fanti
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.